Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Sykes-Haas, H. S.

Publications and source records attributed to Sykes-Haas, H. S..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Minimally verbal children with autism may see the global, but point local: A behavioral and eye-tracking study in visual perceptual processing

Recent work suggests that pointing based assessments may underestimate or mischaracterize perceptual and cognitive abilities in minimally verbal autism (mvASD). Extending this line of work, we address the classic global local question by testing whether mvASD children access global visual structure and whether it is consistently expressed in behavior using Kanizsa illusory contours (KIC) and circular colinear contours (CC). Typically developing (TD) and mvASD children viewed KIC and CC stimuli on a touchscreen while spontaneous eye gaze and pointing were recorded. Participants also completed a goal directed drag and drop matching task that required selecting the solid shape corresponding to the global KIC configuration. In spontaneous responses, mvASD children were more drawn to local elements (e.g., individual inducers, the CC frame, single Gabors) and showed less centralized responding than TD peers. Notably, CC pointing was often anchored to one half of the contour regardless of contour screen location, suggesting object centered global selection. Also, in the drag and drop task, approx. 90% of mvASD participants performed above chance in at least one condition and half performed at ceiling, demonstrating accurate global matching. These findings suggest that global structure is available in mvASD but may be underweighted in spontaneous response selection under ambiguity, consistent with the Affordance Competition Hypothesis and ambiguity resolution accounts. Lay SummaryAutism research often asks whether autistic people can see the wood for the trees--integrate parts into a coherent whole. This is difficult to test in minimally verbal autism because many standard tasks rely on a single pointing response that may not reflect what a child actually perceives. In our study, children viewed visual illusions in which a clear shape seems to appear even though it is not actually drawn, for example, a triangle you see because several Pac Man shapes are arranged in just the right way, while we measured both where they looked and where they touched the screen. Minimally verbal autistic children were often more drawn to the smaller parts than typically developing peers, yet when a simple drag and drop game required an explicit choice of the overall shape, most selected the correct global shape. Together, the findings suggest that global structure can be available in mvASD, but its expression in spontaneous behavior may be more context dependent under uncertainty, highlighting the value of using more than one way to measure ability.

neuroscience↗

Hidden Literacy in Minimally Verbal Autistic Individuals Revealed by Eye Gaze

Minimally verbal autistic individuals (mvASD) are often presumed to have severe cognitive and language impairments based on their poor performance on standardized assessments requiring voluntary motor responses, such as pointing. However, emerging evidence suggests that these individuals may possess latent cognitive abilities. Here, we introduce the Cued Looking Paradigm (CLP), a novel eye-tracking method that bypasses motor requirements by capturing automatic gaze responses to language-based stimuli. In our study, 35 minimally verbal autistic adolescents and adults were presented with spoken or written words, followed by a pair of images (target and foil) as their eye movements were recorded. Among mvASD participants with usable eye-tracking data (n = 30), the majority (80%) demonstrated hidden receptive language and reading abilities, as evidenced by eye-gaze measures, including temporal dynamics and spatial displacement, that were comparable to those observed in neurotypical controls. In contrast, the same mvASD individuals averaged only 57% accuracy when asked to read and point to the target picture, revealing a significant gap between reporting via pointing and actual lexical-semantic knowledge. Furthermore, pupil dilation analysis during tasks indicated reduced arousal recruitment in mvASD participants, potentially implicating dysregulation of the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine (LC-NE) system associated with the performance gap between pointing and eye-gaze. These findings challenge assumptions of global intellectual limitation while confirming specific lexical-semantic competence among mvASD individuals. Results highlight the need for, and provide, alternative- assessments that bypass manual motor responses. The CLP shows promise for revealing cognitive and language abilities, with important implications for both research and education. Significance StatementStandard language tests implicitly assume that a person can point or speak. Although minimally verbal individuals can point, this response may not reliably reflect comprehension. Using a simple eye-tracking task that replaces pointing with automatic gaze shifts, we show that most mvASD participants accurately match spoken or written words to pictures--even though they fail the same task when pointing is required. This finding challenges the assumption that absence of speech is typically associated with absence of understanding and reveals bias in common assessments. Tools that bypass manual motor demands by using eye movements, such as the Cued Looking Paradigm, together with changes in assessment and intervention, could transform diagnosis, guide education, and open new research avenues on covert language processing.

neuroscience↗

Minimally verbal children with autism may see the point, but do not (always) point to what they see:A behavioral and eye-tracking study in visual perceptual processing

During typical development, non-social visual object recognition emerges in the first year of life, engaging low-level visual cues and higher-level mechanisms involving inference and prior knowledge. How these processes function in minimally verbal autism (mvASD) remains poorly understood. We studied children with mvASD (n=22, 6-11 years) using touchscreen-based oddball and contour-detection tasks targeting low-level stimuli (e.g. shape and orientation), and mid-level stimuli (e.g. illusory Kanizsa contours and 3D shapes). Pointing and eye-gaze responses were measured. Typically developing children (n=22, 6-12 years) served as a reference group. Accuracy and reaction-time profiles among mvASD participants were heterogeneous across experimental visual tasks and standardized developmental measures. All mvASD participants detected targets in the easiest condition, and approximately half succeeded across low-level tasks. Overall performance declined with increasing visual complexity, consistent with attenuated inference-based processing; communication ability and nonverbal reasoning together accounted for approximately 69% of between-participant variance in visual task performance. Critically, exploratory analyses suggested systematic perception-action dissociations rather than random error. First, the majority of participants who failed to point correctly (n=9) reliably fixated the correct target. Second, in the Kanizsa oddball task, nearly half of successful mvASD participants pointed to local inducers rather than the illusory figure center, unlike TDs. Third, more participants showed within-age-range nonverbal reasoning performance on Ravens colorful progressive matrices when responding by puzzle placement than by pointing. These converging findings challenge interpretations of mvASD performance as reflecting perceptual or cognitive capacity alone, suggesting visual signals may guide action selection differently in mvASD. Lay SummaryMinimally verbal children with autism showed individual differences in visual processing tasks. While developmental measures like communication ability and reasoning skills predicted most of the variation in performance, exploratory observations revealed an intriguing pattern: the same children sometimes succeeded when using their eyes to indicate answers but failed when pointing or performing better when placing puzzle pieces than pointing in a booklet to identical visual display. Several children who correctly detected illusory triangular shapes consistently touched the corner pieces rather than the triangle centers. These patterns suggest that performance depends not only on developmental and visual perceptual abilities, but also on how children are asked to respond. Parents and educators should consider: might a child who fails a pointing-based test succeed with a different response method?

neuroscience↗