Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Titt, U.

Publications and source records attributed to Titt, U..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Long-term Musculoskeletal and Marrow Sparing with Proton FLASH in Juvenile Mice: Implications for Pediatric Osteosarcoma

PurposeOsteosarcoma is the most common primary bone malignancy in children and adolescents. Radiotherapy is limited by intrinsic radioresistance and the risk of severe long-term musculoskeletal toxicities. FLASH radiotherapy, delivered at ultra-high dose rates (>40 Gy/s), has demonstrated normal tissue sparing in preclinical models, but its effects on the developing skeleton and marrow remain poorly defined. This study evaluated the chronic normal tissue effects of proton FLASH in juvenile mice, modeling the pediatric context. Methods and MaterialsJuvenile C57BL/6 mice (3-4 weeks old) were randomized to receive 11 Gy FLASH ({approx}200 Gy/s) or conventional proton irradiation (0.2 Gy/s average), or sham treatment to the left hind leg using a synchrotron-based proton beamline. Mice were followed for 10 weeks post-treatment. Bone toxicity was assessed with microCT (bone mineral density, bone volume fractions, trabecular indices) and histology. Bone marrow cellularity was quantified on H&E-stained sections, and muscle fibrosis was assessed using Massons trichrome. ResultsFLASH-treated mice exhibited significant preservation of bone microarchitecture compared with conventional treated mice, with higher bone mineral density and bone volume fractions (p < 0.05). Trabecular numbers were maintained, while structure model index indicates a mechanically favorable trabecular structures in the FLASH group. Bone marrow cellularity was preserved in FLASH mice (5.3% reduction vs. sham) compared with conventional (11.3 % reduction, p < 0.05). Muscle fibrosis was significantly lower in FLASH group (fibrosis positivity 2.6 % vs. 3.0% for FLASH vs. conventional CONV, p < 0.05). No severe immobility or weight loss was observed across groups. ConclusionsProton FLASH significantly reduces long-term bone, marrow, and muscle toxicities in juvenile mice. These findings provide the first demonstration of musculoskeletal sparing in a synchrotron proton FLASH platform and highlight its translational potential for pediatric osteosarcoma.

cancer biology↗

Discordance in acute gastrointestinal toxicity between synchrotron-based proton and linac-based electron ultra-high dose rate irradiation

PurposeProton FLASH has been investigated using cyclotron and synchrocyclotron beamlines but not synchrotron beamlines. We evaluated the impact of dose rate (ultra-high [UHDR] vs. conventional [CONV]) and beam configuration (shoot-through [ST] vs. spread-out-Bragg-peak [SOBP]) on acute radiation-induced gastrointestinal toxicity (RIGIT) in mice. We also compared RIGIT between synchrotron-based protons and linac-based electrons with matched mean dose rates. Methods and MaterialsWe administered abdominal irradiation (12-14 Gy single fraction) to female C57BL/6J mice with an 87 MeV synchrotron-based proton beamline (2 cm diameter field size as a lateral beam). Dose rates were 0.2 Gy/s (S-T pCONV), 0.3 Gy/s (SOBP pCONV), 150 Gy/s (S-T pFLASH), and 230 Gy/s (SOBP pFLASH). RIGIT was assessed by the jejunal regenerating crypt assay and survival. We also compared responses to proton [pFLASH and pCONV] with responses to electron CONV (eCONV, 0.4 Gy/s) and electron FLASH (eFLASH, 188-205 Gy/s). ResultsThe number of regenerating jejunal crypts at each matched dose was lowest for pFLASH (similar between S-T and SOBP), greater and similar between pCONV (S-T and SOBP) and eCONV, and greatest for eFLASH. Correspondingly, mice that received pFLASH SOBP had the lowest survival rates (50% at 50 days), followed by pFLASH S-T (80%), and pCONV SOBP (90%), but 100% of mice receiving pCONV S-T survived (log-rank P = 0.047 for the four groups). ConclusionsOur findings are consistent with an increase in RIGIT after synchrotron-based pFLASH versus pCONV. This negative proton-specific FLASH effect versus linac-based electron irradiation underscores the importance of understanding the physical and biological factors that will allow safe and effective clinical translation.

cancer biology↗