Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Strassberg, S. S.

Publications and source records attributed to Strassberg, S. S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Craniofacial suture complexity and digging mode importance in rodents

The morphology of cranial sutures (i.e., joints that connect the bones of the skull, are sites of growth, and absorb biomechanical stresses) is highly variable, especially in mammals. Exposure to different strain regimes as a result of development, function, and ecology can drive disparity in suture complexity at both the individual and taxonomic levels. Although the relationships between diet, muscle mass, static loading, and certain behaviors (e.g., headbutting) and suture morphology are well studied, the effects of fossoriality, particularly the use of the craniodental apparatus during substrate excavation, remain largely unknown. We synthesize data using an ordinal ranking scheme for digging mode importance in 107 rodent species; premaxillofrontal and nasofrontal suture complexity as measured by sinuosity index, power spectrum density, and spectral entropy, the latter of which is a novel suture complexity metric; and Bayesian multilevel models to examine the fossoriality-suture phenotype relationship at the suborder level and above and predict digging mode usage in 11 cryptic extant species. Most fossorial rodents utilize multiple digging modes, often at varying levels of importance. Chisel-tooth digging importance is associated with reduced nasofrontal suture complexity in multiple suborders, whereas scratch digging importance is correlated with elevated complexity in the premaxillofrontal suture. Suture complexity poorly reflects head-lift digging importance. We demonstrate that fossorial function is a complex, multivariate trait and reveal new insights into the functional morphology of cranial sutures across the most diverse mammalian order.

evolutionary biology↗

Modeling effects of inter-group contact on links between population size and cultural complexity

Human populations rely on cultural artifacts and complex cumulative culture for their survival. Populations vary dramatically in the size of their tool repertoires, and the determinants of these cultural repertoire sizes have been the focus of extensive study in recent years. A prominent hypothesis, supported by computational models of cultural evolution, asserts that tool repertoire size increases with population size. However, not all empirical studies seeking to test this hypothesis have found such a correlation; this has led to a contentious and ongoing debate. As a possible resolution to this longstanding controversy, we suggest that accounting for even rare cultural migration events that allow sharing of knowledge between different-sized populations may help explain why a populations size might not always predict its cultural repertoire size. Using an agent-based model to explore different assumptions about the effects of population size and migration on tool repertoires, we find that connectivity of one population to others, particularly to large populations, may significantly boost its tool repertoire size when population interactions lead to cultural exchange. Thus, two populations of identical size may have drastically different tool repertoire sizes, hinging upon their access to other groups knowledge. Intermittent contact between populations boosts cultural repertoire size and still allows for the development of unique tool repertoires that have limited overlap between populations.

evolutionary biology↗