Biology subjects

Thas, O.

Publications and source records attributed to Thas, O..

12 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Introducing the digital PCR data essentials standard to harmonize data structure for clinical and research use

Digital PCR (dPCR) is a powerful technology for absolute quantification of nucleic acids, valued for its accuracy, sensitivity, and repeatability. Yet, the commercialization of different instruments with proprietary software has introduced challenges to data analysis, interoperability, and comparability. Therefore, we present the Digital PCR Data Essentials Standard (DDES) - a lightweight, human- and machine-readable, and cross-platform data standard developed in collaboration with the dPCR community. The standard consists of three file types designed to enable both manual inspection and automated analysis: (i) a main file summarizing experiment and reaction-level (meta-)data; (ii) an assay file describing targets and detection chemistry, and (iii) intensity files capturing partition-level raw fluorescence data per reaction. DDES supports a wide range of current dPCR applications, including singleplex and multiplex assays, endpoint and real-time readouts, and will be curated to implement future dPCR developments. By harmonizing the data structure, DDES lays out the foundation for FAIR dPCR data practices and supports improved software compatibility, collaborative and reproducible research, and future dPCR data repositories.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2025

Cross-platform digital PCR evaluation of bovine papilloma virus quantification: introducing PCR-ValiPal for Standardized guided assay validation

Digital Polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) enables precise and absolute quantification of nucleic acids by partitioning samples into thousands of individual PCR micro-reactions. While it minimizes the need for standard curves and enhances reproducibility compared to qPCR, thorough assay validation remains crucial. We introduce PCR-ValiPal, a user-friendly web application that standardizes dPCR assay validation steps and streamlines calculations of limit of blank (LOB), limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), precision, trueness, and linearity in accordance with International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 20395:2019. To demonstrate PCR-ValiPals capabilities and the value of method-specific optimization, we use it to validate a novel three-color PCR assay for Bovine Papillomavirus (BPV) types 1 and 2, comparing four platforms: Naica (droplet dPCR), QIAcuity (microwell dPCR), LOAA (real-time dPCR), and CFX96 (qPCR). Using synthetic standards, we assess the platforms performance under identical assay conditions. Naica and QIAcuity showed lower LOB and LOQ values, along with minimal bias for BPV-1, while LOAA demonstrated stable but negative bias. Although qPCR exhibited the highest sensitivity for BPV-2, it was less sensitive at low concentrations for BPV-1. These results underscore the value of method-specific optimization and the usefulness of PCR-ValiPal.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2023

The winner's curse under dependence: repairingempirical Bayes and a comparative study

The winners curse is a form of selection bias that arises when estimates are obtained for a large number of features, but only a subset of most extreme estimates is reported. It occurs in large scale significance testing as well as in rank-based selection, and imperils reproducibility of findings and follow-up study design. Several methods correcting for this selection bias have been proposed, but questions remain on their susceptibility to dependence between features since theoretical analyses and comparative studies are few. We prove that estimation through Tweedies formula is biased in presence of strong dependence, and propose a convolution of its density estimator to restore its competitive performance, which also aids other empirical Bayes methods. Furthermore, we perform a comprehensive simulation study comparing different classes of winners curse correction methods for point estimates as well as confidence intervals under dependence. We find a bootstrap method by Tan et al. (2015) and empirical Bayes methods with density convolution to perform best at correcting the selection bias, although this correction generally does not improve the feature ranking. Finally, we apply the methods to a comparison of single-feature versus multi-feature prediction models in predicting Brassica napus phenotypes from gene expression data, demonstrating that the superiority of the best single-feature model may be illusory.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2023

Flexible Methods for Standard Error Calculation in digital PCR Experiments

Digital PCR (dPCR) is a highly accurate and precise technique for the quantification of target nucleic acid(s) in a biological sample. This digital quantification relies on the binomial or Poisson distribution to estimate the amount of target molecules based on positive and negative partitions. However, the implementation of these distributions require adherence to underlying assumptions that are often neglected, leading to a suboptimal (too optimistic) variance estimation of the target concentration, especially when considering the multiple sources of variation in experimental dPCR setups. Moreover, these parametric methods cannot be easily used for downstream statistical inference when more advanced analysis are required, such as for copy number variation. We evaluated the performance of three new statistical methods (BootsVar, NonPVar, BinomVar) in both simulations and real-life datasets for target and variance estimation in dPCR setups while taking into account a combination of commonly observed sources of experimental variability that can interfere with the underlying assumptions of the current parametric methods. The results demonstrate the capability of the new methods for variance estimation and present a more accurate reflection of the true variability over the classical binomial approach. In addition, these statistical methods are flexible and generic in the way that they work well for the variance estimation of non-linear statistics that work with ratios (e.g. CNV) and for multiplex dPCR setups. In this study, we provide guidelines when to use the binomial-assumption based methods and when the non-parametric one is better to achieve more accurate variance estimates.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2022

