Biology subjects

Stanchak, K. E.

Publications and source records attributed to Stanchak, K. E..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Active learnings impact on student course performance in STEM varies by type and intensity

We updated a recent meta-analysis of active learnings impact on student achievement in undergraduate STEM courses by following the same protocol to evaluate studies published from 2010-2017. We screened 1659 papers, coded 1294, and found 210 that met five pre-established inclusion criteria and six pre-established criteria for methodological quality. After further dropping 76 studies with no exam scores data, 134 of these studies contained data on student performance on identical or equivalent exams. We found that on average, active learnings effect size on exam scores was 0.519 {+/-} 0.049, meaning that when students are in active learning classes, they perform roughly half a standard deviation higher on an identical exam. Funnel plots and sensitivity analyses indicated that these results were not due to sampling bias. Active learning had a positive impact on student outcomes regardless of class size, course level, or STEM discipline, though there was heterogeneity in the effects. All of these results are very similar when compared to earlier meta-analyses, however increased resolution in the studies analyzed here revealed two novel results. First, student performance was significantly better in courses that employed high-intensity active learning, defined as students being on task at least two-thirds of class time, versus lower-intensities. Additionally, there was significant heterogeneity in efficacy across different types of active learning employed. These results suggest that most, if not all types of active learning are effective, and that when innovating in their classes, instructors should continually work to increase active learning intensity. We urge caution in interpreting the results on active learning types, however, and propose a preliminary framework for making more-sophisticated and reliable analyses of variation in course design. Finally, the evidence presented here for active learnings impact on student outcomes creates a strong foundation for faculty professional development and administration.

scientific communication and education↗

bioRxiv2023

Intraspecific variation in the placement of campaniform sensilla on the wings of the hawkmoth Manduca sexta

Flight control requires active sensory feedback, and insects have many sensors that help them estimate their current locomotor state, including campaniform sensilla, which are mechanoreceptors that sense strain resulting from deformation of the cuticle. Campaniform sensilla on the wing detect bending and torsional forces encountered during flight, providing input to the flight feedback control system. During flight, wings experience complex spatio-temporal strain patterns. Because campaniform sensilla detect only local strain, their placement on the wing is presumably critical for determining the overall representation of wing deformation; however, how these sensilla are distributed across wings is largely unknown. Here, we test the hypothesis that campaniform sensilla are found in stereotyped locations across individuals of Manduca sexta, a hawkmoth. We found that although campaniform sensilla are consistently found on the same veins or in the same regions of the wings, their total number and distribution can vary extensively. This suggests that there is some robustness to variation in sensory feedback in the insect flight control system. The regions where campaniform sensilla are consistently found provide clues to their functional roles, although some patterns might be reflective of developmental processes. Collectively, our results on intraspecific variation in campaniform sensilla placement on insect wings will help reshape our thinking on the utility of mechanosensory feedback for insect flight control and guide further experimental and comparative studies.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

A cautionary note on quantitative measures of phenotypic convergence

Tests of phenotypic convergence can provide evidence of adaptive evolution, and the popularity of such studies has grown in recent years due to the development of novel, quantitative methods for identifying and measuring convergence. These methods include the commonly applied C1-C4 measures of Stayton (2015), which measure morphological distances between lineages, and Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (OU) evolutionary model-fitting analyses, which test whether lineages convergently evolved toward adaptive peaks. We test the performance of C-measures and other convergence measures under various evolutionary scenarios and reveal a critical issue with C-measures: they often misidentify divergent lineages as convergent. We address this issue by developing novel convergence measures--Ct1-Ct4-measures--that measure distances between lineages at specific points in time, minimizing the possibility of misidentifying divergent taxa as convergent. Ct-measures are most appropriate when focal lineages are of the same or similar geologic ages (e.g., extant taxa), meaning that the lineages evolutionary histories include considerable overlap in time. Beyond C-measures, we find that all convergence measures are influenced by the position of focal taxa in phenotypic space, with morphological outliers often statistically more likely to be measured as strongly convergent by chance. Further, we mimic scenarios in which researchers assess convergence using OU models with a priori regime assignments (e.g., classifying taxa by ecological traits), and we find that multiple-regime OU models with phenotypically divergent lineages assigned to a shared selective regime often outperform simpler models. This highlights that model support for these multiple-regime OU models should not be assumed to always reflect convergence among focal lineages of a shared regime. Our new Ct1-Ct4-measures provide researchers with an improved comparative tool, but we emphasize that all available convergence measures are imperfect, and researchers should recognize the limitations of these methods and use multiple lines of evidence when inferring and measuring convergence.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2022

Molecular markers of mechanosensation in glycinergic neurons in the avian lumbosacral spinal cord

