Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Tillert, L.

Publications and source records attributed to Tillert, L..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Channelrhodopsin Ion Selectivity Determines Mechanisms and Efficacy of Optogenetic Defibrillation in Human Atria and Ventricles

Optogenetic defibrillation uses light-gated ion channels to terminate cardiac arrhythmias through targeted illumination. Previous studies assessed the feasibility of using either cation (e.g. ChR2) or anion (e.g. GtACR1) non-selective channels, both of which depolarise resting cardiomyocytes upon photoactivation. In contrast, recently identified light-gated K+-channels (e.g. WiChR) suppress cardiomyocyte activity while maintaining the membrane potential near its resting state. Here, we use biophysically detailed simulations to compare the defibrillation potential of ChR2, GtACR1, and WiChR. Single-cell simulations show that activation of ChR2 and GtACR1 markedly increase diastolic intracellular Ca2+ concentration (by 42.6% and 52.6%, respectively), whereas WiChR induces only minimal changes (4.0% increase), suggesting a lower pro-arrhythmogenic risk. WiChR activation, however, slightly increases intracellular Na+ levels (by 15.1% compared to 0.1% and 3.4% for ChR2 and GtACR), consistent with the residual Na+ permeability of all currently available K+-selective channelrhodopsins. Simulations of human ventricles and atria demonstrate that GtACR1 most effectively terminates re-entrant arrhythmias at low light intensities, while WiChR achieves comparable efficacy at light levels [≥]5 mW/mm2. Complementary tissue-scale simulations reveal that defibrillation is either based on depolarisation within the excitable gap, followed by fast Na+ channel inactivation (depolarising variants ChR2 and GtACR1), or based on a reduction in membrane resistance supporting arrhythmia termination at sufficiently high light levels (large-conductance ion channels GtACR1 and WiChR). Overall, our findings identify channelrhodopsin ion selectivity as a key determinant of both arrhythmia termination success and mechanisms underlying defibrillation. Key points summaryO_LIWe use computational simulations to compare non-selective cation (ChR2), anion (GtACR1), and K+-selective channelrhodopsins (WiChR) for optogenetic termination of re-entrant arrhythmia. C_LIO_LISingle-cardiomyocyte simulations suggest that ChR2 and GtACR1 activation can cause progressive accumulation of intracellular Ca2+, which is minimised when using WiChR. C_LIO_LISimulations of human left ventricles and atria indicate that GtACR1 is most effective in terminating re-entrant arrhythmia at low light intensities, while WiChR becomes similarly effective at higher intensities. C_LIO_LITissue-scale simulations indicate distinct defibrillation mechanisms: Excitable gap extinction by de-novo action potential initiation followed by inactivation of fast Na+ channels for depolarising channelrhodopsins (ChR2, GtACR1), and reduction in membrane resistance for the large-conductance channels (GtACR1, WiChR), effectively clamping the membrane potential at each channels reversal potential at high light levels. C_LI

physiology↗

Potassium-selective channelrhodopsins can exert hyper- or depolarizing effects in excitable cells of Caenorhabditis elegans, depending on experimental condition

One of the most frequent applications of optogenetic tools is for depolarization and stimulation of excitable cells such as neurons and muscles. Equally important, but less frequently used, are inhibitory tools that suppress activity through cellular hyperpolarization. These tools often rely on chloride conductance. Yet, in vivo, re- and hyperpolarization is typically mediated by potassium. In recent years, light-gated ion channels with a high preference for potassium were identified (Kalium channelrhodopsins, KCRs), and their inhibitory potential described in different organisms. Here, we characterized HcKCR1 and WiChR, in cholinergic neurons and muscles of Caenorhabditis elegans. Hyperpolarization of these cell types both induces muscle relaxation and, consequently, an elongation of the animals. Thus, we analyzed body length before, during, and after illumination, to assess KCR effectiveness, and to benchmark stimulation parameters like light intensity and duration. For HcKCR1 in cholinergic neurons, continuous illumination at high light intensities (1-4.5 mW/mm2) evoked only a transient elongation, while stimulation at 0.1 mW/mm2 could maintain inhibition for the duration of the stimulus in some transgenic strains. For animals expressing WiChR in body wall muscle cells or cholinergic neurons, we again observed brief hyperpolarization during continuous illumination, however, still during the stimulus, this changed to body contraction, corresponding to depolarization. This effect was long lasting, and required dozens of seconds for reversion, but could be reduced by pulsed illumination and fully avoided by less efficient channel activation using green or orange light. Hence, KCRs can be applied to hyperpolarize C. elegans cells, but require optimized illumination parameters. Article summaryTo inhibit excitable cells, light-gated, potassium-selective channels (KCRs) can be used. This study explores whether stimulation of KCRs HcKCR1 and WiChR in cholinergic neurons and muscle cells of Caenorhabditis elegans can induce inhibition during illumination. While inhibition could be achieved, depending on light conditions, the authors unexpectedly also observed excitation. These effects may occur due to a combination of high conductivity of KCRs, and partial conductance of other cations. These findings highlight the need for specific experimental conditions in future studies utilizing these tools. The authors also present conditions that can partially or fully avoid the unwanted depolarizing effects.

neuroscience↗