Biology subjects

Tavtigian, S. V.

Publications and source records attributed to Tavtigian, S. V..

8 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

Calibration of additional computational tools expands ClinGen recommendation options for variant classification with PP3/BP4 criteria

PurposeWe previously developed an approach to calibrate computational tools for clinical variant classification, updating recommendations for the reliable use of variant impact predictors to provide evidence strength up to Strong. A new generation of tools using distinctive approaches have since been released, and these methods must be independently calibrated for clinical application. MethodUsing our local posterior probability-based calibration and our established data set of ClinVar pathogenic and benign variants, we determined the strength of evidence provided by three new tools (AlphaMissense, ESM1b, VARITY) and calibrated scores meeting each evidence strength. Results All three tools reached the Strong level of evidence for variant pathogenicity and Moderate for benignity, though sometimes for few variants. Compared to previously recommended tools, these yielded at best only modest improvements in the tradeoffs of evidence strength and false positive predictions. ConclusionAt calibrated thresholds, three new computational predictors provided evidence for variant pathogenicity at similar strength to the four previously recommended predictors (and comparable with functional assays for some variants). This calibration broadens the scope of computational tools for application in clinical variant classification. Their new approaches offer promise for future advancement of the field.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2022

Evidence-based calibration of computational tools for missense variant pathogenicity classification and ClinGen recommendations for clinical use of PP3/BP4 criteria

Recommendations from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) for interpreting sequence variants specify the use of computational predictors as Supporting level of evidence for pathogenicity or benignity using criteria PP3 and BP4, respectively. However, score intervals defined by tool developers, and ACMG/AMP recommendations that require the consensus of multiple predictors, lack quantitative support. Previously, we described a probabilistic framework that quantified the strengths of evidence (Supporting, Moderate, Strong, Very Strong) within ACMG/AMP recommendations. We have extended this framework to computational predictors and introduce a new standard that converts a tools scores to PP3 and BP4 evidence strengths. Our approach is based on estimating the local positive predictive value and can calibrate any computational tool or other continuous-scale evidence on any variant type. We estimate thresholds (score intervals) corresponding to each strength of evidence for pathogenicity and benignity for thirteen missense variant interpretation tools, using carefully assembled independent data sets. Most tools achieved Supporting evidence level for both pathogenic and benign classification using newly established thresholds. Multiple tools reached score thresholds justifying Moderate and several reached Strong evidence levels. One tool reached Very Strong evidence level for benign classification on some variants. Based on these findings, we provide recommendations for evidence-based revisions of the PP3 and BP4 ACMG/AMP criteria using individual tools and future assessment of computational methods for clinical interpretation.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2021

A calibrated cell-based functional assay to aide classification of MLH1 DNA mismatch repair gene variants

PURPOSEFunctional assays provide important evidence for classifying the disease significance of germline variants in the DNA mismatch repair genes. We sought to develop a cell-based approach for testing the function of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in the MLH1 gene. METHODSUsing CRISPR gene editing, we knocked-in MLH1 VUS into the endogenous MLH1 loci in human embryonic stem cells. We examined their impact at the RNA and protein level, including their ability to maintain stability of microsatellite sequences and instigate a DNA damage response. We calibrated these assays by testing well-established pathogenic and benign control variants. RESULTSFive VUS resulted in functionally abnormal protein, 15 VUS resulted in functionally normal protein, and one VUS showed mixed results. Furthermore, we converted the functional outputs into a single odds in favor of pathogenicity score for each VUS. CONCLUSIONOur CRISPR-based functional assay successfully models phenotypes observed in patients in a cellular context. Using this approach, we generated evidence for or against pathogenicity for utilization by variant classification expert panels. Ultimately, this information will assist in proper diagnosis and disease management for suspected Lynch syndrome patients.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2019

A novel ribosomal protein 20 variant in a family with unexplained colorectal cancer and polyposis

