Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Sudhop, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Sudhop, S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Sequential defects in cardiac lineage commitment and maturation cause hypoplastic left heart syndrome

BackgroundComplex molecular programs in specific cell lineages govern human heart development. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) is the most common and severe manifestation within the spectrum of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction defects occurring in association with ventricular hypoplasia. The pathogenesis of HLHS is unknown, but hemodynamic disturbances are assumed to play a prominent role. MethodsTo identify perturbations in gene programs controlling ventricular muscle lineage development in HLHS, we performed: i) whole-exome sequencing of 87 HLHS parent-offspring trios, ii) nuclear transcriptomics of cardiomyocytes from ventricles of 4 patients with HLHS and 15 controls at different stages of heart development, iii) single cell RNA sequencing and iv) 3D modeling in iPSCs from 3 patients with HLHS and 3 controls. ResultsGene set enrichment and protein network analyses of damaging de-novo mutations and dysregulated genes from ventricles of patients with HLHS suggested alterations in specific gene programs and cellular processes critical during fetal ventricular cardiogenesis, including cell-cycle and cardiomyocyte maturation. Single-cell and 3D modeling with iPSCs demonstrated intrinsic defects in the cell-cycle/UPR/autophagy hub resulting in disrupted differentiation of early cardiac progenitor lineages leading to defective cardiomyocyte-subtype differentiation/maturation in HLHS. Additionally, premature cell-cycle exit of ventricular cardiomyocytes from HLHS patients prevented normal tissue responses to developmental signals for growth leading to multinucleation/polyploidy, accumulation of DNA damage, and exacerbated apoptosis, all potential drivers of left ventricular hypoplasia in absence of hemodynamic cues. ConclusionsOur results highlight that despite genetic heterogeneity in HLHS, many mutations converge on sequential cellular processes primarily driving cardiac myogenesis, suggesting novel therapeutic approaches.

developmental biology

Primate heart regeneration via migration and fibroblast repulsion by human heart progenitors

SUMMARYHuman heart regeneration is one of the most critical unmet clinical needs at a global level1. Muscular regeneration is hampered both by the limited renewing capacity of adult cardiomyocytes2-4 and the onset of cardiac fibrosis5,6, resulting in reduced compliance of the tissue. Primate have proven to be ideal models for pluripotent stem cell strategies for heart regeneration, but unravelling specific approaches to drive cell migration to the site of injury and inhibition of subsequent fibrosis have been elusive. Herein, by combining human cardiac progenitor lineage tracing and single-cell transcriptomics in injured non-human primate heart bio-mimics, we uncover the coordinated muscular regeneration of the primate heart via directed migration of human ventricular progenitors to sites of injury, subsequent fibroblast repulsion targeting fibrosis, and ultimate functional replacement of damaged cardiac muscle by differentiation and electromechanical integration. Single-cell RNAseq captured distinct modes of action, uncovering chemoattraction mediated by CXCL12/CXCR4 signalling and fibroblast repulsion regulated by SLIT2/ROBO1 guidance in organizing cytoskeletal dynamics. Moreover, transplantation of human cardiac progenitors into hypo-immunogenic CAG-LEA29Y transgenic porcine hearts following injury proved their chemotactic response and their ability to generate a remuscularized scar without the risk of arrhythmogenesis in vivo. Our study demonstrates that inherent developmental programs within cardiac progenitors are sequentially activated in the context of disease, allowing the cells to sense and counteract injury. As such, they may represent an ideal bio-therapeutic for functional heart rejuvenation.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.View Full Text

cell biology