Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Staples, R.

Publications and source records attributed to Staples, R..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

The Georgetown Reading in Aging Neuroimaging Dataset (GRAND): Reading and multimodal MRI data in older adults

Reading is a critical skill in modern society. Most research on reading is conducted in school age children or young adults. However, acquired brain disorders often affect reading ability, and these disorders tend to occur in older adults. It is therefore critical to examine the normative distribution of reading behavior and the brain basis of reading in older adults. Here, we provide trial-wise single word and pseudoword oral reading and lexical decision data, as well as structural, functional, and diffusion-weighted MRI data from 116 neurotypical adults aged 22 to 84 years (mean = 59). Accuracy, response times, and errors are provided for corpora that are parametrically modulated in frequency, imageability, and regularity for real words and consistency of spelling-sound mapping for pseudowords. This dataset includes both minimally processed behavior (trial-wise data) and MRI data, and participant- and item-wise summary metrics and processed MRI data. These data serve both as a normative sample for reading behavior in older adults, but also as a valuable resource for identifying novel brain-behavioral relationships.

neuroscience↗

Meaning for reading pseudowords: errors reveal semantic influences on pseudoword reading after stroke

Impaired reading, i.e., alexia, is common after left hemisphere stroke. The most common deficit in alexia is a difficulty reading aloud pronounceable novel words, also called pseudowords. While semantic and phonological processes both subserve reading real words, pseudoword reading deficits in alexia are typically ascribed to phonological deficits alone. Some theories, however, suggest that pseudoword reading relies in part on lexical-semantic knowledge, such that semantic deficits could also contribute to poor pseudoword reading in alexia. Leveraging a large sample of left-hemisphere stroke survivors, we examine the cognitive and neural substrates of pseudoword reading accuracy and two error types: lexicalization errors, where a pseudoword is incorrectly read as a real word, and nonword errors, where a pseudoword is read as an incorrect nonword. 76 left-hemisphere stroke survivors read 60 pseudowords aloud, and performed two pseudoword repetition tasks to assess phonological processing and two picture naming tasks to assess mappings between lexical semantics and phonology. Regression models assessed how pseudoword repetition and naming related to overall accuracy and rates of lexicalization and nonword errors in pseudoword reading. Voxel-based and connectome lesion-symptom mapping localized the neural territory responsible for these errors. Pseudoword repetition and naming independently related to pseudoword reading accuracy. Pseudoword repetition but not naming deficits predicted higher rates of lexicalization errors, while naming but not pseudoword repetition deficits predicted higher rates of nonword errors. Greater nonword error rate also predicted smaller imageability effects in real word reading (t(71)=-3.2, p=0.002). Lexicalization errors were associated with lesions to and disconnections of the left putamen and basal ganglia. Nonword errors were associated with lesions to the superior and middle temporal gyri, as well as broad temporo-parietal disconnections, overlapping with previous lesion-mapping results implicating these regions in semantic contributions to word reading. These results suggest that lexicalization errors result from impaired planning and execution of novel motor plans, causing a reliance on the well-learned motor plans associated with lexical items. In contrast, greater rates of nonword errors, relative to lexicalization errors, occur when semantic contributions to reading are impaired. Overall, these findings demonstrate that semantic processes are involved in reading pseudowords, at least in stroke alexia. These findings support connectionist accounts of reading in which damage in the direct orthography to phonology route for reading leads to greater reliance on semantic representations, even for pseudowords, suggesting a reinterpretation of pseudoword reading as a pure measure of phonological deficits in reading.

neuroscience↗

Simulating the spectrum, not the syndrome: Large scale individualized modeling of oral reading in stroke aphasia

Computational models are a linchpin in our understanding of the neurocognitive basis of reading. These models can simulate idealized profiles of alexia syndromes, but in reality, individuals with alexia present with a wide range of mixed deficits rather than idealized syndromes. To provide a complete cognitive theory of reading, computational models must be able to account for this individual variation. However, this has never been demonstrated. We test oral reading and non-reading phonological and semantic processing in 83 left-hemisphere stroke survivors. We show that individual alexia profiles can be simulated by applying graded phonology and semantic lesions to an artificial neural network model of reading, creating "matched models" that represent individual stroke survivors. The severity of damage to the semantic and phonological layers of the matched models was highly correlated with directly-measured semantic and phonological processing deficits. However, we also identify systematic ways in which the models fail to simulate the reading performance of their matched stroke survivors. Our results support theories of alexia that rely on process-based deficits, demonstrate the feasibility of large-scale individualized modelling of alexia, and suggest ways to further improve the correspondence of models and human reading behavior.

