Biology subjects

Thrall, E. S.

Publications and source records attributed to Thrall, E. S..

8 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Characterizing the Molecular Determinants of Clamp Binding in B. subtilis

In bacteria, the ring-shaped sliding clamp, DnaN, is an essential component of the replication machinery. The clamp encircles the parental DNA strand during replication and binds DNA polymerases and other replication and repair proteins, helping to tether them at their site of action on the DNA strand. These binding partners interact with the clamp via short pentapeptide or hexapeptide sequences known as clamp-binding motifs (CBMs). Although conserved CBM sequences have been identified across different bacterial species, most studies of clamp binding have been performed in the model gram-negative bacterium Escherichia coli and less is known about clamp binding in other bacterial species. In this study, we investigate clamp binding in the model gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis. We use fluorescence polarization binding assays to quantify binding of a range of CBM peptides to the clamps of both E. coli and B. subtilis. We identify similarities in clamp binding between the two species, including similar importance of different amino acids within the conserved pentapeptide motif. However, our results also reveal differences in clamp binding between the two species. Most notably, we find that, although pentapeptide CBMs bind the E. coli and B. subtilis clamps with similar affinity, hexapeptide CBMs bind an order of magnitude more weakly to the B. subtilis clamp. Our results provide new insight into clamp binding in bacteria and point to possible species-specific differences in this essential interaction.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2026

The B. subtilis translesion polymerase Pol Y1 is not strongly recruited to sites of replication upon different types of DNA damage

One challenge to DNA replication is the presence of unrepaired damage on the template strand, which can stall the replication machinery. This stall can be resolved by the translesion synthesis (TLS) pathway, in which specialized translesion polymerases are recruited to copy damaged DNA. Because TLS polymerases are error-prone, their activity is regulated at multiple levels to minimize unnecessary mutagenesis. Although the molecular mechanisms of bacterial TLS have been extensively studied in Escherichia coli, less is known about this pathway in other species. In E. coli, the TLS polymerase Pol IV is minimally enriched at replication forks in the absence of DNA damage but is strongly recruited upon replication stalling, enabling TLS while minimizing mutagenesis. However, we recently showed that the Bacillus subtilis TLS polymerase Pol Y1, the homolog of Pol IV, is moderately enriched near replication sites even during normal growth and is not further enriched upon treatment with the DNA damaging agent 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide (4-NQO). It is unknown whether this behavior is unique to 4-NQO or general to other types of DNA damage. In this study, we investigate the effects of four different DNA damaging agents (ultraviolet light, methyl methanesulfonate, nitrofurazone, and mitomycin C) in B. subtilis. We first characterize the contributions of the two TLS polymerases, Pol Y1 and Pol Y2, to DNA damage survival and damage-induced mutagenesis after treatment with these agents. We then use single-molecule fluorescence microscopy to measure the localization and dynamics of individual Pol Y1 molecules in live B. subtilis cells. We find that Pol Y1 and Pol Y2 have differing effects on survival and mutagenesis, but that under no circumstances is Pol Y1 strongly recruited to sites of replication upon DNA damage. This study broadens our understanding of TLS in B. subtilis, indicating that there are notable differences in TLS mechanisms across bacteria.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2025

The B. subtilis replicative polymerases bind the sliding clamp with different strengths to tune replication processivity and fidelity

Ring-shaped sliding clamp proteins are essential components of the replication machinery, the replisome, across all domains of life. In bacteria, DNA polymerases bind the sliding clamp, DnaN, through conserved short peptide sequences called clamp-binding motifs. Clamp binding increases the processivity and rate of DNA synthesis and is generally required for polymerase activity. The current understanding of clamp-polymerase interactions was elucidated in the model bacterium Escherichia coli, which has a single replicative polymerase, Pol III. However, many bacteria have two essential replicative polymerases, such as PolC and DnaE in Bacillus subtilis. PolC performs the bulk of DNA synthesis whereas the error-prone DnaE only synthesizes short stretches of DNA on the lagging strand. How the clamp interacts with the two polymerases and coordinates their activity is unknown. We investigated this question by combining in vivo single-molecule fluorescence microscopy with biochemical and microbiological assays. We found that PolC-DnaN binding is essential for replication, although weakening the interaction is tolerated with only minimal effects. In contrast, the DnaE-DnaN interaction is dispensable for replication. Altering the clamp-binding strength of DnaE produces only subtle effects on DnaE cellular localization and dynamics, but it has a substantial impact on mutagenesis. Our results support a model in which DnaE acts distributively during replication but can be stabilized on the DNA template by clamp binding. This study provides new insights into the coordination of multiple replicative polymerases in bacteria and the role of the clamp in polymerase processivity, fidelity, and exchange.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2024

A bipartite interaction with the processivity clamp potentiates Pol IV-mediated TLS

