Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Swanson, K. R.

Publications and source records attributed to Swanson, K. R..

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Virtual Clinical Trials of BMP4 Differentiation Therapy: Digital Twins to Aid Glioblastoma Trial Design

Glioma stem cells (GSCs) are considered a major driver of glioblastoma (GBM) progression and are highly resistant to standard cytotoxic treatments. BMP4 has been shown to drive differentiation of GSCs, increase sensitivity to radiotherapy, slow growth and increase survival times in animal models. To assess the potential of BMP4 as a differentiation therapy, we develop a mathematical model that describes the growth of a GBM tumor via a hierarchy of GSCs, progenitor cells and terminally differentiated cells. We parametrize our model using experimental data from twelve patient-derived GSC lines, on which we measured response to radiotherapy and population growth with and without exposure to BMP4. Cell lines were typically more sensitive to radiotherapy after two days of BMP4 treatment but population growth can either increase or decrease after seven days of exposure to BMP4. To identify key parameters that drive successful treatment we perform global sensitivity analysis which identifies key parameters for BMP4 efficacy including proliferation rate and self-renewal sensitivity of GSCs. We then compare two treatment schedules: a single dose of BMP4 at resection and continuous delivery of BMP4 from resection till the end of radiotherapy. Due to the short half-life of BMP4 and its synergy with radiotherapy, continuous delivery of BMP4 during radiotherapy is more effective than a single dose prior to radiotherapy. We then perform a series of virtual clinical trials, stratified by tumor proliferation rate and GSC self-renewal sensitivity, which allows us to estimate the probability of observing a successful early-phase clinical trial for various virtual patient cohorts. We find that trials that selected the subset of patients with more proliferative GBMs were more likely to lead to significant improvements in survival. SignificanceTargeting glioma stem cells with BMP4 provides a novel opportunity to shift the complex cellular ecosystem of gliomas to enhance treatment efficacy. Mathematical modelling can facilitate optimal patient tumor feature selection when designing successful clinical trials.

cancer biology↗

Glioblastoma states are defined by cohabitating cellular populations with progression-, imaging- and sex-distinct patterns

Background: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the mainstay for neurosurgical oncology but not for informing us about glioma biology. An obstacle to developing MR-based glioma biomarkers is the absence of rigorous correlation between MRI features and glioma biology as assessed in multi-regional biopsies, within and across patients. Methods: We directly addressed this obstacle by collating a unique cohort of 202 MRI-localized biopsies from 58 patients. We define a low-dimensional transcriptional pseudotime continuum along which heterogeneous high-grade glioma (HGG) samples organize both within and across patients. Results: We observe three polarized transcriptional tissue states: infiltrated brain, immune/inflammatory, and proliferative associated with patterns of cohabitation of cellular subpopulations. The states and deconvolved populations show correlation with enhancement status on T1Gd MRI. Moreover, discrete MRI habitats, regions sharing common imaging features, defined as combinations of high or low signal intensity across multiparametric MRI revealed 14 MRI habitats. We order the MRI habitats according to the average pseudotime on the transcriptional continuum. We find that MRI habitats with low pseudotime (associated with early tumor development and diffusely invaded brain tissue) localized at the periphery of the tumor whilst high pseudotime either proliferative or immune/inflammatory states were towards the core of the lesion. We find that composition of MRI habitats is impacted by MGMT status. Conclusion: This suggests that ongoing aggregation of MRI-localized biopsies may augment our projection of biology onto MRI habitats to support the noninvasive identification of cellular ecologies within and across each patient's tumor.

cancer biology↗

Complementary role of mathematical modeling in preclinical glioblastoma: differentiating poor drug delivery from drug insensitivity

