Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Stahl, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Stahl, S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

The extent of myeloid skewing in blood is a biomarker of biological aging in mice and humans

Myeloid skewing is a central and therefore often cited hallmark of hematopoietic aging. Myeloid skewing refers to an elevated myeloid-to-lymphoid cell ratio in aged compared to young mice. Interestingly, whether the extent of myeloid skewing might be in itself a quantitative biological marker of aging has not been addressed yet, nor whether this parameter has also relevance for the extent of aging in humans. Aged mice with high level of myeloid skewing (>50% myeloid cells in blood) showed accelerated hematopoietic aging compared to mice with a low level of myeloid skewing (<30% of myeloid cells in blood), as well as an increased level of inflammatory cytokines and elevated levels of diseases. Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) from mice with high myeloid skewing showed an impaired repopulation capacity. Epigenetic clock analyses demonstrated that mice with a high level of myeloid skewing present with a biological age that is older than their chronological age. In humans, a high degree of myeloid skewing was associated with elevated levels of inflammatory markers, reduced mobility, a greater burden of comorbidities, and an increased mortality hazard ratio. The data support that, besides overall myeloid skewing being a central hallmark of aging in mice, the extent of the frequency of myeloid cells in blood might serve as a biological marker of aging and disease in both mice and humans. Key PointsThe extent of myeloid skewing in aged mice correlates to an increased hematological and epigenetic age and increased disease burden. The extent of myeloid skewing in older adults is associated with an increased hazard ratio of mortality and correlates with higher frailty and inflammatory markers.

cell biology↗

A Fixed Moderate-dose Combination of Tiletamine+Zolazepam Outperforms Midazolam in Induction of Short-term Immobilization of Ball Pythons (Python regius)

Laboratory animals are commonly anesthetized to prevent pain and distress and to provide safe handling. Anesthesia procedures are well-developed for common laboratory mammals, but not as well established in reptiles. We assessed the performance of intramuscularly injected tiletamine (dissociative anesthetic) and zolazepam (benzodiazepine sedative) in fixed combination (2 mg/kg and 3 mg/kg) in comparison to 2 mg/kg of midazolam (benzodiazepine sedative) in ball pythons (Python regius). We measured heart and respiratory rates and quantified induction parameters (i.e., time to loss of righting reflex, time to loss of withdrawal reflex) and recovery parameters (i.e., time to regain righting reflex, withdrawal reflex, normal behavior). Mild decreases in heart and respiratory rates (median decrease of <10 beats per minute and <5 breaths per minute) were observed for most time points among all three anesthetic dose groups. No statistically significant difference between the median time to loss of righting reflex was observed among animals of any group (p = 0.783). However, the withdrawal reflex was lost in all snakes receiving 3mg/kg of tiletamine+zolazepam but not in all animals of the other two groups (p = 0.0004). In addition, the time for animals to regain the righting reflex and resume normal behavior was longer in the drug combination dose groups compared to the midazolam group (p = 0.0055). Our results indicate that midazolam is an adequate sedative for ball pythons but does not suffice to achieve reliable immobilization or anesthesia, whereas tiletamine+zolazepam achieves short-term anesthesia in a dose-dependent manner.

zoology↗