Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Tolaney, S. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Tolaney, S. M..

8 recordsLinked to original sources

Spatial/molecular heterogeneity and treatment response in HER2+ early breast cancer: Translational analyses from the DAPHNe trial

Given the heterogeneity of HER2-positive breast cancer, reliable biomarkers to guide treatment are needed. We conducted multi-platform biomarker analyses of baseline tumor tissue from the DAPHNe trial of neoadjuvant paclitaxel/trastuzumab/pertuzumab (THP) for HER2-positive early breast cancer to characterize inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity and to identify molecular predictors of response. A total of 98 patients with stage II-III HER2-positive breast cancer received neoadjuvant THP followed by surgery. Gene expression profiling, spatial protein profiling, and single-cell imaging (cyclic immunofluorescence) were performed on pre-treatment biopsies and a subset of residual disease specimens. Pathologic response was assessed using the residual cancer burden (RCB) score. Among HER2-positive patients included in the biomarker analysis, 34% of patients had node-positive breast cancer, and 66% had hormone receptor (HR)-positive tumors. HR-positive and HR-negative tumors differed significantly across gene expression, protein expression, and single-cell profiling. High ERBB2 gene signature, p53 gene signature, and HER2 protein expression predicted favorable response (RCB 0/1), while ESR1/PGR gene, estrogen receptor (ER) signaling gene signature, and ER alpha protein expression were associated with unfavorable response (RCB 2/3). Single-cell spatial analysis revealed that cancer cells clustered by shared HER2, ER, and PR expression, suggesting local expansion of phenotypically distinct subpopulations. ER-positive cancer cells were associated with lower HLA-A and PD-L1 expression, suggesting a less immunologically active tumor cell state. Baseline HER2 and ER expression are key predictors of response to neoadjuvant HER2-targeted therapy. Single-cell spatial profiling highlights intra-tumoral heterogeneity and suggests ER-driven immune exclusion as a potential mechanism of resistance.

cancer biology↗

APOE Tumor-Associated Macrophages and CD4-DOCK4 T Cells Reveal Distinct Microenvironmental Features in HER2-Low and HER2-0 Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer

Novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), such as trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), have shown efficacy in tumors with varying HER2 expression, including HER2-low and even tumors with minimal HER2 presence. This has sparked interest in the biology underlying the HER2 expression spectrum. Using molecular and multiplexed imaging, we revealed distinct immune and stromal features in treatment-naive, hormone receptor-positive (HR+) HER2-low versus HER2-0 tumors. HER2-0 tumors exhibit inflammatory and tissue remodeling gene signatures, with enrichment of APOE tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and DOCK4 CD4 T cells. In contrast, HER2-low tumors are more immunosuppressed, with elevated cell cycle, metabolic, and estrogen signaling pathways, suggesting increased proliferative activity. These findings underscore key biological differences between HR+ HER2-low and HER2-0 breast cancers, and may inform more tailored therapeutic strategies. Statement of significanceThis study revealed the distinct biological profiles of HR+ HER2-low and HER2-0 breast tumors. HER2-0 tumors exhibit inflammatory and tissue remodeling signatures, whereas HER2-low tumors have elevated cell cycle, metabolic, and estrogen signaling. These insights may help refine therapeutic approaches to improve outcomes for breast cancer patients.

cancer biology↗

An estrogen receptor signaling transcriptional program linked to immune evasion in human hormone receptor-positive breast cancer

T cells are generally sparse in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer, potentially due to limited antigen presentation, but the driving mechanisms of low T cell abundance remains unclear. Therefore, we defined and investigated programs ( gene modules), related to estrogen receptor signaling (ERS) and immune signaling using bulk and single-cell transcriptome and multiplexed immunofluorescence of breast cancer tissues from multiple clinical sources and human cell lines. The ERS gene module, dominantly expressed in cancer cells, was negatively associated with immune-related gene modules TNF/NF-{kappa}B signaling and type-I interferon (IFN-I) response, which were expressed in distinct stromal and immune cell types, but also, in part, expressed and preserved as a cancer cell-intrinsic mechanisms. Spatial analysis revealed that ERS strongly correlated with reduced T cell infiltration, potentially due to its association with suppression of TNF/NF-{kappa}B-induced angiogenesis and IFN-I-induced HLA expression in macrophages. Preoperative endocrine therapy in ER+/HER2-breast cancer patients produced better responses in ERS-high patients, with TNF/NF-{kappa}B expression associated with reduced ERS. Targeting these pathways may enhance T cell infiltration in HR+ breast cancer patients. Statement of SignificanceThis study elucidates the immunosuppressive role of ER signaling in breast cancer, highlighting a complex interplay between cancer, stromal, and immune cells and reveals potential approaches to enhance immunogenicity in HR+ breast cancer. These findings offer crucial insights into immune evasion in breast cancer and identify strategies to enhance T cell abundance.

