Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Stahl, E. L.

Publications and source records attributed to Stahl, E. L..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Hyperactivity in mice induced by opioid agonists with partial intrinsic efficacy and biased agonism; alone and in combination with morphine

Opioid analgesics like morphine and fentanyl induce mu-opioid receptor (MOR)-mediated hyperactivity in mice. Here we show that morphine, fentanyl, SR-17018, and oliceridine have submaximal intrinsic efficacy in the mouse striatum using 35S-GTP{gamma}S binding assays. While all of the agonists act as partial agonists for stimulating G protein coupling in striatum, morphine, fentanyl and oliceridine are fully efficacious in stimulating locomotor activity; meanwhile, the noncompetitive biased agonists, SR-17018 and SR-15099 produce submaximal hyperactivity. Moreover, the combination of SR-17018 and morphine attenuates hyperactivity while antinociceptive efficacy is increased. The combination of oliceridine with morphine increases hyperactivity which is maintained over time. These findings provide evidence that noncompetitive agonists at MOR can be used to suppress morphine-induced hyperactivity while enhancing antinociceptive efficacy; moreover, they demonstrate that intrinsic efficacy measured at the receptor level is not directly proportional to drug efficacy in the locomotor activity assay.

pharmacology and toxicology↗

Re-evaluating how low intrinsic efficacy and apparent bias for G protein activation relates to the improved side effect profiles of new opioid agonists

In a recent report in Science Signaling (DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.aaz3140), it was suggested that low intrinsic agonism, and not biased agonism, leads to an improvement in the separation of potency in opioid-induced respiratory suppression versus antinociception. Although many of the compounds that were tested have been shown to display G protein signaling bias in prior publications, the authors conclude that since they cannot detect biased agonism in their cellular signaling studies the compounds are therefore not biased agonists. Rather, they conclude that it is low intrinsic efficacy that leads to the therapeutic window improvement. Intrinsic efficacy is the extent to which an agonist can stimulate a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) response in a system, while biased agonism takes into consideration not only intrinsic efficacy, but also potency of an agonist in an assay. Herein, we have re-analyzed the data presented in the published work (DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.aaz3140) (including the recent Erratum: DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.abf9803) to derive intrinsic efficacy and bias factors as {Delta}{Delta}log({tau}/KA) and {Delta}{Delta}log(Emax/EC50). Based on this reanalysis, the data support the conclusion that biased agonism, favoring G protein signaling, was observed. Moreover, a conservation of rank order intrinsic efficacy was not observed upon comparing responses in each assay, further suggesting that multiple active receptor states were present. These observations agree with prior studies wherein oliceridine, PZM21 and SR-17018 were first described as biased agonists with improvement in antinociception over respiratory suppression in mice. Therefore, the data in the Science Signaling manuscript does provide strong corroborating evidence that G protein signaling bias may be a means to improve opioid analgesia while avoiding certain undesirable side effects.

pharmacology and toxicology↗