Large-scale benchmarking of circRNA detection tools reveals large differences in sensitivity but not in precision

The detection of circular RNA molecules (circRNAs) is typically based on short-read RNA sequencing data processed by computational detection tools. During the last decade, a plethora of such tools have been developed, but a systematic comparison with orthogonal validation is missing. Here, we set up a circRNA detection tool benchmarking study, in which 16 tools were used and detected over 315,000 unique circRNAs in three deeply sequenced human cell types. Next, 1,516 predicted circRNAs were empirically validated using three orthogonal methods. Generally, tool-specific precision values are high and similar (median of 98.8%, 96.3%, and 95.5% for qPCR, RNase R, and amplicon sequencing, respectively) whereas the sensitivity and number of predicted circRNAs (ranging from 1,372 to 58,032) are the most significant tool differentiators. Furthermore, we demonstrate the complementarity of tools through the increase in detection sensitivity by considering the union of highly-precise tool combinations while keeping the number of false discoveries low. Finally, based on the benchmarking results, recommendations are put forward for circRNA detection and validation.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2020

Comprehensive benchmarking of single cell RNA sequencing technologies for characterizing cellular perturbation

Technological advances in transcriptome sequencing of single cells continues to provide an unprecedented view on tissue composition and cellular heterogeneity. While several studies have compared different single cell RNA-seq methods with respect to data quality and their ability to distinguish cell subpopulations, none of these studies investigated the heterogeneity of the cellular transcriptional response upon a chemical perturbation. In this study, we evaluated the transcriptional response of NGP neuroblastoma cells upon nutlin-3 treatment using the C1, ddSeq and Chromium single cell systems. These devices and library preparation methods are representative for the wide variety of platforms, ranging from microfluid chips to droplet-based systems and from full transcript sequencing to 3-prime end sequencing. In parallel, we used bulk RNA-seq for molecular characterization of the transcriptional response. Two complementary metrics to evaluate performance were applied: the first is the number and identity of differentially expressed genes as defined in consensus by two statistical models, and the second is the enrichment analysis of biological signals. Where relevant, to make the data more comparable, we downsampled sequencing library size, selected cell subpopulations based on specific RNA abundance features, or created pseudobulk samples. While the C1 detects the highest number of genes per cell and better resembles bulk RNA-seq, the Chromium identifies most differentially expressed genes, albeit still substantially fewer than bulk RNA-seq. Gene set enrichment analyses reveals that detection of a limited set of the most abundant genes in single cell RNA-seq experiments is sufficient for molecular phenotyping. Finally, single cell RNA-seq reveals a heterogeneous response of NGP neuroblastoma cells upon nutlin-3 treatment, revealing putative late-responder or resistant cells, both undetected in bulk RNA-seq experiments.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2019

Probabilistic index models for testing differential expression in single cell RNA sequencing data

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) technologies profile gene expression patterns in individual cells. It is often of interest to test for differential expression (DE) between conditions, e.g. treatment vs control or between cell types. Simulation studies have shown that non-parametric tests, such as the Wilcoxon-rank sum test, can robustly detect significant DE, with better performance than many parametric tools specifically developed for scRNA-seq data analysis. However, these rank tests cannot be used for complex experimental designs involving multiple groups, multiple factors and confounding variables. Further, rank based tests do not provide an interpretable measure of the effect size. We propose a semi-parametric approach based on probabilistic index models (PIM) that form a flexible class of models that generalize classical rank tests. Our method does not rely on strong distributional assumptions and it allows accounting for confounding factors. Moreover, it allows for the estimation of the effect size in terms of a probabilistic index. Real data analysis demonstrate that PIM is capable of identifying biologically meaningful DE. Our simulation studies also show that DE tests succeed well in controlling the false discovery rate at its nominal level, while maintaining good sensitivity as compared to competing methods.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2019

SPsimSeq: semi-parametric simulation of bulk and single cell RNA sequencing data

SPsimSeq is a semi-parametric simulation method for bulk and single cell RNA sequencing data. It simulates data from a good estimate of the actual distribution of a given real RNA-seq dataset. In contrast to existing approaches that assume a particular data distribution, our method constructs an empirical distribution of gene expression data from a given source RNA-seq experiment to faithfully capture the data characteristics of real data. Importantly, our method can be used to simulate a wide range of scenarios, such as single or multiple biological groups, systematic variations (e.g. confounding batch effects), and different sample sizes. It can also be used to simulate different gene expression units resulting from different library preparation protocols, such as read counts or UMI counts.\n\nAvailability and implementationThe R package and associated documentation is available from https://github.com/CenterForStatistics-UGent/SPsimSeq.\n\nSupplementary informationSupplementary data are available at bioR{chi}iv online.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2019

