Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Stewart, E. E. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Stewart, E. E. M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Spatial and directional tuning of serial dependence for tracking eye movements

An attractive influence of past sensory experience on current behaviour has been observed in many domains, such as for perceptual decisions and motor responses. However, it is unclear what sort of information is integrated across trials, and the limits of this integration, especially for oculomotor behavior. Here we provide a detailed and systematic investigation of the spatial and directional tuning of serial dependence for oculomotor tracking. In a series of experiments, we measured oculomotor responses to sequences of movements: the first movement (the prior) could move at different velocities (5 or 15 deg/s), and could additionally vary in its spatial location or direction relative to the following movement. The second movement (the probe) always moved at the same velocity (10 deg/s) and was constant across all experiments. We observed that eye velocity for the probe movement was faster when following the fast prior compared to following the slow prior, replicating attractive serial dependence. Importantly, this effect stayed consistent for distances of up to 30 deg between probe and prior, strongly suggesting a retinotopic coordinate frame. When we manipulated the direction of the prior, we observed that the strength of the serial dependence on eye velocity as well as eye direction was modulated by the relative angle between prior and probe. We observed stronger serial dependence for prior directions more similar to the probe direction. The strength of the effect on eye velocity and eye direction was correlated, suggesting a shared mechanism controlling these effects. Across all experiments, we observed that even when the prior moved in the opposite direction to the probe, there was a residual attractive effect. This suggests that serial dependence for oculomotor tracking consists of two components, one retinotopic, direction-tuned component and one more general component that is not direction-specific.

neuroscience↗

A simple optical flow model explains why certain object viewpoints are special

A core challenge in perception is recognizing objects across the highly variable retinal input that occurs when objects are viewed from different directions (e.g., front vs side views). It has long been known that certain views are of particular importance, but it remains unclear why. We reasoned that characterising the computations underlying visual comparisons between objects could explain the privileged status of certain qualitatively special views. We measured pose discrimination for a wide range of objects, finding large variations in performance depending on the object and the view angle, with front and back views yielding particularly good discrimination. Strikingly, a simple and biologically plausible computational model based on measuring the projected 3D optical flow between views of objects accurately predicted both successes and failures of discrimination performance. This provides a computational account of why certain views have a privileged status. Significance statementSome viewpoints of objects are qualitatively and perceptually special, making them easier to recognize and remember. We show that qualitatively special viewpoints of familiar and novel 3D objects can be predicted by an optical-flow model that measures how points on the surface shift in the image as viewpoint changes. This provides a quantitative account for why some viewpoints of objects are perceptually special.

neuroscience↗