Birds are exceptionally adept at controlling their body position. For example, they can coordinate rapid movements of their body while stabilizing their head. Intriguingly, this ability may rely in part on a mechanosensory organ in the avian lower spinal cord called the lumbosacral organ (LSO). However, molecular mechanotransduction mechanisms have not been identified in the avian spinal cord. Here, we report the presence of glycinergic neurons in the LSO that exhibit immunoreactivity for myosin7a and epsin, molecules essential for function and maintenance of hair cells in the inner ear. Specifically, we find glycinergic cell bodies near the central canal and processes that extend laterally to the accessory lobes and spinal ligaments. These LSO neurons are reminiscent of glycinergic neurons in a recently-described lateral spinal proprioceptive organ in zebrafish that detects spinal bending. The avian LSO, however, is located inside a series of fused vertebrae called the synsacrum, which constrains spinal bending. We suggest the LSO may be a modification and elaboration of a pre-existing mechanosensory spinal network in vertebrates. A mechanistic understanding of its function may be an important clue to understanding the evolution and development of avian locomotion.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

The balance hypothesis for the avian lumbosacral organ and an exploration of its morphological variation

ABSTRACTBirds (Aves) exhibit exceptional and diverse locomotor behaviors, including the exquisite ability to balance on two feet. How birds so precisely control their movements may be partly explained by a set of intriguing modifications in their lower spine. These modifications are collectively known as the lumbosacral organ (LSO) and are found in the fused lumbosacral vertebrae called the synsacrum. They include a set of transverse canal-like recesses in the synsacrum that align with lateral lobes of the spinal cord, as well as a dorsal groove in the spinal cord that houses an egg-shaped glycogen body. Based on compelling but primarily observational data, the most recent functional hypotheses for the LSO consider it to be a secondary balance organ, in which the transverse canals are analogous to the semicircular canals of the inner ear. If correct, this hypothesis would reshape our understanding of avian locomotion, yet the LSO has been largely overlooked in the recent literature. Here, we review the current evidence for this hypothesis and then explore a possible relationship between the LSO and balance-intensive locomotor ecologies. Our comparative morphological dataset consists of micro-computed tomography (μ-CT) scans of synsacra from ecologically diverse species. We find that birds that perch tend to have more prominent transverse canals, suggesting that the LSO is useful for balance-intensive behaviors. We then identify the crucial outstanding questions about LSO structure and function. The LSO may be a key innovation that allows independent but coordinated motion of the head and the body, and a full understanding of its function and evolution will require multiple interdisciplinary research efforts.Jargon-Free Birds have an uncanny ability to move their heads independently of their bodies. They can keep their heads remarkably still to focus on their prey while twisting in flight or perched on a bouncing branch. How are they able to do this? Like us, birds have balance organs in their inner ears that act like gyroscopes. Surprisingly, birds may have an additional balance organ known as the “lumbosacral organ” in their spine, right above their legs, which might help them sense the movement of their body separately from their head. This second balance organ may have played a very important role in bird evolution and how birds move, but it has seldom been considered in recent scientific studies. This intriguing hypothesis is based in part on a series of fluid-filled, canal-like recesses in the bone surrounding the spinal cord, which resemble the semicircular canals of the inner ear. We looked for evidence of these canal-like recesses in many different bird species, and we found it in every bird we examined. We also found that birds that perch often have deeper recesses than birds that do not perch, suggesting these canals help maintain balance. This paper presents those findings, reviews the existing research, and identifies some key questions that need to be asked to advance our understanding of this fascinating and mysterious part of the bird spinal cord.View Full Text

zoology↗

bioRxiv2018

Anatomical diversification of a skeletal novelty in bat feet

Neomorphic, membrane-associated skeletal rods are found in disparate vertebrate lineages, but their evolution is poorly understood. Here we show that one of these elements--the calcar of bats (Chiroptera)--is a skeletal novelty that has anatomically diversified. Our comparisons of evolutionary models of calcar length and corresponding disparity-through-time analyses indicate that the calcar diversified early in the evolutionary history of Chiroptera, as bats systematically radiated after evolving the capacity for flight. We find interspecific variation in a variety of anatomical parameters of probable importance for calcar function, which suggests that adaptive advantages provided by the calcar led to its anatomical diversification. In addition to overall length, we find that the calcar varies among bats in its tissue composition, and a synovial joint is present at the articulation between the calcar and the calcaneus ankle bone in some species. This suggests the calcar has a kinematic functional role. Our results demonstrate that novel skeletal additions can become integrated into vertebrate body plans and subsequently evolve into a variety of forms, potentially impacting clade diversification by expanding the available morphological space into which organisms can evolve.

evolutionary biology↗