Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Tallarico, G.

Publications and source records attributed to Tallarico, G..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Calibration standards and sensitivity limits for fluorescence measurements with the Chi.Bio open-source bioreactor platform

Automated platforms such as Chi.Bio enable simultaneous monitoring of optical density and fluorescent reporter expression in 20 ml reactor cultures with controllable pump systems. As such, they provide an appealing option for contemporary gene expression quantification, quantitative physiology, and laboratory evolution and ecology experiments. While optical density calibration for this device is well established, no equivalent calibration framework exists for fluorescence, making quantitative comparison with reference instruments unreliable. Here, we characterize Chi.Bio fluorescence capabilities using fluorescent calibration microspheres and fixed GFP-expressing S. cerevisiae and E. coli cells, compared with orthogonal plate-reader measurements. We show that microsphere fluorescence is detectable and scales linearly with concentration, whereas the GFP signal from both species falls below the device detection limit. Comparison of background-correction strategies indicates that direct subtraction of a non-fluorescent control measured within the same device yields more reliable fluorescence estimates than the commonly used on-line normalization method. Knowledge of these sensitivity boundaries of the device provides practical guidelines for experimental design of future studies.

systems biology↗

μSeq: Universal mutation rate quantification via deep sequencing of a single clonal expansion.

Understanding and quantifying mutational processes is fundamental for studying evolution in both clinical and experimental contexts. However, current methods are labor intensive and often lack robustness, particularly in mammalian cells. For example, current approaches that rely on subclonal mutations derived directly from patient samples often result in inconsistent or biased outcomes, leading to potentially unreliable conclusions on adaptive dynamics. We used patient-derived colorectal cancer organoids to introduce {micro}Seq, a universal framework for inferring mutation rates in diverse biological systems. Our approach extracts mutation rates from deep sequencing of single clonal expansions, with a time gain of ten-fold or more compared to a mutation accumulation line, at the cost of three billion read whole genome sequencing. {micro}Seq relies on four critical components: (i) a controlled experimental setup enabling validation (ii) a quantitative estimate inspired by the classic Luria-Delbruck spectrum for subclonal mutations derived from population dynamics, (iii) robust statistical models accounting for sampling noise and sequencing errors, and (iv) a data analysis pipeline for subclonal mutation detection that compares endpoint populations to a closely related ancestor. Building on the legacy of Luria and Delbruck, our model adopts core concepts from statistical physics--stochasticity, fluctuation spectra, and inference under noise--to construct a rigorous and scalable inference framework. We demonstrate that the Luria-Delbruck distribution extends to subclonal mutations in expanding populations, and show how this generalization enables robust estimation of the underlying mutation rate. Our models establish precise requirements for sequencing depth, genome size, and mutation frequency detection necessary for accurate mutation rate estimates. Crucially, we show that failing to meet these criteria can lead to errors spanning several orders of magnitude suggesting that biases in patients data arise from analyzing incorrect frequency intervals and from lack of a closely related reference. We validate our approach using parallel mutation accumulation experiments in colorectal cancer organoids, finding mutation rate estimates consistent with previous studies. However, we find that mutation accumulation lines operate under purifying selection in both yeast and human organoids, contradicting the long standing assumption of neutrality in such experiments. This insight has important implications for both evolutionary biology and cancer evolution. Finally, to demonstrate the adaptability of {micro}Seq, we apply it to yeast, leveraging multiple independent replicates to compensate for its much smaller genome, as well as in mouse xenografts, which feature much more complex in vivo population dynamics. The robustness and broad applicability of {micro}Seq establish it as a powerful and universal tool for mutation rate quantification, and imply that existing claims based on subclonal mutations from patient samples must be revisited. Short AbstractUnderstanding and quantifying mutational processes is fundamental to studying evolution in clinical and experimental contexts. However, current methods are labor intensive and often lack robustness, particularly in mammalian cells. For example, quantification of subclonal mutations directly from patient samples produces inconsistent estimates, leading to unreliable conclusions about adaptive dynamics. Using patient derived colorectal cancer organoids as a model system, we developed {micro}Seq, a novel framework to estimate mutation rates from deep sequencing of a single clonal expansion with a close reference. {micro}Seq builds on the Luria Delbruck model, combining statistical physics concepts with modern sequencing and inference techniques. It integrates (i) a controlled experimental setup, (ii) robust statistical and population dynamics models, and (iii) a data analysis pipeline for subclonal mutation detection. We establish precise requirements for sequencing depth, genome size, and mutation frequency to ensure accuracy despite sequencing errors. {micro}Seq enables accurate estimation of mutation rates as low as 10-9 mutations per base pair per generation, and we validate it across species using yeast data. Critically, {micro}Seq reveals that mutation accumulation lines undergo purifying selection in both human organoids and yeast, It underscores the need to reconsider claims based on subclonal mutations in patient samples.

evolutionary biology↗

Coupled ribosome allocation and nutrient sensing lead to incoherent feedback and oscillatory response in bacterial growth.

Current theories of bacterial growth physiology demonstrate impressive predictive power but are often phenomenological, lacking mechanistic detail. Incorporating such details would significantly enhance our ability to predict and control bacterial growth under varying environmental conditions. The "Flux Controlled Regulation" (FCR) model serves as a reference framework, linking ribosome allocation to translation efficiency through a steady-state assumption. However, it neglects ppGpp-mediated nutrient sensing and transcriptional regulation of ribosomal operons. Here, we propose a mechanistic model that extends the FCR framework by incorporating three key components: (i) the amino acid pool, (ii) ppGpp sensing of translation elongation rate, and (iii) transcriptional regulation of protein allocation by ppGpp-sensitive promoters. Our model aligns with observed steady-state growth laws and makes testable predictions for unobserved quantities. We show that during environmental changes, the incoherent feedback between sensing and regulation generates oscillatory relaxation dynamics, a behavior that we support by new and existing experimental data.

systems biology↗

Threshold accumulation of a constitutive protein explains E. coli cell division behavior in nutrient upshifts.

Despite of a boost of recent progress in dynamic single-cell measurements and analyses in E. coli, we still lack a mechanistic understanding of the determinants of the decision to divide. Specifically, the debate is open regarding the processes linking growth and chromosome replication to division, and on the molecular origin of the observed "adder correlations", whereby cells divide adding roughly a constant volume independent of their initial volume. In order to gain insight into these questions, we interrogate dynamic size-growth behavior of single cells across nutrient upshifts with a high-precision microfluidic device. We find that the division rate changes quickly after nutrients change, much before growth rate goes to a steady state, and in a way that adder correlations are robustly conserved. Comparison of these data to simple mathematical models falsifies proposed mechanisms where replication-segregation or septum completion are the limiting step for cell division. Instead, we show that the accumulation of a putative constitutively expressed "P-sector divisor" protein explains the behavior during the shift. Significance statementThe mechanism leading to cell division in the bacterium E. coli is unknown, but we know that it results in adding a roughly constant size every cell cycle, regardless of size at birth. While most available studies try to infer information on cell division from steadily dividing cells in constant nutrient conditions, this study leverages on a high-resolution device to monitor single-cell growth division upon nutrient changes. Comparing these data with different mathematical models, the authors are able to discriminate among fundamentally different mechanisms of cell division control, and they show that the data support a model where an unregulated protein accumulates to a threshold and triggers division.

cell biology↗