Biology subjects

Stutt, H. R.

Publications and source records attributed to Stutt, H. R..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Dorsomedial striatal dopamine ramps down during interval timing

Dopamine is involved in disorders that degrade cognition such as Parkinsons disease, ADHD, addiction, and schizophrenia; however, it is unclear how dopamine modulates brain circuits involved in cognitive processing. We investigated this problem by recording dopamine during interval timing, an elementary task that requires executive functions to estimate an interval of several seconds by making a motor response. We harnessed the fluorescent dopamine sensor dLight1.3b to record relative dopamine dynamics in the mouse dorsomedial striatum, which integrates information from cognitive cortical circuits and is required for interval timing. We found that: 1) dopamine activity ramped down during interval timing prior to increasing at reward delivery; 2) dopamine ramping dynamics predicted interval timing behavior; and 3) dopamine ramping dynamics were distinct between male and female mice and affected by amphetamine, a potent modulator of dopamine. These data provide insight into how dopamine modulates striatal circuits during interval timing and help better understand how dopamine dynamics contribute to cognitive dysfunction in dopamine-related brain diseases.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2025

Diverse activity in prefrontal projections promotes temporal control of action

Prefrontal neurons can have diverse activity during cognitive functions like working memory, attention, and timing; however, the importance of this heterogeneity is unclear. Our goal was to better understand the diversity of prefrontal activity through connectivity. We harnessed circuit-specific tools to capture activity within prefrontal projections during interval timing, an elementary cognitive process that requires working memory for temporal rules and attention to the passage of time to estimate a temporal interval of several seconds. We used human electroencephalography and single neuronal recordings in mice to capture prefrontal activity during interval timing, with major patterns characterized by time-dependent ramping (monotonic changes) over a temporal interval. We then leveraged retrograde viruses to interrogate prefrontal cortex (PFC) projections to the mediodorsal thalamus (PFC-MD) and to the dorsomedial striatum (PFC-DMS). We report three novel results. First, circuit-specific calcium fiber photometry revealed that PFC-MD and PFC-DMS activity encoded distinct temporal signals, with PFC-MD projections ramping down and PFC-DMS ramping up to interval timing response times. Second, circuit-specific inactivation revealed that PFC-DMS inactivation disrupted animals internal estimates of time. Third, circuit-specific single-nucleus RNA sequencing of prefrontal projections revealed distinct transcriptomic profiles between PFC-MD and PFC-DMS projections, with enriched genes for cortical layers and neuromodulators, and specific genes such as Cux2, Camk2n1, Htr4, and Foxp2. These data suggest differences in gene expression and connectivity give rise to the diversity of prefrontal activity during interval timing. These findings advance our fundamental understanding of prefrontal function and dysfunction in human disease.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2024

Amphetamine increases timing variability by degrading prefrontal ramping activity

BackgroundAmphetamine is a commonly abused psychostimulant that increases synaptic catecholamine levels and impairs executive functions. However, it is unknown how acute amphetamine affects brain areas involved in executive control, such as the prefrontal cortex. We studied this problem in mice using interval timing, which requires participants to estimate an interval of several seconds with a motor response. Rodent prefrontal cortex ensembles are required for interval timing. We tested the hypothesis that amphetamine disrupts interval timing by degrading prefrontal cortex temporal encoding. MethodsWe first quantified the effects of amphetamine on interval timing performance by conducting a meta-analysis of 11 prior rodent studies. We also implanted multielectrode recording arrays in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex of 7 mice and then examined the effects of 1.5 mg/kg D-amphetamine injected intraperitoneally on interval timing behavior and prefrontal neuronal ensemble activity. ResultsA meta-analysis of previous literature revealed that amphetamine produces a large effect size on interval timing variability across studies but only a medium effect size on central tendencies of interval timing. We found a similar effect on interval timing variability in our task, which was accompanied by greater trial-to-trial variability in prefrontal ramping, attenuated interactions between pairs of ramping neurons, and dampened low-frequency oscillations. ConclusionsThese findings suggest that amphetamine alters prefrontal temporal processing by increasing the variability of prefrontal ramping. Our work provides insight into how amphetamine affects timing-related brain activity, which may be useful in developing new neurophysiological markers for amphetamine use and novel treatments targeting the prefrontal cortex.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Sex similarities and dopaminergic differences in interval timing

Rodent behavioral studies have largely focused on male animals, which has limited the generalizability and conclusions of neuroscience research. Working with humans and rodents, we studied sex effects during interval timing that requires participants to estimate an interval of several seconds by making motor responses. Interval timing requires attention to the passage of time and working memory for temporal rules. We found no differences between human females and males in interval timing response times (timing accuracy) or the coefficient of variance of response times (timing precision). Consistent with prior work, we also found no differences between female and male rodents in timing accuracy or precision. In female rodents, there was no difference in interval timing between estrus and diestrus cycle stages. Because dopamine powerfully affects interval timing, we also examined sex differences with drugs targeting dopaminergic receptors. In both female and male rodents, interval timing was delayed after administration of sulpiride (D2-receptor antagonist), quinpirole (D2-receptor agonist), and SCH-23390 (D1-receptor antagonist). By contrast, after administration of SKF-81297 (D1-receptor agonist), interval timing shifted earlier only in male rodents. These data illuminate sex similarities and differences in interval timing. Our results have relevance for rodent models of both cognitive function and brain disease by increasing represenation in behavioral neuroscience.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

Quantifying the inverted U: A meta-analysis of prefrontal dopamine, D1-receptors, and working memory

Dopamine in the prefrontal cortex can be disrupted in human disorders that affect cognitive function such as Parkinsons disease (PD), attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and schizophrenia. Dopamine has a powerful effect on prefrontal circuits via the D1-type dopamine receptor (D1DR). It has been proposed that prefrontal dopamine has "inverted U-shaped" dynamics, with optimal dopamine and D1DR signaling required for optimal cognitive function. However, the quantitative relationship between prefrontal dopamine and cognitive function is not clear. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis of published manipulations of prefrontal dopamine and the effects on working memory, a high-level executive function in humans, primates, and rodents that involves maintaining and manipulating information over seconds to minutes. We reviewed 646 papers and found that 75 studies met criteria for inclusion. Our quantification of effect sizes for dopamine, D1DRs, and behavior revealed a negative quadratic slope. This is consistent with the proposed inverted U-shape of prefrontal dopamine and D1DRs and working memory performance, explaining 10% of the variance. Of note, the inverted quadratic fit was much stronger for prefrontal D1DRs alone, explaining 26% of the variance, compared to prefrontal dopamine alone, explaining 10% of the variance. Taken together, these data, derived from a variety of manipulations and systems, demonstrate that optimal prefrontal dopamine signalling is linked with higher cognitive function. Our results provide insight into the fundamental dynamics of prefrontal dopamine, which could be useful for pharmacological interventions targeting prefrontal dopaminergic circuits, and into the pathophysiology of human brain disease.

neuroscience↗