Glioblastoma is the most malignant primary brain tumor with significant heterogeneity and a limited number of effective therapeutic options. Many investigational targeted therapies have failed in clinical trials, but it remains unclear if this results from insensitivity to therapy or poor drug delivery across the blood-brain barrier. Using well-established EGFR-amplified patient-derived xenograft (PDX) cell lines, we investigated this question using an EGFR-directed therapy. With only bioluminescence imaging, we used a mathematical model to quantify the heterogeneous treatment response across the three PDX lines (GBM6, GBM12, GBM39). Our model estimated the primary cause of intracranial treatment response for each of the lines, and these findings were validated with parallel experimental efforts. This mathematical modeling approach can be used as a useful complementary tool that can be widely applied to many more PDX lines. This has the potential to further inform experimental efforts and reduce the cost and time necessary to make experimental conclusions. Author summaryGlioblastoma is a deadly brain cancer that is difficult to treat. New therapies often fail to surpass the current standard of care during clinical trials. This can be attributed to both the vast heterogeneity of the disease and the blood-brain barrier, which may or may not be disrupted in various regions of tumors. Thus, while some cancer cells may develop insensitivity in the presence of a drug due to heterogeneity, other tumor areas are simply not exposed to the drug. Being able to understand to what extent each of these is driving clinical trial results in individuals may be key to advancing novel therapies. To address this challenge, we used mathematical modeling to study the differences between three patient-derived tumors in mice. With our unique approach, we identified the reason for treatment failure in each patient tumor. These results were validated through rigorous and time-consuming experiments, but our mathematical modeling approach allows for a cheaper, quicker, and widely applicable way to come to similar conclusions.

cancer biology↗

Morphological Metrics of Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Glioblastoma as Biomarkers of Prognosis

Morphological characteristics have been linked to outcomes across a variety of cancers. Lacunarity is a quantitative morphological measure of how shapes fill space while fractal dimension is a morphological measure of the complexity of pixel arrangement. Glioblastoma is the most aggressive primary brain tumor with a short expected survival given the current standard-of-care treatment. Due to the sensitive location of the tumor, there is a heavy reliance on imaging to assess the state of the disease in the clinic. In this project, we computed lacunarity and fractal dimension values for glioblastoma-induced abnormalities on gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (T1Gd MRI) as well as T2-weighted (T2) and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRIs. In our patient cohort (n=402), we aim to connect these morphological metrics calculated on pretreatment MRI with the survival of patients with GBM. We calculated lacunarity and fractal dimension across all MRI slices on necrotic regions (n=390) and abnormalities on T1Gd MRI (n=402), as well as on enhancing abnormalities present on T2/FLAIR MRI (n=257). We also explored the relationship between these metrics and age at diagnosis, as well as abnormality volume. We found statistically significant relationships to outcome across all three imaging subtypes, with the shape of T2/FLAIR abnormalities showing the strongest relationship with overall survival. The link between morphological and survival metrics could be driven by underlying biological phenomena, tumor location or microenvironmental factors that should be further explored.

bioinformatics↗

Sex Differences in MRI-Based Metrics of Glioma Invasion and Brain Mechanics

Gliomas are brain tumors characterized by highly variable growth patterns. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the cornerstone of glioma diagnosis and management planning. However, glioma features on MRI do not directly correlate with tumor cell distribution. Additionally, there is evidence that glioma tumor characteristics and prognosis are sex-dependent. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is an imaging technique that allows interrogation of tissue stiffness in-vivo and has found utility in the imaging of several cancers. We investigate the relationship between MRI features, MRE features, and growth parameters derived from an established mathematical model of glioma proliferation and invasion. Results suggest that both the relationship between tumor volume and tumor stiffness as well as the relationship between the parameters derived from the mathematical model and tumor stiffness are sex-dependent. These findings lend evidence to a growing body of knowledge about the clinical importance of sex in the context of cancer diagnosis, prognosis and treatment.

biophysics↗

Identifying the spatial and temporal dynamics of molecularly-distinct glioblastoma sub-populations

