Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Srivastava, D. S.

Publications and source records attributed to Srivastava, D. S..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Climate influences the response of community functional traits to local conditions

Functional traits determine an organisms performance in a given environment and as such determine which organisms will be found where. Species respond to local conditions, but also to larger scale gradients, such as climate. Trait ecology links these responses of species to community composition and species distributions. Yet, we often do not know which environmental gradients are most important in determining community trait composition at either local or biogeographical scales, or their interaction. Here we quantify the relative contribution of local and climatic conditions to the structure and composition of functional traits found within bromeliad invertebrate communities. We conclude that climate explains more variation in invertebrate trait composition within bromeliads than does local conditions. Importantly, climate mediated the response of traits to local conditions; for example, invertebrates with benthic life-history traits increased with bromeliad water volume only under certain precipitation regimes. Our ability to detect this and other patterns hinged on the compilation of multiple fine-grained datasets, allowing us to contrast the effect of climate vs. local conditions. We suggest that, in addition to sampling communities at local scales, we need to aggregate studies that span large ranges in climate variation in order to fully understand trait filtering at local, regional and global scales.

ecology↗

Working groups, gender and publication impact of Canada's ecology and evolution faculty

ABSTRACTA critical part of science is the extraction of general principles by synthesizing results from many different studies or disciplines. In the fields of ecology and evolution, a popular method to conduct synthesis science is in working groups – that is, research collaborations based around intensive week-long meetings. We present in this report an analysis of the impact of working group participation and gender on the publication impact of ecology and evolution faculty at Canadian universities who were research active over the last three decades (N=1408). Women are underrepresented in this research population relative to the general population, and even the Canadian faculty population. Participation in working groups not only benefits science, but also benefits the researchers involved by accelerating the temporal increase in their H-index. However, this benefit is particularly driven by senior male researchers. The effect is weaker for female researchers and even negative for researchers within 4 years of their PhD. However, gender does not affect current participation rates in working groups, nor reported indirect benefits – such as future collaborations, funding and data resources. The results of this study suggest that working groups can act as career catalysts for researchers, but that – as in many areas of science – there are challenging issues of equity that require action. Because the H-index is a cumulative measure, gender inequities from before the turn of the millenium may still be distorting the perceived publication impact of today’s research-active faculty.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.View Full Text

scientific communication and education↗

Food web networks shift across a precipitation gradient due to changes in community composition and species interactions.

Ecological networks change across spatial and environmental gradients due to (i) changes in species composition or (ii) changes in the frequency or strength of interactions. Here we use the communities of aquatic invertebrates inhabiting clusters of bromeliad phytotelms along the Brazilian coast as a model system for examining turnover in the properties of ecological networks. We first document the variation in the species pools of sites across a geographical climate gradient. Using the same sites, we also explored the geographic variation in species interaction strength using a newly developed Markov network approach. We found that community composition differed along a gradient of water volume within bromeliads due to the turnover of some species. From the Markov network analysis, we found that the top-down effects of certain predators differed geographically, which could also be explained by geographic differences in bromeliad water volumes. Overall, this study illustrates how a network can change across an environmental gradient through both changes in both species and their interactions.

ecology↗

Predator phylogenetic diversity decreases predation rate via antagonistic interactions

BackgroundPredator assemblages can differ substantially in their top-down effects on community composition and ecosystem function, but few studies have sought to explain this variation in terms of the phylogenetic distance between predators. The effect of a local predator assemblage will depend on three things - which predators tend to co-occur, how similar their prey preferences are, and how they interact with each other and the whole community. Phylogenetic distance between predators may correlate with each of these processes, either because related predators are more likely to share the same traits, and therefore have similar habitat and prey preferences, or because predators are more likely to compete, and therefore diverge in habitat and prey preferences. Therefore, the phylogenetic structure of predator assemblages could provide a unifying framework for predicting how predators will impact their prey - and therefore any ecosystem functions mediated by their prey.\n\nMethodsWe examined the effects of predators on macroinvertebrate food webs found in bromeliads, combining field observations, laboratory feeding trials and a manipulative experiment. We determined whether the phylogenetic distance between predators could explain: the co-observed occurrence of predator species among bromeliads, overlap in prey preferences under no-choice conditions, and effects of predator composition on prey survival, prey composition and ecosystem processes.\n\nResultsWe found that phylogenetic distance does not predict either the co-occurrence of predator species nor the overlap in their prey preferences. However, our manipulative experiment showed that prey mortality decreased as the phylogenetic distance between predator species increased, reflecting antagonistic interactions among more distant predators. These effects of phylogenetic distance on prey mortality did not translate into effects on ecosystem function, as measured by rates of detrital decomposition and nitrogen cycling.\n\nDiscussionWe conclude that the effects of predator phylogenetic diversity on the bromeliad food web are primarily determined by antagonistic predator-predator interac-tions, rather than habitat distribution or diet overlap. This study illustrates the potential of a phylogenetic community approach to understanding food webs dynamics.

ecology↗