Taussig, D. C. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2025

DEK::NUP214 acts as an XPO1-dependent transcriptional activator of essential leukemia genes

The t(6;9)(p22.3;q34.1) translocation/DEK::NUP214 fusion protein defines a distinct subgroup of younger AML patients classified as a separate disease entity by the World Health Organization. DEK is a nuclear factor with multifunctional roles, including gene regulation, while its fusion partner, NUP214, plays a pivotal role in nuclear export by interacting with transport receptors such as XPO1. However, the precise mechanism by which DEK::NUP214 drives leukemia remains unclear. A comprehensive multi-omics comparison of 57 AML primary samples (including whole genome sequencing, targeted sequencing, transcriptomics, and drug screening with > 500 compounds) revealed that t(6;9) cases display a selective response to XPO1 inhibitors (Selinexor & Eltanexor) and a distinct transcriptomic signature characterized by the overexpression of FOXC1 and HOX genes that are key leukemia mediators. CUT&RUN experiments demonstrated the direct binding of DEK::NUP214 to the promoters of FOXC1 and HOXA/B clusters. Strikingly, the expression of these genes and the binding of DEK::NUP214 to their regulatory regions were selectively reduced upon XPO1 inhibition in t(6;9) cells. Altogether, these results identified a novel function of DEK::NUP214 as an XPO1-dependent transcriptional activator of key leukemia drivers and provide a rationale to explore the use of XPO1 inhibitors in this patient population.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2022

Integrative phosphoproteomics defines two biologically distinct groups of KMT2A rearranged acute myeloid leukaemia with different drug response phenotypes

Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients harbouring certain chromosome abnormalities have particularly adverse prognosis. For these patients, targeted therapies have not yet made a significant clinical impact. To understand the molecular landscape of poor prognosis AML we profiled 74 patients from two different centres (in UK and Finland) at the proteomic, phosphoproteomic and drug response phenotypic levels. These data were complemented with transcriptomics analysis for 39 cases. Data integration highlighted a phosphoproteomics signature that define two biologically distinct groups of KMT2A rearranged leukaemia, which we term MLLGA and MLLGB. MLLGA presented increased DOT1L phosphorylation, HOXA gene expression, CDK1 activity and phosphorylation of proteins involved in RNA metabolism, replication and DNA damage when compared to MLLGB and no KMT2A rearranged samples. MLLGA was particularly sensitive to 15 compounds including genotoxic drugs and inhibitors of mitotic kinases and inosine-5-monosphosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) relative to other cases. Intermediate-risk KMT2A-MLLT3 cases were mainly represented in a third group closer to MLLGA than to MLLGB. The expression of IMPDH2 and multiple nucleolar proteins was higher in MLLGA and correlated with the response to IMPDH inhibition in KMT2A rearranged leukaemia, suggesting a role of the nucleolar activity in sensitivity to treatment. In summary, our multilayer molecular profiling of AML with poor prognosis and KMT2A-MLLT3 karyotypes identified a phosphoproteomics signature that defines two biologically and phenotypically distinct groups of KMT2A rearranged leukaemia. These data provide a rationale for the potential development of specific therapies for AML patients characterised by the MLLGA phosphoproteomics signature identified in this study.

molecular biology↗