Glioblastomas (GBMs) are the most aggressive primary brain tumours and have no known cure. Each individual tumour comprises multiple sub-populations of genetically-distinct cells that may respond differently to targeted therapies and may contribute to disappointing clinical trial results. Image-localized biopsy techniques allow multiple biopsies to be taken during surgery and provide information that identifies regions where particular sub-populations occur within an individual GBM, thus providing insight into their regional genetic variability. These sub-populations may also interact with one another through a competitive or cooperative nature; it is important to ascertain the nature of these interactions, as they may have implications for responses to targeted therapies. We combine genetic information from biopsies with a mechanistic model of interacting GBM sub-populations to characterise the nature of interactions between two commonly occurring GBM sub-populations, those with EGFR and PDGFRA genes amplified. We study population levels found across image-localized biopsy data from a cohort of 25 patients and compare this to model outputs under competitive, cooperative and neutral interaction assumptions. We explore other factors affecting the observed simulated sub-populations, such as selection advantages and phylogenetic ordering of mutations, which may also contribute to the levels of EGFR and PDGFRA amplified populations observed in biopsy data.

cancer biology↗

A Mechanistic Investigation into Ischemia-Driven Distal Recurrence of Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor with a short median survival. Tumor recurrence is a clinical expectation of this disease and usually occurs along the resection cavity wall. However, previous clinical observations have suggested that in cases of ischemia following surgery, tumors are more likely to recur distally. Through the use of a previously established mechanistic model of GBM, the Proliferation Invasion Hypoxia Necrosis Angiogenesis (PIHNA) model, we explore the phenotypic drivers of this observed behavior. We have extended the PIHNA model to include a new nutrient-based vascular efficiency term that encodes the ability of local vasculature to provide nutrients to the simulated tumor. The extended model suggests sensitivity to a hypoxic microenvironment and the inherent migration and proliferation rates of the tumor cells are key factors that drive distal recurrence.

cancer biology↗

Investigating the Role of Hypoxia-Induced Migration in Glioblastoma Growth Rates

We analyze the wave-speed of the Proliferation Invasion Hypoxia Necrosis Angiogenesis (PIHNA) model that was previously created and applied to simulate the growth and spread of glioblastoma (GBM), a particularly aggressive primary brain tumor. We extend the PIHNA model by allowing for different hypoxic and normoxic cell migration rates and study the impact of these differences on the wave-speed dynamics. Through this analysis, we find key variables that drive the outward growth of the simulated GBM. We find a minimum tumor wave-speed for the model; this depends on the migration and proliferation rates of the normoxic cells and is achieved under certain conditions on the migration rates of the normoxic and hypoxic cells. If the hypoxic cell migration rate is greater than the normoxic cell migration rate above a threshold, the wave-speed increases above the predicted minimum. This increase in wave-speed is explored through an eigenvalue and eigenvector analysis of the linearized PIHNA model, which yields an expression for this threshold. The PIHNA model suggests that an inherently faster-diffusing hypoxic cell population can drive the outward growth of a GBM as a whole, and that this effect is more prominent for faster proliferating tumors that recover relatively slowly from a hypoxic phenotype.

cancer biology↗

Quantifying glioblastoma drug response dynamics incorporating resistance and blood brain barrier penetrance from experimental data

Many drugs investigated for the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM) have had poor clinical outcomes, as their efficacy is dependent on adequate delivery to sensitive tumor cell populations, which is limited by the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Further complicating evaluation of therapeutic efficacy, tumors can become resistant to anti-cancer drugs, and it can be difficult to gauge the extent to which BBB limitations and resistance each contribute to a drugs failure. To address this question, we developed a minimal mathematical model to characterize these elements of overall drug response, informed by time-series bioluminescence imaging data from a treated patient-derived xenograft (PDX) experimental model. By fitting this mathematical model to a preliminary dataset in a series of nonlinear regression steps, we estimated parameter values for individual PDX subjects that correspond to the dynamics seen in experimental data. Using these estimates, we performed a parameter sensitivity analysis using Latin hypercube sampling and partial rank correlation coefficients. Results from this analysis combined with simulation results suggest that BBB permeability may play a slightly larger role in therapeutic efficacy than drug resistance. Our model and fitting technique to estimate parameters from data may be a useful tool in aiding further exploration of these challenges in future studies of drug efficacy with larger datasets.

