Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Tajik Mansouri, Z.

Publications and source records attributed to Tajik Mansouri, Z..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Parametric models for predicting nonstationary spike-spike correlations with local field potentials

ObjectiveCorrelations between the spiking of pairs of neurons are often used to study the brains representation of sensory or motor variables and neural circuit function and dysfunction. Previous statistical techniques have shown how time-averaged spike-spike correlations can be predicted by the time-averaged relationships between the individual neurons and the local field potential (LFP). However, spiking and LFP are both nonstationary, and spike-spike correlations have nonstationary structure that cannot be accounted for by time-averaged approaches. Here our goal is to develop parametric models that predict spike-spike correlations using a small number of LFP-based predictors and apply these models to the problem of tracking changes in spike-spike correlations over time. ApproachParametric models allow for flexibility in the choice of which LFP recording channels and frequency bands to use for prediction, and coefficients directly indicate which LFP features drive correlated spiking. Here we demonstrate our methods in simulation and test the models on experimental data from large-scale multi-electrode recordings in the mouse hippocampus and visual cortex. Main resultsIn single time windows, we find that our parametric models can be as accurate as previous nonparametric approaches, while also being flexible and interpretable. We then demonstrate how parametric models can be applied to describe nonstationary spike-spike correlations measured in sequential time windows. We find that although the patterns of both cortical and hippocampal spike-spike correlations vary over time, these changes are, at least partially, predicted by models that assume a fixed spike-field relationship. SignificanceThis approach may thus help to better understand how the dynamics of spike-spike correlations are related to functional brain states. Since spike-spike correlations are increasingly used as features for decoding external variables from neural activity, these models may also have the potential to improve the accuracy of adaptive decoders and brain machine interfaces.

neuroscience↗

Calibrating Bayesian decoders of neural spiking activity

Accurately decoding external variables from observations of neural activity is a major challenge in systems neuroscience. Bayesian decoders, that provide probabilistic estimates, are some of the most widely used. Here we show how, in many common settings, the probabilistic predictions made by traditional Bayesian decoders are overconfident. That is, the estimates for the decoded stimulus or movement variables are more certain than they should be. We then show how Bayesian decoding with latent variables, taking account of low-dimensional shared variability in the observations, can improve calibration, although additional correction for overconfidence is still needed. We examine: 1) decoding the direction of grating stimuli from spike recordings in primary visual cortex in monkeys, 2) decoding movement direction from recordings in primary motor cortex in monkeys, 3) decoding natural images from multi-region recordings in mice, and 4) decoding position from hippocampal recordings in rats. For each setting we characterize the overconfidence, and we describe a possible method to correct miscalibration post-hoc. Properly calibrated Bayesian decoders may alter theoretical results on probabilistic population coding and lead to brain machine interfaces that more accurately reflect confidence levels when identifying external variables. Significance StatementBayesian decoding is a statistical technique for making probabilistic predictions about external stimuli or movements based on recordings of neural activity. These predictions may be useful for robust brain machine interfaces or for understanding perceptual or behavioral confidence. However, the probabilities produced by these models do not always match the observed outcomes. Just as a weather forecast predicting a 50% chance of rain may not accurately correspond to an outcome of rain 50% of the time, Bayesian decoders of neural activity can be miscalibrated as well. Here we identify and measure miscalibration of Bayesian decoders for neural spiking activity in a range of experimental settings. We compare multiple statistical models and demonstrate how overconfidence can be corrected.

neuroscience↗