Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Tiede, D. R.

Publications and source records attributed to Tiede, D. R..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Large increases in resistance training volume do not impair skeletal muscle hypertrophy or anabolic-catabolic molecular signalling in trained individuals

Skeletal muscle hypertrophy results from the integrated regulation of anabolic and proteolytic processes in response to mechanical loading. Although increases in resistance training (RT) volume are used to increase mechanical stress, it remains uncertain whether large and abrupt volume progressions could exceed muscle adaptive capacity by disrupting the balance between anabolic and catabolic signaling. The present study investigated whether a large increase in weekly RT volume (+120%) leads to impaired hypertrophic outcomes and intracellular regulatory responses compared with a modest increase (+20%). Twenty-five resistance-trained men and women (18-35 years old) completed an 8-week randomized, single-blind, within-subject unilateral intervention. Each participant trained both legs twice weekly, with one leg assigned to the large (VOL120) and the contralateral leg to the modest (VOL20) weekly volume progressions relative to habitual training volume. Vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area (mCSA) was assessed by ultrasonography before and after training. Muscle biopsies were obtained at baseline, post-intervention, and 24 h after the last session to quantify muscle fiber cross-sectional area (fCSA), satellite cell myonuclear content, and anabolic/catabolic signaling markers. Both protocols induced increases in mCSA over time (p<0.001), with no protocol vs. time interaction. No significant effects were observed for fCSA nor satellite cell number or myonuclear content. Additionally, molecular responses related to translational regulation and protein degradation were largely similar between protocols. Collectively, these data indicate that a large, abrupt increase in weekly set volume does not impair hypertrophic adaptations or meaningfully alter the anabolic-catabolic signaling profile in resistance-trained individuals.

physiology↗

Resistance training-induced appendicular lean tissue mass changes are largely unrelated to pre-training bone characteristics in a larger cohort of untrained adults

We sought to determine if pre-intervention bone characteristics measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were associated with changes in bone-free lean tissue mass following a period of resistance training in a large cohort of untrained adults (n=119, 62M/57F, 26.0{+/-}4.7 kg/m2, age range = 18-70 years old). Participants completed 10-12 weeks of supervised whole-body resistance training twice weekly, and DXA scans were obtained approximately the same time of day prior to the intervention and 48-72 hours following the final training bout. Associations between baseline skeletal measures (e.g., appendicular bone characteristics, shoulder and hip widths) and training induced changes in appendicular lean mass were examined by estimating correlations between participant-level random slopes (reflecting change over time) and baseline skeletal measures. The same approach was used to evaluate associations between other participant attributes (e.g., age, training volume-load, self-reported energy intake) and appendicular lean tissue mass changes. Modeling was also used to explore whether baseline skeletal characteristics (e.g., shoulder and hip widths) moderated the change in appendicular lean tissue mass from training. All analyses used a Bayesian framework, and interpretation focused on estimated effect sizes and their associated credible intervals rather than formal null hypothesis testing. Strong positive associations were observed between pre-intervention characteristics including dual-arm lean tissue mass and dual-arm bone mineral content (r=0.90), dual-leg lean tissue mass and dual-leg bone mineral content (r=0.86), dual-leg lean tissue mass and pelvic mineral content (r=0.73), and dual-arm lean tissue mass and shoulder width (r=0.76). In contrast, weak associations were observed between training-induced changes in appendicular lean tissue mass versus bone characteristics, training volume-load, self-reported energy intake, self-reported protein intake, BMI, and age (-0.08[&le;]r[&le;] 0.24). After adjusting for sex, multivariable analyses indicated minimal evidence that skeletal characteristics moderated the hypertrophic response to training. These findings do not support a meaningful role of pre-training bone characteristics in influencing the lean tissue mass adaptations to shorter-term resistance training.

physiology↗