Biology subjects

Sousa da Mota, B.

Publications and source records attributed to Sousa da Mota, B..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2023

Assessing the impact of post-mortem damage and contamination on imputation performance in ancient DNA

Low-coverage imputation is becoming ever more present in ancient DNA (aDNA) studies. Imputation pipelines commonly used for present-day genomes have been shown to yield accurate results when applied to ancient genomes. However, post-mortem damage (PMD), in the form of C-to-T substitutions at the reads termini, and contamination with DNA from closely related species can potentially affect imputation performance in aDNA. In this study, we evaluated imputation performance i) when using a genotype caller designed for aDNA, ATLAS, compared to bcftools, and ii) when contamination is present. We evaluated imputation performance with principal component analyses (PCA) and by calculating imputation error rates. With a particular focus on differently imputed sites, we found that using ATLAS prior to imputation substantially improved imputed genotypes for a very damaged ancient genome (42% PMD). For the remaining genomes, ATLAS brought limited gains. Finally, to examine the effect of contamination on imputation, we added various amounts of reads from two present-day genomes to a previously downsampled high-coverage ancient genome. We observed that imputation accuracy drastically decreased for contamination rates above 5%. In conclusion, we recommend i) accounting for PMD by using a genotype caller such as ATLAS before imputing highly damaged genomes and ii) only imputing genomes containing up to 5% of contamination.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2022

Imputation of low-coverage sequencing data from 150,119 UK Biobank genomes

Recent work highlights the advantages of low-coverage whole genome sequencing (lcWGS), followed by genotype imputation, as a cost-effective genotyping technology for statistical and population genetics. The release of whole genome sequencing data for 150,119 UK Biobank (UKB) samples represents an unprecedented opportunity to impute lcWGS with high accuracy. However, despite recent progress1,2, current methods struggle to cope with the growing numbers of samples and markers in modern reference panels, resulting in unsustainable computational costs. For instance, the imputation cost for a single genome is 1.11{pound} using GLIMPSE v1.1.1 (GLIMPSE1) on the UKB research analysis platform (RAP) and rises to 242.8{pound} using QUILT v1.0.4. To overcome this computational burden, we introduce GLIMPSE v2.0.0 (GLIMPSE2), a major improvement of GLIMPSE, that scales sublinearly in both the number of samples and markers. GLIMPSE2 imputes a low-coverage genome from the UKB reference panel for only 0.08{pound} in compute cost while retaining high accuracy for both ancient and modern genomes, particularly at rare variants (MAF < 0.1%) and for very low-coverage samples (0.1x-0.5x).

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2022

Imputation of ancient genomes

Due to postmortem DNA degradation, most ancient genomes sequenced to date have low depth of coverage, preventing the true underlying genotypes from being recovered. Genotype imputation has been put forward to improve genotyping accuracy for low-coverage genomes. However, it is unknown to what extent imputation of ancient genomes produces accurate genotypes and whether imputation introduces bias to downstream analyses. To address these questions, we downsampled 43 ancient genomes, 42 of which are high-coverage (above 10x) and three constitute a trio (mother, father and son), from different times and continents to simulate data with coverage in the range of 0.1x-2.0x and imputed these using state-of-the-art methods and reference panels. We assessed imputation accuracy across ancestries and depths of coverage. We found that ancient and modern DNA imputation accuracies were comparable. We imputed most of the 42 high-coverage genomes downsampled to 1x with low error rates (below 5%) and estimated higher error rates for African genomes, which are underrepresented in the reference panel. We used the ancient trio data to validate imputation and phasing results using an orthogonal approach based on Mendels rules of inheritance. This resulted in imputation and switch error rates of 1.9% and 2.0%, respectively, for 1x genomes. We further compared the results of downstream analyses between imputed and high-coverage genomes, notably principal component analysis (PCA), genetic clustering, and runs of homozygosity (ROH). For these three approaches, we observed similar results between imputed and high-coverage genomes using depths of coverage of at least 0.5x, except for African genomes, for which the decreased imputation accuracy impacted ROH estimates. Altogether, these results suggest that, for most populations and depths of coverage as low as 0.5x, imputation is a reliable method with potential to expand and improve ancient DNA studies.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2022

Population Genomics of Stone Age Eurasia

Western Eurasia witnessed several large-scale human migrations during the Holocene1-5. To investigate the cross-continental impacts we shotgun-sequenced 317 primarily Mesolithic and Neolithic genomes from across Northern and Western Eurasia. These were imputed alongside published data to obtain diploid genotypes from >1,600 ancient humans. Our analyses revealed a Great Divide genomic boundary extending from the Black Sea to the Baltic. Mesolithic hunter-gatherers (HGs) were highly genetically differentiated east and west of this zone, and the impact of the neolithisation was equally disparate. Large-scale ancestry shifts occurred in the west as farming was introduced, including near-total replacements of HGs in many areas, whereas no substantial ancestry shifts happened east of the zone during the same period. Similarly, relatedness decreased in the west from the Neolithic transition onwards, while east of the Urals relatedness remained high until [~]4,000 BP, consistent with persistence of localised HG groups. The boundary dissolved when Yamnaya-related ancestry spread across western Eurasia around 5,000 BP resulting in a second major turnover that reached most parts of Europe within a 1,000-year span. The genetic origin and fate of the Yamnaya have remained elusive but we demonstrate that HGs from the Middle Don region contributed ancestry to them. Yamnaya-groups later admixed with individuals associated with the Globular Amphora Culture before expanding into Europe. Similar turnovers occurred in western Siberia, where we report new genomic data from a Neolithic steppe cline spanning the Siberian forest steppe to Lake Baikal. These prehistoric migrations had profound and lasting effects on the genetic diversity of Eurasian populations.

evolutionary biology↗