Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Sweis, B. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Sweis, B. M..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Chronic social stress induces isolated deficits in reward anticipation on a neuroeconomic foraging task

Measuring reward anticipation distinct from other aspects of reward value, including costs required to obtain a reward or the intrinsic hedonic value of consuming the reward itself, can be difficult to disentangle. Here, we show that mice trained on a self-paced neuroeconomic foraging task convey reward anticipation via differentially invigorated travel times between uniquely flavored feeding sites separate from willingness to wait, consummatory behaviors, or place preferences measured within the same trial. Following exposure to chronic social defeat stress, we found that only stress-susceptible but not stress-resilient mice revealed deficits in this metric after consuming but not after rejecting a reward on the previous trial, indicating that blunted anticipation in these animals is state-dependent, or punctuated by recent reward receipt. After increasing economic pressure and task demands, locomotion was globally invigorated and, in turn, masked stress-related deficits in reward anticipation. These findings suggest that the ability to detect changes in specific aspects of motivational deficits associated with depression and other stress-related disorders depends on an interaction between the state of an individual and environmental circumstances.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Region-specific CREB function regulates distinct forms of regret associated with resilience versus susceptibility to chronic stress

Regret describes recognizing that alternative actions could have led to better outcomes. This can transform into behavioral consequences, altering subsequent valuations, but remains unclear if regret derives from a generalized computation for mistake appraisal or instead is made up of dissociable action-specific processes. Using a novel neuroeconomic decision-making paradigm, we found mice were differentially sensitive to fundamentally distinct types of missed opportunities following exposure to chronic social defeat stress or manipulations of CREB, a key transcription factor implicated in chronic stress action. Bias to make compensatory decisions after rejecting high-value offers (regret type I) was unique to stress-susceptible mice. Bias following the converse operation, accepting low-value offers (regret type II), was enhanced in stress-resilient and absent in stress-susceptible mice. CREB function in either the medial prefrontal cortex or nucleus accumbens was required to suppress regret type I but differentially affected regret type II. We provide insight into how adaptive versus maladaptive stress-response traits may be related to fundamentally distinct forms of counterfactual thinking and could steer psychotherapy for mood disorders such as depression toward unveiling circuit-specific computations through a careful description of decision narrative.

neuroscience↗

Sunk cost sensitivity in mice, rats, and humans on the Restaurant Row and WebSurf tasks cannot be explained by attrition biases alone

In a recent bioRxiv preprint, Ott et al. argue that sensitivities to sunk costs that have been reported in two serial foraging tasks (the Restaurant Row task in mice and rats, and the Web-Surf task in humans) may be due to simple consequences of the way that subjects perform these tasks and not due to an actual sensitivity to sunk costs. However, several variants of these tasks have been studied, in which the sensitivity to sunk costs changes. In order to test the Ott et al. model against these experimental observations, we simulated the model under these additional experimental conditions. We find that it is incompatible with the actual data. While we applaud the simplicity of the Ott et al. model, we must reject it as an explanation for the observed sensitivity to sunk costs seen in these tasks. We thus conclude that the alternative explanation - that mice, rats, and humans are sensitive to actual sunk costs in these tasks - is a better explanation for the data.

neuroscience↗