cancer biology↗

Days Gained Response Discriminates Treatment Response in Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma Receiving Bevacizumab-based Therapies

PurposeAccurate assessments of patient response to therapy are a critical component of personalized medicine. In glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the most aggressive form of brain cancer, tumor growth dynamics are heterogenous across patients, complicating assessment of treatment response. This study aimed to analyze Days Gained (DG), a burgeoning model-based dynamic metric, for response assessment in patients with recurrent GBM who received bevacizumab-based therapies.\n\nExperimental DesignDays Gained response scores were calculated using volumetric tumor segmentations for patients receiving bevacizumab with and without concurrent cytotoxic therapy (N=62). Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses were implemented to examine DG prognostic relationship to overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from the onset of treatment for recurrent GBM.\n\nResultsIn patients receiving concurrent bevacizumab and cytotoxic therapy, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significant differences in OS and PFS at previously identified DG cutoffs consistent with previous DG analyses using gadolinium-enhanced T1 weighted MR imaging. DG scores for bevacizumab monotherapy only approached significance for PFS. Cox regression showed that increases of 25 DG were significantly associated with a 12.5% reduction in OS hazard for concurrent therapy patients and a 4.4% reduction in PFS hazard for bevacizumab monotherapy.\n\nConclusionDays Gained has significant meaning in recurrent therapy as a metric of treatment response, even in the context of anti-angiogenic therapies. This provides further evidence supporting the use of DG as an adjunct response metric that quantitatively connects treatment response and clinical outcomes.

cancer biology↗

Sex differences in seizure at presentation in glioma population

Seizures are common presenting symptoms of primary brain tumors. Mechanisms of epileptogenesis are still unknown and are believed to be multifactorial. Previous studies have indicated correlation of seizure with tumor location. Recent investigations of our group have shown image-based parameters have sex-specific implications for patient outcome. In this retrospective study, we examined the association of tumor location with the probability and risk of seizure in male and female glioma patients.

cancer biology↗

Sex Differences in Predictors of Seizure in Contrast-Enhancing Gliomas at Clinical Presentation: A Network Approach

BackgroundBrain tumor related epilepsy (BTE) is a major co-morbidity related to the management of patients with brain cancer. Despite published practice guidelines recommending against anti-epileptic drug (AED) utilization in patients with gliomas, there is heterogeneity in prescription practices of AEDs in these patients. In an attempt to impact BTE management, we statistically analyzed clinically relevant attributes (sex, age, tumor size, tumor growth kinetics, and tumor location) pertaining to seizure at presentation and used them to build a computational machine learning model to predict the probability of a seizure (at presentation).\n\nMethodsFrom our clinical data repository, we identified 223 patients (females, n=86; males, n=137) with pathologically-determined glioma and known seizure status at clinical presentation. Non-parametric and Fishers Exact tests were used to identify statistical differences in clinical characteristics. We utilized a random forest machine learning method for generating our predictive models by entire cohort and separated by male and female.\n\nFindingsPatients were divided into those that presented with seizure (SP, n=96, 43%; F, n= 28; M, n= 68) and those that presented without seizure (nSP, n=127, 57%, F n=58, M n=69). Females presented with seizures significantly less often than males (x2=6{middle dot}28, p=0{middle dot}01). SP patients had significantly smaller T1Gd radius compared to nSP (SP 11{middle dot}30mm, nSP 18.66mm, p<0{middle dot}0001). Tumor size and patient age were significant negative predictors for SP; patients with larger tumors, older age and less tumor diffusivity (p/D) were at lower risk for SP.\n\nInterpretationDespite heterogeneity across our patient cohort, there is strong evidence of a role for patient sex, tumor size, tumor invasion, and patient age in predicting the incidence of seizures at diagnosis. Future studies, with prospectively detailed data collection, may provide clearer insights into the incidence of seizures through a patients treatment course.