cancer biology↗

Clinicogenomic characterization of inflammatory breast cancer

BackgroundInflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare and poorly characterized type of breast cancer with an aggressive clinical presentation. The biological mechanisms driving the IBC phenotype are relatively undefined--partially due to a lack of comprehensive, large-scale genomic studies and limited clinical cohorts. Patients and MethodsA retrospective analysis of 2457 patients with metastatic breast cancer who underwent targeted tumor-only DNA-sequencing was performed at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Clinicopathologic, single nucleotide variant (SNV), copy number variant (CNV) and tumor mutational burden (TMB) comparisons were made between clinically confirmed IBC cases within a dedicated IBC center versus non-IBC cases. ResultsClinicopathologic differences between IBC and non-IBC cases were consistent with prior reports--including IBC being associated with younger age at diagnosis, higher grade, and enrichment with hormone receptor (HR)-negative and HER2-positive tumors. The most frequent somatic alterations in IBC involved TP53 (72%), ERBB2 (32%), PIK3CA (24%), CCND1 (12%), MYC (9%), FGFR1 (8%) and GATA3 (8%). A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a significant enrichment in TP53 SNVs in IBC; particularly in HER2-positive and HR-positive disease which was associated with worse outcomes. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) did not differ substantially between IBC and non-IBC cases and a pathway analysis revealed an enrichment in NOTCH pathway alterations in HER2-positive disease. ConclusionTaken together, this study provides a comprehensive, clinically informed landscape of somatic alterations in a large cohort of patients with IBC. Our data support higher frequency of TP53 mutations and a potential enrichment in NOTCH pathway activation--but overall; a lack of major genomic differences. These results both reinforce the importance of TP53 alterations in IBC pathogenesis as well as their influence on clinical outcomes; but also suggest additional analyses beyond somatic DNA-level changes are warranted.

genomics↗

MAESTRO affords 'breadth and depth' for mutation testing

The ability to assay large numbers of low-abundance mutations is crucial in biomedicine. Yet, the technical hurdles of sequencing multiple mutations at extremely high depth and accuracy remain daunting. For sequencing low-level mutations, its either depth or breadth but not both. Here, we report a simple and powerful approach to accurately track thousands of distinct mutations with minimal reads. Our technique called MAESTRO (minor allele enriched sequencing through recognition oligonucleotides) employs massively-parallel mutation enrichment to empower duplex sequencing--one of the most accurate methods--to track up to 10,000 low-frequency mutations with up to 100-fold less sequencing. In example use cases, we show that MAESTRO could enable mutation validation from cancer genome sequencing studies. We also show that it could track thousands of mutations from a patients tumor in cell-free DNA, which may improve detection of minimal residual disease from liquid biopsies. In all, MAESTRO improves the breadth, depth, accuracy, and efficiency of mutation testing.

molecular biology↗

The genomic landscape of intrinsic and acquired resistance to cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in patients with hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer

Clinical resistance mechanisms to CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+ breast cancer have not been clearly defined. Whole exome sequencing of 59 tumors with CDK4/6i exposure revealed multiple candidate resistance mechanisms including RB1 loss, activating alterations in AKT1, RAS, AURKA, CCNE2, ERBB2, and FGFR2, and loss of ER expression. In vitro experiments confirmed that these alterations conferred CDK4/6i resistance. Cancer cells cultured to resistance with CDK4/6i also acquired RB1, KRAS, AURKA, or CCNE2 alterations, which conferred sensitivity to AURKA, ERK, or CHEK1 inhibition. Besides inactivation of RB1, which accounts for [~]5% of resistance, seven of these mechanisms have not been previously identified as clinical mediators of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients. Three of these--RAS activation, AKT activation, and AURKA activation--have not to our knowledge been previously demonstrated preclinically. Together, these eight mechanisms were present in 80% of resistant tumors profiled and may define therapeutic opportunities in patients. SignificanceWe identified eight distinct mechanisms of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors present in 80% of resistant tumors profiled. Most of these have a therapeutic strategy to overcome or prevent resistance in these tumors. Taken together, these findings have critical implications related to the potential utility of precision-based approaches to overcome resistance in many patients with HR+ MBC.

