Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Tejeda, G.

Publications and source records attributed to Tejeda, G..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

CREG1 promotes autophagy and protects the heart against nutritional stress-induced injury and age-associated hypertrophy, fibrosis and diastolic dysfunction

BackgroundCellular repressor of E1A-stimulated genes 1 (CREG1) is an evolutionarily conserved endolysosomal glycoprotein that enhances lysosomal biogenesis and autophagy, suppresses proliferation, and promotes differentiation. A prior gene targeting strategy that produced truncated N-terminal fragments resulted in embryonic lethality, limiting the ability to assess the physiological role of complete CREG1 loss. We hypothesized that CREG1 regulates cardiac autophagy, thereby maintaining cardiac structure and function under both physiological and stress conditions. MethodsWe generated true Creg1 knockout (KO) mice by deleting the entire open reading frame and established a gain-of-function model by inserting human CREG1 into the Rosa26 locus. Cardiac structure and function were assessed in global and cardiomyocyte-specific Creg1 knockout (cmCreg1KO) and knock-in (cmCREG1KI) mice. Autophagy was evaluated using biochemical assays, immunofluorescence, electron microscopy, and the CAG-EGFP-RFP-LC3 reporter analysis. ResultsGlobal Creg1 knockout mice developed progressive cardiac hypertrophy, fibrosis, and diastolic dysfunction at [~]80 weeks of age. At younger ages, CREG1 deficiency increased susceptibility to nutritional stress, resulting in mitochondrial damage and myofiber disruption in cardiomyocytes. cmCreg1KO mice exhibited dilated cardiomyopathy, left atrial thrombosis, and lethality around 50 weeks of age; however, interpretation of disease severity is confounded by Myh6-Cre-associated cardiotoxicity, which may mask additional pathogenic effects attributable to CREG1 loss. In contrast, cmCREG1KI mice demonstrated enhanced exercise capacity under nutritional stress. Mechanistically, CREG1 was localized to endolysosomal and autophagosomal compartments. Loss of CREG1 impaired autophagy flux and mitophagy, likely due to defective autophagosome membrane expansion and degradation. In contrast, CREG1 overexpression enhanced autophagy in cardiomyocytes. ConclusionsCREG1 is a key regulator of cardiac autophagy, protecting the heart against nutritional stress-induced injury and age-associated cardiac hypertrophy, fibrosis, and diastolic dysfunction. Graphic Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=171 SRC="FIGDIR/small/687936v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1000"> View larger version (60K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1b9fc05org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@150e48aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1cc47adorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@75ed53_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

cell biology↗

Evaluation of distal facial nerve branches contribution to facial nerve paralysis in rodents

Introduction/AimsFacial nerve paralysis is a complex and devastating condition. Translational research of facial paralysis recovery remains largely limited to animal studies, for which there are many potential models employed. When studying facial nerve regeneration in rodents, it is important to understand the converging contributions of the motor supply into the whisker pad. A consensus surgical approach and animal model has yet to be defined. Of particular interest for movement of the nose and whiskers are the buccal and marginal mandibular nerves. This study aims to evaluate how these distal nerve branches contribute to facial nerve paralysis and identify key morphological changes at the neuromuscular junctions (NMJs) in the whisker pad of rodents. MethodsAdult rats underwent isolated transection of the buccal branch of the facial nerve, both the buccal and marginal mandibular branches of the facial nerve, or control sham surgery. ResultsHistological, electrophysiological, and behavior assessments confirmed that the transection of the buccal branch alone did not cease whisker movement in rats, but when combined with a transection of the marginal mandibular branch, it resulted in full paralysis of the whisker and nose movement. DiscussionThese results are indicative of the distinct roles of these nerves branches in facial paralysis repair following a transection injury. Further, our results suggest additional targets for facial nerve repair treatments.

neuroscience↗