Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Tani, N.

Publications and source records attributed to Tani, N..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Proteomic analysis of RNA-dependent chromatin association of nuclear proteins

Various coding and non-coding transcripts are known to associate with chromatin and now there is accumulating evidence that interaction between RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) and RNA molecules regulate not only co-transcriptional mRNA processing, but also other biological processes within the nucleus. Although over a thousand of RBPs have been identified by several mass spectrometry-based methods, it is still unclear which of these RBPs actually associate with chromatin, especially through interaction with RNAs. In addition, biological outcomes of such RBP-RNA-chromatin interactions are yet to be elucidated.\n\nHere we describe a simple proteomics-based method for systematic screening of RBPs that are anchored to chromatin and/or insoluble nuclear substructures by RNA molecules. We used RNase A to release such RBPs from chromatin fraction and analyzed RNase A-solubilized proteins by mass spectrometry. Using this method, we were able to identify 156 RNase A-solubilized proteins of which 144 were known RBPs/RBP candidates. Interestingly, several key players of the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway were enriched in RNase A-solubilized fraction and the RNA-mediated chromatin association of these factors appeared to be dependent on transcriptional elongation. Furthermore, some enzymes involved in metabolic pathways were also released from chromatin and/or an insoluble nuclear structure by RNase A treatment. In summary, our methodology is highly versatile and is potentially a useful tool to unravel new biological functions for RBP-RNA-chromatin interactions.

molecular biology

High-quality SNPs from genic regions highlight introgression patterns among European white oaks (Quercus petraea and Q. robur).

The Src homology-2 domain containing phosphatase SHP2 is a critical regulator of signal transduction, being implicated in cell growth and differentiation. Activating mutations cause developmental disorders and act as oncogenic drivers in hematologic cancers. SHP2 is activated by phosphopeptide binding to the N-SH2 domain, triggering the release of N-SH2 from the catalytic PTP domain. Based on early crystallographic data, it has been widely accepted that opening of the binding cleft of N-SH2 serves as the key "allosteric switch" driving SHP2 activation. To test the putative coupling between binding cleft opening and SHP2 activation as assumed by the "allosteric switch" model, we critically reviewed structural data of SHP2 and we used extensive molecular dynamics (MD) simulation and free energy calculations of isolated N-SH2 in solution, SHP2 in solution, and SHP2 in a crystal environment. Our results demonstrate that the binding cleft in N-SH2 is constitutively flexible and open in solution, and that a closed cleft found in certain structures is a consequence of crystal contacts. The degree of opening of the binding cleft has only a negligible effect on the free energy of SHP2 activation. Instead, SHP2 activation is greatly favored by the opening of the central {beta}- sheet of N-SH2. We conclude that opening of the N-SH2 binding cleft is not the key allosteric switch triggering SHP2 activation. Significance StatementSHP2 is a multi-domain protein, playing an important role in up-regulating cellular processes such as cell survival, proliferation, and programmed cell death. SHP2 mutations cause developmental disorders and were found in many cancer types, including neuroblastoma, breast cancer, and leukemia. In healthy cells, SHP2 mainly takes an autoinhibited, inactive form, and SHP2 is activated upon binding of phosphopeptides to the N-SH2 domain. For the past two decades, the widening of the binding cleft upon peptide binding has been considered as the key event driving SHP2 activation. Here, by analyzing crystallographic data and molecular simulations, we demonstrate that the binding cleft in N-SH2 is, instead, already open and accessible in solution, and its degree of opening does not influence SHP2 activation.

evolutionary biology