Adversity severity shapes caregiving predictors and neural correlates of infant social behavior
Early-life adversity is associated with highly variable developmental outcomes, but identifying sources of this heterogeneity is difficult because variation in outcome is typically accompanied by variation in exposure. Animal models provide experimental leverage by standardizing features of the early environment while allowing variation in developmental experience and outcome to remain observable. Using a graded limited bedding and nesting model spanning normative rearing, moderate restriction, and severe scarcity, we asked what distinguishes social outcomes among animals exposed to the same resource restriction. Severe scarcity increased adverse maternal handling while leaving organized nurturing behaviors intact. Following the P8-P12 rearing manipulation, pups were tested outside the home cage in a P13 social approach assay. Severe scarcity reduced the proportion of pups that approached the dam, but outcomes varied substantially among scarcity litters. Greater typical maternal pup transport predicted greater approach, whereas a greater proportion of rough transport predicted poorer approach. Transport composition did not differ across rearing conditions, but its relationship with social behavior did. Amygdala intercalated-cell recruitment also covaried with social approach under severe scarcity despite limited condition-level differences in regional c-Fos. Plasma corticosterone differed across rearing conditions but did not covary detectably with the principal caregiving, behavioral, or neural measures. Maternal transport and intercalated-cell recruitment were not robustly associated, identifying separable experiential and neural correlates of behavioral variation. These findings show that standardizing an environmental constraint does not produce uniform developmental experience or outcome, and that caregiving experiences preserved across rearing conditions can distinguish social outcomes under severe scarcity.