Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Tansey, R.

Publications and source records attributed to Tansey, R..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Individualized network topography in pre-adolescent children and adults using naturalistic precision fMRI

Group-averaged network definitions, commonly used in developmental functional connectivity research, limit our understanding of how network topography may change with age and can lead to inaccurate estimates of age effects on intra- and inter-network functional connectivity. Here, we collected a precision fMRI dataset from 24 parent-child pairs (children 6 to 8 years, 13 females; adults 33 to 47 years, 12 females) during passive video viewing and derived individual template-matched functional network maps from 60 minutes of motion-censored data per participant. Overall, large-scale network architecture was broadly shared between children and adults, with no age-effects observed for network-level surface area, few age differences in network boundaries and generally lower assignment confidence in children. Considering inter-individual similarity in network topography, association networks showed stronger within-family similarity and no overall effect of age on similarity of networks between pairs of individuals. We further asked how individualized network definitions might impact estimates of age effects on dense functional connectivity. While all approaches pointed to greater within-network functional connectivity in adults, we found that individualized approaches had larger age effects and lower sensitivity to head motion. Together, our results suggest that, relative to adults, pre-adolescent children show reduced network assignment confidence and weaker within-network connectivity, but limited differences in network borders and size, and underscore the value of individualized mapping for increasing sensitivity to age effects.

neuroscience↗

How much is 'enough'? Considerations for functional connectivity reliability in pediatric naturalistic fMRI

functional connectivity (FC) measurements are important for robust and reproducible findings, yet pediatric functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) faces unique challenges due to head motion and bias toward shorter scans. Passive viewing conditions during fMRI offer advantages for scanning pediatric populations, but FC reliability under these conditions remains underexplored. Here, we used precision fMRI data collected across three passive viewing conditions to directly compare FC reliability profiles between 25 pre-adolescent children and 25 adults, with each participant providing over 2.8 hours of data over four sessions. We found that FC test-retest correlations increased asymptotically with scan length, with children requiring nearly twice the post-censored scan time (24.6 minutes) compared to adults (14.4 minutes) to achieve comparable reliability, and that this effect was only partly attributable to head motion. Reliability differences between lower-motion adults and higher-motion children were spatially non-uniform and largest in ventral anterior temporal and frontal regions. While averaging features within functional networks improved intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reliability, values for higher-motion children remained in the poor-to-fair ICC range even with 48 minutes of total scan time. Viewing conditions with greater engagement reduced head motion in children but had lower FC reliability compared to less engaging low-demand videos, suggesting complex state- or condition-related trade-offs. These findings have important implications for developmental neuroimaging study design, particularly for higher motion pediatric populations.

neuroscience↗

Benchmarking common preprocessing strategies in early childhood functional connectivity MRI

Functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (FC-MRI) has been widely used to investigate neurodevelopment. However, FC-MRI is vulnerable to head motion, which is associated with age and distorts FC estimates. Numerous preprocessing strategies have been developed to mitigate confounds, each with advantages and drawbacks. Preprocessing strategies for FC-MRI have typically been validated and compared using resting state data from adults. However, FC-MRI in young children presents a unique challenge due to relatively high head motion and a growing use of passive viewing paradigms to mitigate motion. This highlights a need to compare processing choices in pediatric samples. To this end, we leveraged longitudinal, passive viewing fMRI data collected from 4 to 8-year-old children. We systematically investigated combinations of widely used and debated preprocessing strategies, namely global signal regression, volume censoring, ICA-AROMA, and bandpass filtering. We implemented commonly used metrics of noise removal (i.e. quality control-functional connectivity), metrics sensitive to individual differences (i.e. connectome fingerprinting), and, because data was collected during a passive viewing task, we also assessed the impact on stimulus-evoked responses (i.e. intersubject correlations; ISC). We found that the most efficacious pipeline included censoring, global signal regression, bandpass filtering, and head motion parameter regression. Despite the drawbacks of noise-mitigation steps, our findings show benefits for both noise removal and information retention in a high-motion early childhood sample. Highlights- We evaluated 27 preprocessing pipelines in passive viewing data from young children - Pipelines were evaluated on noise-removed and information retained - Pipelines that included censoring and GSR outperformed alternatives across benchmarks - For high-motion scans, preprocessing choices substantially alter connectomes

neuroscience↗