Colorectal cancer (CRC) has a large hereditary component, which is only partially explained by known genetic causes. Recently, variants in ribosomal protein S20 (RPS20, [OMIM: 603682]) were identified in a family with familial CRC type X and in a CRC cancer case-control screen. This study describes a novel splice donor variant in RPS20, NM_001023.3:c.177+1G>A. It segregates with CRC [OMIM: 114500] and polyposis [HP: 0200063] within the probands family. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) confirms the variant results in two aberrantly-spliced transcripts that are absent in controls. The location of the novel RPS20 variant is near two previously-reported truncating RPS20 variants associated with CRC. DNA from colon adenocarcinoma showed no evidence of loss-of-heterozygosity, supporting a haploinsufficiency or dominant negative disease mechanism. These findings support designation of RPS20 as a CRC predisposition gene, and expand the phenotypic spectrum of RPS20 truncating variants to include polyposis.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2019

Evaluation of ACMG Rules for In silico Evidence Strength Using An Independent Computational Tool Absent of Circularities on ATM and CHEK2 Breast Cancer Cases and Controls

The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines for sequence variant classification include two criteria, PP3 and BP4, for combining computational data with other evidence types contributing to sequence variant classification. PP3 and BP4 assert that computational modeling can provide \"Supporting\" evidence for or against pathogenicity within the ACMG framework. Here, leveraging a meta-analysis of ATM and CHEK2 breast cancer case-control mutation screening data, we evaluate the strength of evidence determined from the relatively simple computational tool Align-GVGD. Importantly, application of Align-GVGD to these ATM and CHEK2 data is free of logical circularities, hidden multiple testing, and use of other ACMG evidence types. For both genes, rare missense substitutions that are assigned the most severe Align-GVGD grade exceed a \"Moderate pathogenic\" evidence threshold when analyzed in a Bayesian framework; accordingly, we argue that the ACMG classification rules be updated for well-calibrated computational tools. Additionally, congruent with previous analyses of ATM and CHEK2 case-control mutation screening data, we find that both genes have a considerable burden of pathogenic missense substitutions, and that severe ATM rare missense have increased odds ratios compared to truncating and splice junction variants, indicative of a potential dominant-negative effect for those missense substitutions.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2019

Recommendations for application of the functional evidence PS3/BS3 criterion using the ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation framework

BackgroundThe American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)/Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) clinical variant interpretation guidelines established criteria (PS3/BS3) for functional assays that specified a \"strong\" level of evidence. However, they did not provide detailed guidance on how functional evidence should be evaluated, and differences in the application of the PS3/BS3 codes is a contributor to variant interpretation discordance between laboratories. This recommendation seeks to provide a more structured approach to the assessment of functional assays for variant interpretation and guidance on the use of various levels of strength based on assay validation.\n\nMethodsThe Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) Sequence Variant Interpretation (SVI) Working Group used curated functional evidence from ClinGen Variant Curation Expert Panel-developed rule specifications and expert opinions to refine the PS3/BS3 criteria over multiple in-person and virtual meetings. We estimated odds of pathogenicity for assays using various numbers of variant controls to determine the minimum controls required to reach moderate level evidence. Feedback from the ClinGen Steering Committee and outside experts were incorporated into the recommendations at multiple stages of development.\n\nResultsThe SVI Working Group developed recommendations for evaluators regarding the assessment of the clinical validity of functional data and a four-step provisional framework to determine the appropriate strength of evidence that can be applied in clinical variant interpretation. These steps are: 1. Define the disease mechanism; 2. Evaluate applicability of general classes of assays used in the field; 3. Evaluate validity of specific instances of assays; 4. Apply evidence to individual variant interpretation. We found that a minimum of eleven total pathogenic and benign variant controls are required to reach moderate-level evidence in the absence of rigorous statistical analysis.\n\nConclusionsThe recommendations and approach to functional evidence evaluation described here should help clarify the clinical variant interpretation process for functional assays. Further, we hope that these recommendations will help develop productive partnerships with basic scientists who have developed functional assays that are useful for interrogating the function of a variety of genes.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2017