SPECS: A non-parameteric method to identify tissue-specific molecular features for unbalanced sample groups

To understand biology and differences among various tissues or cell types, one typically searches for molecular features that display characteristic abundance patterns. Several specificity metrics have been introduced to identify tissue-specific molecular features, but these either require an equal number of replicates per tissue or they cant handle replicates at all. We describe a non-parametric specificity score that is compatible with unequal sample group sizes. To demonstrate its usefulness, the specificity score was calculated on all GTEx samples, detecting known and novel tissue-specific genes. A webtool was developed to browse these results for genes or tissues of interest. An example python implementation of SPECS is available at https://github.ugent.be/ceeverae/SPECs. The precalculated SPECS results on the GTEx data are available through a user-friendly browser at specs.cmgg.be.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2018

A unified framework for unconstrained and constrained ordination of microbiome read count data

Explorative visualization techniques provide a first summary of microbiome read count datasets through dimension reduction. A plethora of dimension reduction methods exists, but many of them focus primarily on sample ordination, failing to elucidate the role of the bacterial species. Moreover, implicit but often unrealistic assumptions underlying these methods fail to account for overdispersion and differences in sequencing depth, which are two typical characteristics of sequencing data. We combine log-linear models with a dispersion estimation algorithm and flexible response function modelling into a framework for unconstrained and constrained ordination. The method allows easy filtering of technical confounders. As opposed to most existing ordination methods, the assumptions underlying the method are stated explicitly and can be verified using simple diagnostics. The combination of unconstrained and constrained ordination in the same framework is unique in the field and greatly facilitates microbiome data exploration. We illustrate the advantages of our method on simulated and real datasets, while pointing out flaws in existing methods. The algorithms for fitting and plotting are available in the R-package RCM.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2018

A Comprehensive Overview Of Genomic Imprinting In Breast & Its Deregulation In Cancer

Genomic imprinting, the parent-of-origin specific monoallelic expression of genes, plays an important role in growth and development. Loss of imprinting of individual genes has been found in varying cancers, yet data-analytical challenges have impeded systematic studies so far. We developed a mixture distribution model to detect monoallelically expressed loci in a genome-wide manner without the need for genotyping data, and applied the methodology on TCGA breast tissue RNA-seq data. We identified 35 putatively imprinted genes in healthy breast. In breast cancer however, HM13 was featured by significant loss of imprinting and expression upregulation, which could be linked to DNA demethylation. Other imprinted genes (25 out of 35) demonstrated consistent expression downregulation in breast cancer, which often correlated with loss of imprinting. A breast imprinted gene network, deregulated in cancer, might hence be present. In summary, our novel methodology highlights the massive deregulation of imprinting in breast cancer.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2017

Differential gene expression analysis tools exhibit substandard performance for long non-coding RNA-sequencing data

BackgroundProtein-coding RNAs (mRNA) have been the primary target of most transcriptome studies in the past, but in recent years, attention has expanded to include long non-coding RNAs (lncRNA). lncRNAs are typically expressed at low levels, and are inherently highly variable. This is a fundamental challenge for differential expression (DE) analysis. In this study, the performance of 14 popular tools for testing DE in RNA-seq data along with their normalization methods is comprehensively evaluated, with a particular focus on lncRNAs and low abundant mRNAs.\n\nResultsThirteen performance metrics were used to evaluate DE tools and normalization methods using simulations and analyses of six diverse RNA-seq datasets. Non-parametric procedures are used to simulate gene expression data in such a way that realistic levels of expression and variability are preserved in the simulated data. Throughout the assessment, we kept track of the results for mRNA and lncRNA separately. All statistical models exhibited inferior performance for lncRNAs compared to mRNAs across all simulated scenarios and analysis of benchmark RNA-seq datasets. No single tool uniformly outperformed the others.\n\nConclusionOverall, the linear modeling with empirical Bayes moderation (limma) and the nonparametric approach (SAMSeq) showed best performance: good control of the false discovery rate (FDR) and reasonable sensitivity. However, for achieving a sensitivity of at least 50%, more than 80 samples are required when studying expression levels in a realistic clinical settings such as in cancer research. About half of the methods showed severe excess of false discoveries, making these methods unreliable for differential expression analysis and jeopardizing reproducible science. The detailed results of our study can be consulted through a user-friendly web application, http://statapps.ugent.be/tools/AppDGE/

genomics↗