cancer biology↗

Modeling the Role of Hypoxia in Glioblastoma Growth and Recurrence Patterns

A typical feature of glioblastoma (GBM) growth is local recurrence after surgery. However, some GBMs recur distally. It has been noted that GBM patients with perioperative ischemia are more likely to have distal recurrence and that GBM cells migrate faster under hypoxic conditions. We apply the Proliferation Invasion Hypoxia Necrosis Angiogenesis (PIHNA) model to examine the effect of faster hypoxic cell migration on simulated GBM growth. Results suggest that a highly migratory hypoxic cell population drives the growth of the whole tumor and leads to distant recurrence, as do higher normoxic tumor cell migration and low cellular proliferation rates.

cancer biology↗

From cells to tissue: How cell scale heterogeneity impacts glioblastoma growth and treatment response

Glioblastomas are aggressive primary brain tumors known for their inter- and intratumor heterogeneity. This disease is uniformly fatal, with intratumor heterogeneity the major reason for treatment failure and recurrence. Just like the nature vs nurture debate, heterogeneity can arise from heritable or environmental influences. Whilst it is impossible to clinically separate observed behavior of cells from their environmental context, using a mathematical framework combined with multiscale data gives us insight into the relative roles of variation from inherited and environmental sources.\n\nTo better understand the implications of intratumor heterogeneity on therapeutic outcomes, we created a hybrid agent-based mathematical model that captures both the overall tumor kinetics and the individual cellular behavior. We track single cells as agents, cell density on a coarser scale, and growth factor diffusion and dynamics on a finer scale over time and space. Our model parameters were fit utilizing serial MRI imaging and cell tracking data from ex vivo tissue slices acquired from a growth-factor driven glioblastoma murine model.\n\nWhen fitting our model to serial imaging only, there was a spectrum of equally-good parameter fits corresponding to a wide range of phenotypic behaviors. This wide spectrum of in silico tumors also had a wide variety of responses to an application of an antiproliferative treatment. Recurrent tumors were generally less proliferative than pre-treatment tumors as measured via the model simulations and validated from human GBM patient histology. When fitting our model using imaging and cell scale data, we determined that heritable heterogeneity is required to capture the observed migration behavior. Further, we found that all tumors increased in size after an anti-migratory treatment, and some tumors were larger after a combination treatment than with an anti-proliferative treatment alone. Together our results emphasize the need to understand the underlying phenotypes and tumor heterogeneity in designing therapeutic regimens.

cancer biology↗

Quantifying glioblastoma drug penetrance from experimental data

Poor clinical trial outcomes for glioblastoma (GBM) can be attributed to multiple possible causes. GBM is heterogeneous, such that there is a chance of treatment-resistant cells coming to predominate the tumor, and due to the blood brain barrier (BBB) it is also possible that therapy was inadequately delivered to the tumor. Mathematically modeling the dynamics of therapeutic response in patient-derived xenografts (PDX) and fitting the mathematical model to bioluminescence imaging flux data, we may be able to assess the degree to which both drug resistance and drug penetrance are driving varied responses to these therapies.

cancer biology↗

Image-based metric of invasiveness predicts response to adjuvant temozolomide for primary glioblastoma

Temozolomide (TMZ) has been the standard-of-care chemotherapy for glioblastoma (GBM) patients for more than a decade. Despite this long time in use, significant questions remain regarding how best to optimize TMZ therapy for individual patients. Understanding the relationship between TMZ response and factors such as number of adjuvant TMZ cycles, patient age, patient sex, and image-based tumor features, might help predict which GBM patients would benefit most from TMZ, particularly for those whose tumors are not MGMT methylated. Using a cohort of 90 newly-diagnosed GBM patients treated according to the Stupp protocol, we examined the relationships between several patient and tumor characteristics and volumetric and survival outcomes during adjuvant chemotherapy. Volumetric changes in MR imaging abnormalities during adjuvant therapy were used to assess TMZ response. T1Gd volumetric response is associated with younger patient age, increased number of TMZ cycles, longer time to nadir volume, and decreased tumor invasiveness. Moreover, increased adjuvant TMZ cycles corresponded with improved volumetric response only among more nodular tumors, and this volumetric response was associated with improved survival outcomes. Finally, in a subcohort of patients with known MGMT methylation status, MGMT methylated tumors were more diffusely invasive than unmethylated tumors, suggesting that the improved response in nodular tumors is not driven by a preponderance of MGMT methylated tumors. Our finding that less diffusely invasive tumors are associated with greater volumetric response to TMZ suggests that patients with these tumors may benefit from additional cycles of adjuvant TMZ, even for those without MGMT methylation.

