Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Stevenson, I. H.

Publications and source records attributed to Stevenson, I. H..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A Neural Ensemble Correlation Code for Sound Category Identification

Humans and other animals effortlessly identify sounds and categorize them into behaviorally relevant categories. Yet, the acoustic features and neural transformations that enable the formation of perceptual categories are largely unknown. Here we demonstrate that correlation statistics between frequency-organized cochlear sound channels are reflected in the neural ensemble activity of the auditory midbrain and that such activity, in turn, can contribute to discrimination of perceptual categories. Using multi-channel neural recordings in the auditory midbrain of unanesthetized rabbits, we first demonstrate that neuron ensemble correlations are highly structured in both time and frequency and can be decoded to distinguish sounds. Next, we develop a probabilistic framework for measuring the nonstationary spectro-temporal correlation statistics between frequency organized channels in an auditory model. In a 13-category sound identification task, classification accuracy is consistently high (>80%), improving with sound duration and plateauing at ~ 1-3 seconds, mirroring human performance trends. Nonstationary short-term correlation statistics are more informative about the sound category than the time-average correlation statistics (84% vs. 73% accuracy). When tested independently, the spectral and temporal correlations between the model outputs achieved a similar level of performance and appear to contribute equally. These results outline a plausible neural code in which correlation statistics between neuron ensembles of different frequencies can be read-out to identify and distinguish acoustic categories.

neuroscience

Omitted variable bias in GLMs of neural spiking activity

Generalized linear models (GLMs) have a wide range of applications in systems neuroscience describing the encoding of stimulus and behavioral variables as well as the dynamics of single neurons. However, in any given experiment, many variables that impact neural activity are not observed or not modeled. Here we demonstrate, in both theory and practice, how these omitted variables can result in biased parameter estimates for the effects that are included. In three case studies, we estimate tuning functions for common experiments in motor cortex, hippocampus, and visual cortex. We find that including traditionally omitted variables changes estimates of the original parameters and that modulation originally attributed to one variable is reduced after new variables are included. In GLMs describing single-neuron dynamics, we then demonstrate how post-spike history effects can also be biased by omitted variables. Here we find that omitted variable bias can lead to mistaken conclusions about the stability of single neuron firing. Omitted variable bias can appear in any model with confounders - where omitted variables modulate neural activity and the effects of the omitted variables covary with the included effects. Understanding how and to what extent omitted variable bias affects parameter estimates is likely to be important for interpreting the parameters and predictions of many neural encoding models.

neuroscience