Processivity clamps mediate polymerase switching for translesion synthesis (TLS). All three E. coli TLS polymerases interact with the {beta}2 processivity clamp through a conserved clamp-binding motif (CBM), which is indispensable for TLS. Notably, Pol IV also makes a unique secondary contact with the clamp through non-CBM residues. However, the role of this "rim contact" in Pol IV-mediated TLS remains poorly understood. Here we show that the rim contact is critical for TLS past strong replication blocks. In in vitro reconstituted Pol IV-mediated TLS, ablating the rim contact compromises TLS past 3-methyl dA, a strong block, while barely affecting TLS past N2-furfuryl dG, a weak block. Similar observations are also made in E. coli cells bearing a single copy of these lesions in the genome. Within lesion-stalled replication forks, the rim interaction and ssDNA binding protein cooperatively poise Pol IV to better compete with Pol III for binding to a cleft through its CBM. We propose that this bipartite clamp interaction enables Pol IV to rapidly resolve lesion-stalled replication through TLS at the fork, which reduces damage induced mutagenesis.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2023

The Translesion Polymerase Pol Y1 is a Constitutive Component of the B. subtilis Replication Machinery

Unrepaired DNA damage encountered by the cellular replication machinery can stall DNA replication, ultimately leading to cell death. In the DNA damage tolerance pathway translesion synthesis (TLS), replication stalling is alleviated by the recruitment of specialized polymerases to synthesize short stretches of DNA near a lesion. Although TLS promotes cell survival, most TLS polymerases are low fidelity and must be tightly regulated to avoid harmful mutagenesis. The gram-negative bacterium Escherichia coli has served as the model organism for studies of the molecular mechanisms of bacterial TLS. However, it is poorly understood whether these same mechanisms apply to other bacteria. Here, we use in vivo single-molecule fluorescence microscopy to investigate the TLS polymerase Pol Y1 in the model gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis. We find significant differences in the localization and dynamics of Pol Y1 in comparison to its E. coli homolog, Pol IV. Notably, Pol Y1 is constitutively enriched at or near sites of replication in the absence of DNA damage through interactions with the DnaN clamp; in contrast, Pol IV has been shown to be selectively enriched only upon replication stalling. These results suggest key differences in the roles and mechanisms of regulation of TLS polymerases across different bacterial species.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2022

Replication stalling activates SSB for recruitment of DNA damage tolerance factors

Translesion synthesis (TLS) polymerases bypass DNA lesions that block replicative polymerases, allowing cells to tolerate DNA damage encountered during replication. It is well known that most bacterial TLS polymerases must interact with the sliding clamp processivity factor to carry out TLS, but recent work in Escherichia coli has revealed that single-stranded DNA-binding protein (SSB) plays a key role in enriching the TLS polymerase Pol IV at stalled replication forks in the presence of DNA damage. It remains unclear how this interaction with SSB enriches Pol IV in a stalling-dependent manner given that SSB is always present at the replication fork. In this study we use single-molecule imaging in live E. coli cells to investigate this SSB-dependent enrichment of Pol IV. We find that Pol IV is enriched through its interaction with SSB in response to a range of different replication stresses, and that changes in SSB dynamics at stalled forks may explain this conditional Pol IV enrichment. Finally, we show that other SSB-interacting proteins (SIPs) are likewise selectively enriched in response to replication perturbations, suggesting that this mechanism is likely a general one for enrichment of repair factors near stalled replication forks.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2020

Compartmentalization of the replication fork by single-stranded DNA binding protein regulates translesion synthesis

DNA replication is mediated by the coordinated actions of multiple enzymes within replisomes. Processivity clamps tether many of these enzymes to DNA, allowing access to the primer/template junction. Many clamp-interacting proteins (CLIPs) are involved in genome maintenance pathways including translesion synthesis (TLS). Despite their abundance, DNA replication in bacteria is not perturbed by these CLIPs. Here we show that while the TLS polymerase Pol IV is largely excluded from moving replisomes, the remodeling of ssDNA binding protein (SSB) upon replisome stalling enriches Pol IV at replication forks. This enrichment is indispensable for Pol IV-mediated TLS on both the leading and lagging strands as it enables Pol IV-processivity clamp binding by overcoming the gatekeeping role of the Pol III epsilon subunit. As we have demonstrated for the Pol IV-SSB interaction, we propose that the binding of CLIPs to the processivity clamp must be preceded by interactions with factors that serve as localization markers for their site of action.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2019

A gatekeeping function of the replicative polymerase controls pathway choice in the resolution of lesion-stalled replisomes

DNA lesions stall the replisome and proper resolution of these obstructions is critical for genome stability. Replisomes can directly replicate past a lesion by error-prone translesion synthesis. Alternatively, replisomes can reprime DNA synthesis downstream of the lesion, creating a single-stranded DNA gap that is repaired primarily in an error-free, homology-directed manner. Here we demonstrate how structural changes within the bacterial replisome determine the resolution pathway of lesion-stalled replisomes. This pathway selection is controlled by a dynamic interaction between the proofreading subunit of the replicative polymerase and the processivity clamp, which sets a kinetic barrier to restrict access of TLS polymerases to the primer/template junction. Failure of TLS polymerases to overcome this barrier leads to repriming, which competes kinetically with TLS. Our results demonstrate that independent of its exonuclease activity, the proofreading subunit of the replisome acts as a gatekeeper and influences replication fidelity during the resolution of lesion-stalled replisomes.

biochemistry↗