cell biology↗

ENvironmental Dynamics Underlying Responsive Extreme Survivors (ENDURES) of Glioblastoma: a Multi-disciplinary Team-based, Multifactorial Analytical Approach

Although glioblastoma is a fatal primary brain cancer with a short median survival of 15 months, a small number of patients survive more than 5 years after diagnosis; they are known as extreme survivors (ES). Due to their rarity, very little is known about what differentiates these outliers from other glioblastoma patients. For the purpose of identifying unknown drivers of extreme survivorship in glioblastoma, we developed the ENDURES consortium (ENvironmental Dynamics Underlying Responsive Extreme Survivors of glioblastoma). This consortium is a multicenter collaborative network of investigators focused on the integration of multiple types of clinical data and the creation of patient-specific models of tumor growth informed by radiographic and histological parameters. Leveraging our combined resources, the goals of the ENDURES consortium are two-fold: (1) to build a curated, searchable, multilayered repository housing clinical and outcome data on a large cohort of ES patients with glioblastoma and (2) to leverage the ENDURES repository for new insights on tumor behavior and novel targets for prolonging survival for all glioblastoma patients. In this article, we review the available literature and discuss what is already known about ES. We then describe the creation of our consortium and some of our preliminary results.\n\nFundingThis review was financially supported by a grant from the James S. McDonnell Foundation\n\nConflicts of InterestThe authors have declared that no conflicts of interest exist.\n\nAuthorshipConceptualized consortium: LW, RG, KME, PC, and KRS. Built consortium: SKJ, PK, NR, JS, KME, PC, and KRS. Wrote the manuscript: SKJ, PW, SCM, PK, AP, and KME. Reviewed and edited the manuscript: LFGC, MMM, AHD, PRJ, and LSH. Contributed to writing, provided feedback, and approved of final manuscript: All authors.\n\nLink to website for ENDUREShttp://mathematicalneurooncology.org/?page_id=2125

cancer biology↗

Connecting Patterns of Tumor Growth with Sex Differences in Extreme Survivorship for Primary Glioblastoma Patients

BackgroundSex is recognized as a significant determinant of outcome among glioblastoma patients, but the relative prognostic importance of glioblastoma features has not been thoroughly explored for sex differences.\n\nMethodsCombining multi-modal MR images, biomathematical models, and patient clinical information, this investigation assesses which pretreatment variables have a sex-specific impact on the survival of glioblastoma patients. Pretreatment MR images of 494 glioblastoma patients (299 males and 195 females) were segmented to quantify tumor volumes. Cox proportional hazard (CPH) models and Students t-tests were used to assess which variables were associated with survival outcomes.\n\nResultsAmong males, tumor (T1Gd) radius was a predictor of overall survival (HR=1.027, p=0.044). Among females, higher tumor cell net invasion rate was a significant detriment to overall survival (HR=1.011, p<0.001). Female extreme survivors had significantly smaller tumors (T1Gd) (p=0.010 t-test), but tumor size was not correlated with female overall survival (p=0.955 CPH). Both male and female extreme survivors had significantly lower tumor cell net proliferation rates than other patients (M p=0.004, F p=0.001, t-test). Additionally, extent of resection, tumor laterality, and IDH1 mutation status were also found to have sex-specific effects on overall survival.\n\nConclusionDespite similar distributions of the MR imaging parameters between males and females, there was a sex-specific difference in how these parameters related to outcomes, which emphasizes the importance of considering sex as a biological factor when determining patient prognosis and treatment approach.

cancer biology↗