Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Sutter, M. L.

Publications and source records attributed to Sutter, M. L..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Hierarchical emergence of opponent coding in auditory belt cortex

We recorded from neurons in primary auditory cortex (A1) and middle-lateral belt area (ML) while rhesus macaques either discriminated amplitude-modulated noise (AM) from unmodulated noise or passively heard the same stimuli. We used several post-hoc pooling models to investigate the ability of auditory cortex to leverage population coding for AM detection. We find that pooled-response AM detection is better in the active condition than the passive condition, and better using rate-based coding than synchrony-based coding. Neurons can be segregated into two classes based on whether they increase (INC) or decrease (DEC) their firing rate in response to increasing modulation depth. In these samples, A1 had relatively fewer DEC neurons (26%) than ML (45%). When responses were pooled without segregating these classes, AM detection using rate-based coding was much better in A1 than in ML, but when pooling only INC neurons, AM detection in ML approached that found in A1. Pooling only DEC neurons resulted in impaired AM detection in both areas. To investigate the role of DEC neurons, we devised two pooling methods that opposed DEC and INC neurons - a direct subtractive method and a two-pool push-pull opponent method. Only the push-pull opponent method resulted in superior AM detection relative to indiscriminate pooling. In the active condition, the opponent method was superior to pooling only INC neurons during the late portion of the response in ML. These results suggest that the increasing prevalence of the DEC response type in ML can be leveraged by appropriate methods to improve AM detection.

neuroscience↗

Neural correlates of auditory pattern learning in the auditory cortex

Learning of new auditory stimuli requires repetitive exposure to the stimulus. Fast and implicit learning of sounds presented at random times enables efficient auditory perception. However, it is unclear how such sensory encoding is processed on a neural level. We investigated neural responses that are developed from a passive, repetitive exposure to a specific sound in the auditory cortex of anesthetized rats, using electrocorticography. We presented a series of random sequences that are generated afresh each time, except for a specific reference sequence that remains constant and re-appears at random times across trials. We compared induced activity amplitudes between reference and fresh sequences. Neural responses from both primary and non-primary auditory cortical regions showed significantly decreased induced activity amplitudes for reference sequences compared to fresh sequences, especially in the beta band. This is the first study showing that neural correlates of auditory pattern learning can be evoked even in anesthetized, passive listening animal models.

neuroscience↗

Hierarchical effects of choice related activity and neural encoding during feature selective attention

Selective attention is necessary to sift through, form a coherent percept of, and make behavioral decisions on the vast amount of information present in most sensory environments. How and where selective attention is employed in cortex and how this perceptual information then informs the relevant behavioral decisions is still not well understood. Studies probing selective attention and decision making in visual cortex have been enlightening as to how sensory attention might work in that modality; whether or not similar mechanisms are employed in auditory attention is not yet clear. Therefore, we trained rhesus macaques on a feature selective attention task, where they switched between reporting changes in temporal (amplitude modulation, AM) and spectral (carrier bandwidth) features of a broadband noise stimulus. We investigated how the encoding of these features by single neurons in primary (A1) and secondary (lateral belt, ML) auditory cortex were affected by the different attention conditions. We found that neurons in A1 and ML showed mixed-selectivity to the sound and task features. We found no difference in AM encoding between the attention conditions. We found that choice-related activity in both A1 and ML neurons shifts between attentional conditions. This finding suggests that choice-related activity in auditory cortex does not simply reflect motor preparation or action, and supports the relationship between reported choice-related activity and the decision and perceptual process. New & NoteworthyWe recorded from primary and secondary auditory cortex while monkeys performed a non-spatial feature attention task. Both areas exhibited rate-based choice-related activity. The manifestation of choice-related activity was attention-dependent, suggesting that choice-related activity in auditory cortex does not simply reflect arousal or motor influences, but relates to the specific perceptual choice. The lack of temporal-based choice activity is consistent with growing evidence that subcortical, but not cortical, single neurons inform decisions through temporal envelope following.

neuroscience↗

An emergent population code in primary auditory cortex supports selective attention to spectral and temporal sound features

Textbook descriptions of primary sensory cortex (PSC) revolve around single neurons representation of low-dimensional sensory features, such as visual object orientation in V1, location of somatic touch in S1, and sound frequency in A1. Typically, studies of PSC measure neurons responses along few (1 or 2) stimulus and/or behavioral dimensions. However, real-world stimuli usually vary along many feature dimensions and behavioral demands change constantly. In order to illuminate how A1 supports flexible perception in rich acoustic environments, we recorded from A1 neurons while rhesus macaques performed a feature-selective attention task. We presented sounds that varied along spectral and temporal feature dimensions (carrier bandwidth and temporal envelope, respectively). Within a block, subjects attended to one feature of the sound in a selective change detection task. We find that single neurons tend to be high-dimensional, in that they exhibit substantial mixed selectivity for both sound features, as well as task context. Contrary to common findings in many previous experiments, attention does not enhance the single-neuron representation of attended features in our data. However, a population-level analysis reveals that ensembles of neurons exhibit enhanced encoding of attended sound features, and this population code tracks subjects performance. Importantly, surrogate neural populations with intact single-neuron tuning but shuffled higher-order correlations among neurons failed to yield attention-related effects observed in the intact data. These results suggest that an emergent population code not measurable at the single-neuron level might constitute the functional unit of sensory representation in PSC. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTThe ability to adapt to a dynamic sensory environment promotes a range of important natural behaviors. We recorded from single neurons in monkey primary auditory cortex while subjects attended to either the spectral or temporal features of complex sounds. Surprisingly, we find no average increase in responsiveness to, or encoding of, the attended feature across single neurons. However, when we pool the activity of the sampled neurons via targeted dimensionality reduction, we find enhanced population-level representation of the attended feature and suppression of the distractor feature. This dissociation of the effects of attention at the level of single neurons vs. the population highlights the synergistic nature of cortical sound encoding and enriches our understanding of sensory cortical function.

neuroscience↗

Amplitude modulation encoding in auditory cortex: Comparisons between the primary and middle lateral belt regions

In macaques, the middle lateral auditory cortex (ML) is a belt region adjacent to primary auditory cortex (A1) and believed to be at a hierarchically higher level. Although ML single-unit responses have been studied for several auditory stimuli, the ability of ML cells to encode amplitude modulation (AM) - an ability which has been widely studied in A1 - has not yet been characterized. Here we compare the responses of A1 and ML neurons to amplitude modulated (AM) noise in awake macaques. While several of the basic properties of A1 and ML responses to AM noise are similar, we found several key differences. ML neurons do not phase lock as strongly, are less likely to phase lock, and are more likely to respond in a non-synchronized fashion than A1 cells, consistent with a temporal-to-rate transformation as information ascends the auditory hierarchy. ML neurons tend to have lower temporally (phase-locking) based best modulation frequencies than A1. At the level of ML, neurons that decrease firing rate with increasing modulation depth become more common than in A1. In both A1 and ML we find a prevalent class of neurons with excitatory rate responses at lower modulation frequencies and suppressed rate responses relative to the unmodulated carrier at middle modulation frequencies.

neuroscience↗