Universal Panel Testing of Pancreatic Cancer Cases for Cancer Predisposition

Background and AimsGenes associated with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) susceptibility have been shown to play a role in pancreatic cancer susceptibility. Germline genetic testing of pancreatic cancer cases could be beneficial for at-risk relatives with pathogenic variants in established HBOC and CRC genes, but it is unclear what proportion of pancreatic cancer cases harbor pathogenic variants in these genes.\n\nMethods66 pancreatic cancer cases, unselected for family history and diagnosed at the Huntsman Cancer Hospital (HCH), were sequenced on a custom 34-gene panel including known HBOC and CRC genes. A second set of 156 unselected HCH pancreatic cancer cases were sequenced on an expanded 59-gene panel (n=95) or with a custom 14-gene clinical panel (n=61). Sequencing data from both sets of pancreatic cancer cases, the pancreatic cancer cases of the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), and an unselected pancreatic cancer screen from the Mayo Clinic were combined in a meta-analysis to estimate the proportion of carriers with pathogenic and variants of uncertain significance.\n\nResultsApproximately 8.9% of unselected pancreatic cancer cases at the HCH carried a variant with potential HBOC or CRC screening recommendations. A meta-analysis of unselected pancreatic cancer cases revealed that approximately 10.5% carry a pathogenic variant or HiP-VUS.\n\nConclusionWith the inclusion of both HBOC and CRC susceptibility genes in a panel test, unselected pancreatic cancer cases have a high enough percentage of carriers to rationalize genetic testing for identification of variants that could be further used in cascade testing of healthy relatives to increase HBOC and CRC surveillance measures.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2016

Resolving the Functional Significance of BRCA1 RING Domain Missense Substitutions

Part 1Development and calibration of suitably accurate functional assays for BRCA1 RING domain and BRCT domain missense substitutions could dramatically accelerate clinical classification of rare missense substitutions observed in that gene. Leveraging data from 68,000 full sequence tests of BRCA1 and BRCA2, plus data from the limited number of already classified BRCA1 RING domain missense substitutions, we used logistic regression and related techniques to evaluate three BRCA1 RING domain assays. These were recently described high throughput yeast 2-hybrid and E3 ubiquitin ligase assays, plus a newly developed mammalian 2-hybrid assay. While there were concerns about the accuracy of the yeast 2-hybrid assay and the indirect nature of the ubiquitin ligase assay, the mammalian 2-hybrid assay had excellent correlation with existing missense substitution classifications. After calibration, this assay contributed to classification of one newly reported BRCA1 missense substitution. In principal, the mammalian 2-hybrid assay could be converted to a high-throughput format that would likely retain suitable accuracy. Part 2How does one achieve clinically applicable classification of the vast majority of all possible sequence variants in disease susceptibility genes? BRCA1 is a high-risk susceptibility gene for breast and ovarian cancer. Pathogenic protein truncating variants are scattered across the open reading frame, but all known missense substitutions that are pathogenic because of missense dysfunction are located in either the amino-terminal RING domain or the carboxy-terminal BRCT domain. Heterodimerization of the BRCA1 and BARD1 RING domains is a molecularly defined obligate activity. Hence, we tested every BRCA1 RING domain missense substitution that can be created by a single nucleotide change for heterodimerization with BARD1 in a Mammalian 2-hybrid (M2H) assay. Downstream of the M2H laboratory assay, we addressed three additional challenges: assay calibration, validation thereof, and integration of the calibrated results with other available data such as computational evidence and patient/population observational data to achieve clinically applicable classification. Overall, we found that about 20% of BRCA1 RING domain missense substitutions are pathogenic. Using a Bayesian point system for data integration and variant classification, we achieved clinical classification of about 89% of observed missense substitutions. Moreover, among missense substitutions not present in the human observational data used here, we find an additional 47 with concordant computational and functional assay evidence in favor of pathogenicity; these are particularly likely to be classified as Likely Pathogenic once human observational data become available.

genetics↗