cancer biology↗

Reversion and non-reversion mechanisms of resistance to PARP inhibitor or platinum chemotherapy in BRCA1/2-mutant metastatic breast cancer

BackgroundLittle is known about mechanisms of resistance to PARP inhibitors and platinum chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer and BRCA1/2 mutations. Further investigation of resistance in clinical cohorts may point to strategies to prevent or overcome treatment failure. Patients and MethodsWe obtained tumor biopsies from metastatic breast cancer patients with BRCA1/2 deficiency before and after acquired resistance to PARP inhibitor or platinum chemotherapy. Whole exome sequencing was performed on each tumor, germline DNA, and circulating tumor DNA. Tumors underwent RNA sequencing, and immunohistochemical staining for RAD51 foci on tumor sections was performed for functional assessment of intact homologous recombination. ResultsPre- and post-resistance tumor samples were sequenced from 8 patients (4 with BRCA1 and 4 with BRCA2 mutation; 4 treated with PARP inhibitor and 4 with platinum). Following disease progression on DNA-damaging therapy, four patients (50%) acquired at least one somatic reversion alteration likely to result in functional BRCA1/2 protein detected by tumor or circulating tumor DNA sequencing. Two patients with germline BRCA1 deficiency acquired genomic alterations anticipated to restore homologous recombination through increased DNA end resection: loss of TP53BP1 in one patient and amplification of MRE11A in another. RAD51 foci were acquired post-resistance in all patients with genomic reversion, consistent with reconstitution of homologous recombination. All patients whose tumors demonstrated RAD51 foci post-resistance were intrinsically resistant to subsequent lines of DNA-damaging therapy. ConclusionsGenomic reversion in BRCA1/2 was the most commonly observed mechanism of resistance, occurring in 4 of 8 patients. Novel sequence alterations leading to increased DNA end resection were seen in two patients, and may be targetable for therapeutic benefit. The presence of RAD51 foci by immunohistochemistry was consistent with BRCA1/2 protein functional status from genomic data and predicted response to later DNA-damaging therapy, supporting RAD51 focus formation as a clinically useful biomarker.

cancer biology↗

Prevalence and mutational determinants of high tumor mutation burden in breast cancer

BackgroundHigh tumor mutation burden (TMB) has been associated with benefit to immunotherapy in multiple tumor types. However, the prevalence of hypermutated breast cancer is not well described. The aim of this study is to evaluate frequency, mutational patterns, and genomic profile of hypermutated breast cancer.\n\nPatients and MethodsWe used de-identified data from individuals with primary or metastatic breast cancer from six different publicly available genomic studies. The prevalence of hypermutated breast cancer was determined among 3969 patients samples that underwent whole exome sequencing or gene panel sequencing. Samples were classified as having high TMB if they had [&ge;]10 mutations per megabase (mut/Mb). An additional 8 patients were identified from a Dana-Farber Cancer Institute cohort for inclusion in the hypermutated cohort. Among patients with high TMB, the mutational patterns, and genomic profile were determined. A subset of patients was treated with regimens containing PD-1 inhibitors.\n\nResultsThe median TMB was 2.63 mut/Mb. Median TMB significantly varied according to tumor subtype (HR-/HER2-> HER2+ > HR+/HER2-, p < 0.05) and sample type (metastatic > primary, p 2.2x10-16). Hypermutated tumors were found in 198 patients (5%), with an enrichment in metastatic versus primary tumors (8.4% versus 2.9%, p = 6.5 x 10-14). APOBEC activity (59.2%), followed by mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd; 36.4%), were the most common mutational processes among hypermutated tumors. Three patients with hypermutated breast cancer--including two with a dominant APOBEC activity signature and one with a dominant MMRd signature--treated with pembrolizumab-based therapies derived an objective and durable response to therapy.\n\nConclusionHypermutation occurs in 5% of all breast cancers, with an enrichment in metastatic tumors. Different mutational signatures are present in this population, with APOBEC activity being the most common dominant process. Preliminary data suggest that hypermutated breast cancers are more likely to benefit from PD-1 inhibitors.\n\nKey MessageHigh tumor mutation burden is found in 5% of all breast cancers and is more common in metastatic tumors. While different mutational signatures are present in hypermutated tumors, APOBEC activity is the most common dominant process. Preliminary data suggest that those tumors are more likely to benefit from PD-1 inhibitors.

genomics↗