Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Taupin, J.-L.

Publications and source records attributed to Taupin, J.-L..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Non-HLA antibodies worsen the histological phenotype and prognosis of antibody mediated rejection in kidney allografts

IntroductionAntibody-mediated rejection (AMR) remains a leading cause of kidney allograft failure, with both HLA and non-HLA antibodies implicated in its pathogenesis. The contribution of non-HLA antibodies (non-HLA Abs) to microvascular inflammation (MVI) and graft outcome, particularly in cases lacking donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (HLA-DSAs), remains incompletely understood. MethodsWe analyzed 571 post-transplant serum samples from 326 patients with histological features of AMR (AMRh) and 164 stable controls. Non-HLA Abs were detected using the previously developed Non-HLA Antibody Detection Immunoassay (NHADIA), and associations were examined with histological lesions, AMRh persistence, and graft outcomes. Biopsies were scored according to Banff 2022 criteria, and patients were stratified by HLA-DSA and NHADIA status. ResultsNHADIA values were significantly higher in AMRh patients compared to controls (P=0.0001), regardless of HLA-DSA status. NHADIA values correlated with the severity of glomerulitis, peritubular capillaritis and global MVI scores. In AMRh patients with HLA-DSAs, non-HLA Abs remained independently associated with MVI severity. Follow-up biopsies revealed persistent AMR lesions in patients with both HLA-DSAs and non-HLA Abs. Allograft survival was lowest in double-positive patients, and NHADIA positivity independently predicted graft loss (HR=2.25, 95% CI: 1.03-4.92, P=0.042). Incorporating NHADIA into the Banff classification reclassified 61% of AMRh cases as "double-positive AMRh," and identified new subgroups with significant prognostic differences. ConclusionPost-transplant detection of non-HLA antibodies identifies a distinct subset of AMR with more severe histology and worse graft prognosis, particularly when coexisting with HLA-DSAs. Integrating non-HLA Ab testing into current diagnostic frameworks may refine AMR classification and improve risk stratification. TRANSLATIONAL STATEMENTThis study highlights the clinical relevance of non-HLA antibodies, identified using our innovative endothelial cell-based assay (NHADIA), in kidney transplant recipients. Their presence is associated with more severe antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and poorer graft outcomes, even in the absence of donor-specific HLA antibodies. Incorporating non-HLA antibody detection into routine post-transplant evaluation may allow clinicians to better identify high-risk patients, including those previously classified as DSA-negative AMR. This expanded immunological profiling refines AMR diagnosis, improves risk stratification, and opens new avenues for personalized immunosuppressive strategies, ultimately enhancing long-term graft survival and patient care.

pathology↗

HLA-EpiCheck: A B-cell epitope prediction tool for HLA proteins using molecular dynamics simulation data.

1The Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) system is the main cause of organ transplant loss through the recognition of HLA proteins by Donor-Specific Antibodies (DSA). Therefore, the identification of potentially immunogenic epitopes is a key task to refine organ allocation and then to improve the survival of transplanted organs. Here, we present HLA-EpiCheck, a machine learning predictor for B-cell epitopes on HLA proteins that leverages an unprecedented dataset of high-quality molecular dynamics simulations of 207 HLA proteins. Candidate epitopes are represented as surface patches centered on solvent-accessible residues and described by a set of 18 descriptors. The descriptors include both static and dynamic properties, such as hydrophobicity, electrostatic charges, relative solvent-accessible surface area and side-chain flexibility. The HLA-EpiCheck was trained using an Extra Trees ensemble learning method and was compared to DiscoTope-3.0, a state-of-the-art B-cell epitope predictor. HLA-EpiCheck largely outperformed DiscoTope-3.0 in the task of predicting HLA epitopes. HLA-EpiCheck was also used to assess the epitope status of a subset of non-confirmed eplets. The predictions were compared to experimental data and a notable consistency was found. These results suggest that HLA-EpiCheck could be used to better define HLA matching between donor and recipient to reduce de novo DSA formation and graft rejection.

bioinformatics↗

CD28 costimulatory domain protects against tonic signaling-induced functional impairment in CAR-Tregs

The use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered regulatory T cells (Tregs) has emerged as a promising strategy to promote immune tolerance in transplantation. However, in conventional T cells (Tconvs), CAR expression is often associated with tonic signaling resulting from ligand-independent baseline activation. Tonic signaling may cause CAR-T cell dysfunction, especially when the CAR structure incorporates the CD28 costimulatory domain (CSD) rather than the 4-1BB CSD. Here, we explored the impact of tonic signaling on human CAR-Tregs according to the type of CSD. Compared to CD28-CAR-Tregs, 4-1BB-CAR-Tregs showed enhanced proliferation and greater activation of MAP kinase and mTOR pathways but exhibited decreased lineage stability and reduced abilities to produce IL-10 and be restimulated through the CAR. Although both CAR-Treg populations were suppressive in vivo, cell tracking with bioluminescence imaging found longer persistence for CD28-CAR-Tregs than for 4-1BB-CAR-Tregs. This study demonstrates that CD28-CAR best preserves Treg function and survival in the context of tonic signaling, in contrast with previous findings for Tconvs. SUMMARYLamarthee et al investigated the impact of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) tonic signaling on CAR-engineered Tregs according to the incorporated costimulatory domain (either CD28 or 4-1BB). CD28 ameliorated Treg stability, long-term survival and function compared to 4-1BB.

immunology↗