Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Tolstorukov, M. Y.

Publications and source records attributed to Tolstorukov, M. Y..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Atomistic TCR-ligand interactions instruct memory T-cell differentiation

Memory CD8 T cells provide durable protection against recurrent infection and cancer, but how distinct memory fates are specified remains unclear. Here, we define the functional landscape of 242 murine CD8 TCR{beta} clonotypes specific for influenza NP366-374/H-2D ligand (pMHC) by integrating single-cell transcriptomics and TCR sequencing with force-dependent biophysics, structural analysis, and in vivo investigation of memory development. Fate essentially tracks with TCR mechanotransduction: TCM-associated clonotypes preferentially engage pMHC through TCR{beta}, whereas TEM-associated clonotypes preferentially engage through TCR. Clonotypes with balanced, bipolar signaling generate both memory subsets, optimize expansion, and display broad heterosubtypic crossreactivity but with exhaustion susceptibility. In contrast, diverse TCM clonotypes are largely clonal singlets with considerable mutant-epitope recognition in aggregate and stemness preservation, revealing complementary strategies for immunodefense coverage. Atomistically, subtle pMHC contact differences and load transmission through the TCR holoreceptor appear to tune phosphorylation, memory differentiation, and functional durability, features applicable to adoptive T-cell immunotherapies.

immunology↗

Parsing digital or analogue TCR performance through piconewton forces

{beta} T-cell receptors (TCRs) recognize aberrant peptides bound to major histocompatibility complex molecules (pMHCs) on unhealthy cells, amplifying specificity and sensitivity through physical load placed on the TCR-pMHC bond during immunosurveillance. To understand this mechanobiology, TCRs stimulated by abundantly and sparsely arrayed epitopes (NP366-374 /Db and PA224-233/Db, respectively) following in vivo influenza A virus infection were studied with optical tweezers. While certain NP repertoire CD8 T lymphocytes require many ligands for activation, others are digital, needing just few. Conversely, all PA TCRs perform digitally, exhibiting pronounced bond lifetime increases through sustained, energizing volleys of structural transitioning. Optimal digital performance is superior in vivo, correlating with ERK phosphorylation, CD3 loss, and activation marker upregulation in vitro. Given neoantigen array paucity, digital TCRs are likely critical for immunotherapies. One Sentence SummaryQuality of ligand recognition in a T-cell repertoire is revealed through application of physical load on clonal T-cell receptor (TCR)-pMHC bonds

immunology↗

Regulation of Neuroendocrine Plasticity by the RNA-Binding Protein ZFP36L1

Some small cell lung cancers (SCLCs) are highly sensitive to inhibitors of the histone demethylase LSD1. LSD1 inhibitors are thought to induce their anti-proliferative effects by blocking neuroendocrine differentiation, but the mechanisms by which LSD1 controls the SCLC neuroendocrine phenotype are not well understood. To identify genes required for LSD1 inhibitor sensitivity in SCLC, we performed a positive selection genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 loss of function screen and found that ZFP36L1, an mRNA-binding protein that destabilizes mRNAs, is required for LSD1 inhibitor sensitivity. LSD1 binds and represses ZFP36L1 and upon LSD1 inhibition, ZFP36L1 expression is restored, which is sufficient to block the SCLC neuroendocrine differentiation phenotype and induce a non-neuroendocrine "inflammatory" phenotype. Mechanistically, ZFP36L1 binds and destabilizes SOX2 and INSM1 mRNAs, two transcription factors that are required for SCLC neuroendocrine differentiation. This work identifies ZFP36L1 as an LSD1 target gene that controls the SCLC neuroendocrine phenotype and demonstrates that modulating mRNA stability of lineage transcription factors controls neuroendocrine to non-neuroendocrine plasticity.

cancer biology↗

Astrocyte-neuron crosstalk through Hedgehog signaling mediates cortical circuit assembly

Neuron-glia relationships play a critical role in the regulation of synapse formation and neuronal specification. The cellular and molecular mechanisms by which neurons and astrocytes communicate and coordinate are not well understood. Here we demonstrate that the canonical Sonic hedgehog (Shh) pathway is active in cortical astrocytes, where it acts to coordinate layer-specific synaptic connectivity and functional circuit development. We show that Ptch1 is a Shh receptor that is expressed by cortical astrocytes during development and that Shh signaling is necessary and sufficient to promote the expression of layer-specific astrocyte genes involved in regulating synapse formation and function. Loss of Shh in layer V neurons reduces astrocyte complexity and coverage by astrocytic processes in tripartite synapses, moreover, cell-autonomous activation of Shh signaling in astrocytes promotes cortical excitatory synapse formation. Together, these results suggest that Shh secreted from deep layer cortical neurons acts to specialize the molecular and functional features of astrocytes during development to shape circuit assembly and function.

neuroscience↗

Non-neutral evolution of H3.3-encoding genes occurs without alterations in protein sequence

Histone H3.3 is a developmentally essential variant encoded by two independent genes in human (H3F3A and H3F3B). While this two-gene arrangement is evolutionarily conserved, its origins and function remain unknown. Phylogenetics, synteny and gene structure analyses of the H3.3 genes from 32 metazoan genomes indicate independent evolutionary paths for H3F3A and H3F3B. While H3F3B bears similarities with H3.3 genes in distant organisms and with canonical H3 genes, H3F3A is sarcopterygian-specific and evolves under strong purifying selection. Additionally, H3F3B codon-usage preferences resemble those of broadly expressed genes and cell differentiation-induced genes, while codon-usage of H3F3A resembles that of cell proliferation-induced genes. We infer that H3F3B is more similar to the ancestral H3.3 gene and likely evolutionarily adapted for broad expression pattern in diverse cellular programs, while H3F3A adapted for a subset of gene expression programs. Thus, the arrangement of two independent H3.3 genes facilitates fine-tuning of H3.3 expression across cellular programs.

evolutionary biology↗