Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Tognon, C. E.

Publications and source records attributed to Tognon, C. E..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A noncanonical FLT3 gatekeeper mutation disrupts gilteritinib binding and confers resistance

The recent FDA approval of the FLT3 inhibitor, gilteritinib, for AML represents a major breakthrough for treatment of FLT3 mutated AML. However, patients only respond to gilteritinib for 6-7 months due to the emergence of drug resistance. Clinical resistance to gilteritinib is often associated with expansion of NRAS mutations, and less commonly via gatekeeper mutations in FLT3, with F691L being the most common. We developed an in vitro model that charts the temporal evolution of resistance to gilteritinib from early microenvironmental-mediated resistance to late intrinsic resistance mutations. Our model system accurately recapitulates the expansion of NRAS mutations and the F691L gatekeeper mutations found in AML patients. As part of this study, we also identified a novel FLT3N701K mutation that also appeared to promote resistance to gilteritinib. Using the Ba/F3 system, we demonstrate that N701K mutations effectively act like a gatekeeper mutation and block gilteritinib from binding to FLT3, thereby promoting resistance. Structural modeling of FLT3 reveals how N701K, and other reported gilteritinib resistance mutations, obstruct the gilteritinib binding pocket on FLT3. Interestingly, FLT3N701K does not block quizartinib binding, suggesting that FLT3N701K mutations are more specific for type 1 FLT3 inhibitors (gilteritinib, midostaurin, and crenolanib). Thus, our data suggests that for the FLT3N701K mutation, switching classes of FLT3 inhibitors may restore clinical response. As the use of gilteritinib expands in the clinic, this information will become critical to define clinical strategies to manage gilteritinib resistance.

cancer biology↗

Targeting mitochondria in cancer therapy could provide a basis for the selective anti-cancer activity

To determine the target of the recently identified lead compound NSC130362 that is responsible for its selective anti-cancer efficacy and safety in normal cells, structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies were conducted. First, NSC13062 was validated as a starting compound for the described SAR studies in a variety of cell-based viability assays. Then, a small library of 1,4-naphthoquinines (1,4-NQs) and quinoline-5,8-diones was tested in cell viability assays using pancreatic cancer MIA PaCa-2 cells and normal human hepatocytes. The obtained data allowed us to select a set of both non-toxic compounds that preferentially induced apoptosis in cancer cells and toxic compounds that induced apoptosis in both cancer and normal cells. Anti-cancer activity of the selected non-toxic compounds was confirmed in viability assays using breast cancer HCC1187 cells. Consequently, the two sets of compounds were tested in multiple cell-based and in vitro activity assays to identify key factors responsible for the observed activity. Inhibition of the mitochondrial electron transfer chain (ETC) is a key distinguishing activity between the non-toxic and toxic compounds. Finally, we developed a mathematical model that was able to distinguish these two sets of compounds. The development of this model supports our conclusion that appropriate quantitative SAR (QSAR) models have the potential to be employed to develop anticancer compounds with improved potency while maintaining non-toxicity to normal cells.

cancer biology↗