Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Taylor, M. P.

Publications and source records attributed to Taylor, M. P..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Superinfection Exclusion of Alphaherpesviruses Interferes with Virion Trafficking

Superinfection exclusion (SIE) is a phenomenon in which a primary viral infection interferes with secondary viral infections within that same cell. Although SIE has been observed across many viruses, it has remained relatively understudied. A recently characterized glycoprotein D (gD) -independent SIE of alphaherpesviruses presents a novel mechanism of co-infection restriction for Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 (HSV-1) and Pseudorabies virus (PRV). In this study, we evaluated the role of multiplicity of infection (MOI), receptor expression, and trafficking of virions to gain greater insight into potential mechanisms of alphaherpesvirus SIE. We observed that high MOI secondary viral infections were able to overcome SIE in a manner that was independent of receptor availability. Utilizing recombinant viruses expressing fluorescent protein fusions, we assessed virion localization during SIE through live fluorescent microscopy of dual-labeled virions and localization of capsid assemblies. Analysis of these assemblies confirmed changes in the distribution of capsids during SIE. These results indicate that SIE during PRV infection inhibits viral entry or fusion while HSV-1 SIE inhibits infection through a post-entry mechanism. Although the timing and phenotype of SIE is similar between alphaherpesviruses, the related viruses implement different mechanisms to restrict coinfection. IMPORTANCEMost viruses utilize a form of superinfection exclusion to conserve resources and control population dynamics. gD-dependent superinfection exclusion in alphaherpesviruses is well-documented. However, the under-characterized gD-independent SIE provides new insight into how alphaherpesviruses limit sequential infection. The observations described here demonstrate that gD-independent SIE differs between PRV and HSV-1. Comparing these differences provide new insights into the underlying mechanisms of SIE implemented by two related viruses.

microbiology↗

Effects of inactivation method on SARS-CoV-2 virion proteins and structure

The risk posed by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus -2 (SARS-CoV-2) dictates that live-virus research is conducted in a biosafety level 3 (BSL3) facility. Working with SARS-CoV-2 at lower biosafety levels can expedite research yet requires the virus to be fully inactivated. In this study, we validated and compared two protocols for inactivating SARS-CoV-2: heat treatment and ultraviolet irradiation. The two methods were optimized to render the virus completely incapable of infection while limiting destructive effects of inactivation. We observed that 15 minutes of incubation at 65{degrees}C completely inactivates high titer viral stocks. Complete inactivation was also achieved with minimal amounts of UV power (70,000 J/cm2), which is 100-fold less power than comparable studies. Once validated, the two methods were then compared for viral RNA quantification, virion purification, and antibody recognition. We observed that UV irradiation resulted in a 2-log reduction of detectable genomes compared to heat inactivation. Protein yield following virion enrichment was equivalent for all inactivation conditions, but the resulting viral proteins and virions were negatively impacted by inactivation method and time. We outline the strengths and weaknesses of each method so that investigators might choose the one which best meets their research goals.

microbiology↗