neuroscience↗

Dissecting the sublexical route for reading: Frontal and parietal networks support learned orthography-to-phonology mappings

Oral reading relies on lexical and sublexical processes with distinct neural mechanisms. Damage within the sublexical system causes phonological alexia, a blanket diagnosis describing acquired deficits in reading unfamiliar words. Improving the precision of alexia diagnosis requires understanding the neurocognitive basis of specific reading subprocesses. This study investigated the neural correlates of sublexical reading in 64 adults with chronic left-hemisphere stroke (LHS), focusing on lesions that impair the use of learned orthography-to-phonology (OP) mappings to read new words. Participants read aloud real words and three types of pseudowords varying in the number of plausible OP mappings at the level of the orthographic body: zero mappings (0M), one mapping (1M), and multiple mappings (MM). LHS participants exhibited phonological reading deficits with an exaggerated lexicality effect compared to 71 neurotypical controls. Across both groups, pseudowords with learned OP mappings were read more accurately than those without. Voxelwise and connectome-based lesion-symptom mapping revealed that relative lexical reading deficits were associated with lateral temporal lesions, while sublexical reading deficits were associated with lesions or disconnections of the left inferior frontal (IFG), supramarginal, and pre/postcentral gyri. Applying learned OP mappings relied on anterior IFG and frontoparietal connections, while resolving multiple plausible OP mappings relied on intraparietal connections. These results underscore the role of learned mutigraphemic OP mappings in sublexical reading, and demonstrate that disruptions of different sublexical reading subprocesses result in subtly different deficit patterns. Dissecting the neurocognitive basis of reading subprocesses may improve the precision of alexia diagnosis and point to new treatments.

neuroscience↗

Meaning for reading: The neurocognitive basis of semantic reading impairment after stroke

Diagnosis of alexia has historically focused on syndromes, such as surface alexia, which capture discrete patterns of reading deficits observed in some patients, but do not describe the breadth of reading deficits observed in practice. Aphasia research has recently shifted focus to language process impairments rather than syndromic classifications. A similar shift in focus to reading process impairments may improve our diagnostic approach to alexia. Behavioural evidence suggests that semantic processing influences reading aloud, and that semantic deficits in the context of semantic dementia underlie surface alexia. Because stroke rarely causes loss of semantic knowledge and surface alexia as a syndromic diagnosis is unusual after stroke, semantic reading deficits in stroke alexia have not previously been examined systematically. Semantic reading deficits in stroke may not relate to semantic deficits per se, but rather an inability to use semantics to support reading. Imageability, the degree to which a word brings to mind an image, is one index of semantic influences on reading. High imageability words are read more quickly by healthy persons and more accurately following brain damage. Here, we test if deficits of semantic reading after stroke, as indexed by reduced imageability effects, result from semantic or post-semantic processes. Examining nonverbal semantic processing, semantics-phonology mapping, and semantic control in a sample of 56 left-hemisphere stroke survivors, only semantics-phonology mappings predicted the reading advantage for high imageability words over low imageability words. Support vector regression voxel-based lesion symptom mapping revealed that damage along the superior temporal sulcus and underlying white matter, extending into both the middle and superior temporal gyri, reduced the advantage of high imageability over low imageability words during reading, reflecting an inability to use semantics to support reading. A similar cluster related to impairments in semantics-phonology mapping. The imageability and semantics-phonology mapping results overlapped in the left posterior superior temporal sulcus. Support vector regression connectome lesion symptom mapping revealed white matter disconnections within a broad temporoparietal network important for both phonological and semantic processing were associated with a reduction of the imageability advantage during reading. These results demonstrate that, irrespective of syndromic classification, semantic reading deficits occur in left-hemisphere stroke survivors as a result of impaired integration of semantic and phonological representations, and that the left posterior superior temporal sulcus underlies this process. Our results clarify the neurobiology of reading aloud, and support the existence of a post-semantic impairment of semantic reading in left-hemisphere stroke survivors.

neuroscience↗