Biology subjects

Stoler, N.

Publications and source records attributed to Stoler, N..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2022

Altered sequencing success at non-B-DNA motifs

Modern sequencing technologies are not error-free, and might have elevated error rates at some locations of the genome. A potential cause for such elevated error rates is the formation of alternative DNA structures (non-B DNA), such as G-quadruplexes (G4s), Z-DNA, or cruciform structures, during sequencing. Approximately 13% of the human genome has the potential to form such structures, which have been previously shown to affect the activity of DNA polymerases and helicases. Here we tested whether motifs with the potential to form non-B DNA (non-B motifs) influence the sequencing success of three major sequencing technologies--Illumina, Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) HiFi, and Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT). We estimated sequencing success by computing the rates of single-nucleotide, insertion, and deletion errors, as well as by evaluating mean read depth and mean base quality. Overall, all technologies exhibited altered sequencing success for most non-B motif types. Single-nucleotide error rates were generally increased for G-quadruplexes (G4s) and Z-DNA motifs in all three technologies. Illumina and PacBio HiFi deletion error rates were also increased for all non-B types except for Z-DNA motifs, while in ONT they were increased substantially only for G4 motifs. Insertion error rates for non-B motifs were highly elevated in Illumina, moderately elevated in PacBio HiFi, and only slightly elevated in ONT. Using Poisson regression modeling, we evaluated how non-B DNA motifs and other factors influence sequencing error profiles. Using the error rates at non-B motifs, we developed a probabilistic approach to determine the number of false-positive single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) in different sample size and variant frequency cutoff scenarios, as well as in previously generated sequencing data sets (1000Genomes, Simons Genome Diversity Project, and gnomAD). Overall, the effect of non-B DNA on sequencing should be considered in downstream analyses, particularly in studies with limited read depth--e.g., single-cell and ancient DNA sequencing, as well as sequencing of pooled population samples--and when scoring variants with low frequency (e.g., singletons). Because each sequencing technology analyzed has a unique error profile at non-B motifs, a combination of different technologies should be considered in future sequencing studies of such motifs, to maximize accuracy.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2019

Increased yields of duplex sequencing data by a series of quality control tools

Duplex sequencing is currently the most reliable method to identify ultra-low frequency DNA variants by grouping sequence reads derived from the same DNA molecule into families with information on the forward and reverse strand. However, only a small proportion of reads are assembled into duplex consensus sequences, and reads with potentially valuable information are discarded at different steps of the bioinformatics pipeline, especially reads without a family. We developed a bioinformatics tool-set that analyses the tag and family composition with the purpose to understand data loss and implement modifications to maximize the data output for the variant calling. Specifically, our tools show that tags contain PCR and sequencing errors that contribute to data loss and lower DCS yields. Our tools also identified chimeras, which result in unpaired families that do not form DCS. Finally, we also developed a tool called Variant Analyzer that re-examines variant calls from raw reads and provides different summary data that categorizes the confidence level of a variant call by a tier-based system. We demonstrate that this tool identified false positive variants tagged by the tier-based classification. Furthermore, with this tool we can include reads without a family and check the reliability of the call, which increases substantially the sequencing depth for variant calling, a particular important advantage for low-input samples or low-coverage regions.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2018

Family reunion via error correction: An efficient analysis of duplex sequencing data

Duplex sequencing is the most accurate approach for identification of sequence variants present at very low frequencies. Its power comes from pooling together multiple descendants of both strands of original DNA molecules, which allows distinguishing true nucleotide substitutions from PCR amplification and sequencing artifacts. This strategy comes at a cost--sequencing the same molecule multiple times increases dynamic range but significantly diminishes coverage, making whole genome duplex sequencing prohibitively expensive. Furthermore, every duplex experiment produces a substantial proportion of singleton reads that cannot be used in the analysis and are, technically, thrown away. In this paper we demonstrate that a significant fraction of these reads contains PCR or sequencing errors within duplex tags. Correction of such errors allows \"reuniting\" these reads with their respective families increasing the output of the method and making it more cost effective. Additionally, we combine error correction strategy with a number of algorithmic improvements in a new version of the duplex analysis software, Du Novo 2.0, readily available through Galaxy, Bioconda, and as the source code.

bioinformatics↗