Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Soudet, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Soudet, J..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Anisomycin-induced ribosome collisions follow a dose-dependent positional rule, distinct from the UV-induced collision landscape

Ribosome collisions trigger stress pathways such as the ribotoxic stress response (RSR), yet how different ribosome-impairing stimuli shape where collisions form on mRNAs remains unclear. Here, we combine monosome- and disome-resolved ribosome profiling with proteomics of collided-ribosome fractions to compare anisomycin- and UV-induced ribosome impairment in mouse embryonic stem cells. Low-dose anisomycin, a widely used collision-inducing paradigm, does not generate collisions dispersed along transcripts but a post-initiation collision zone, with stalled monosomes and disomes accumulating within the first ~70 nucleotides of coding sequences across most translated mRNAs. High-dose anisomycin, commonly considered collision-poor, produces the same pattern shifted closer to the start codon and reduced in amplitude. These observations support a single dose-dependent positional rule, in which drug occupancy determines how far ribosomes progress before arrest and ongoing initiation supplies trailing ribosomes. In contrast, 30 min after UV irradiation, collisions are detectable biochemically but appear more dispersed, with few recurrent hotspots and preferential accumulation on highly translated mRNAs. Collided-ribosome fractions share enrichment of the collision sensor EDF1 across conditions, whereas recruitment of ZNF598 and initiation factors is most evident after UV. Our results refine the interpretation of anisomycin-based collision paradigms and show that collision landscapes depend on the nature of the stimulus.

molecular biology↗

Refined mechanism of promoter Nucleosome-Depleted Regions resetting after replication

Replication disrupts chromatin organization. Thus, the rapid resetting of nucleosome positioning is essential to maintain faithful gene expression. The initial step of this reconfiguration occurs at Nucleosome-Depleted Regions (NDRs). While studies have elucidated the role of Transcription Factors (TFs) and Chromatin Remodelers (CRs) in vitro or in maintaining NDRs in vivo, none has addressed their in vivo function shortly after replication. Through purification of nascent chromatin in yeast, we dissected the choreography of events governing the proper positioning of the -1/+1 nucleosomes flanking promoter NDRs. Our findings reveal that CRs are the primary contributors of -1/+1 repositioning post-replication, with RSC acting upstream of INO80. Surprisingly, while Reb1 and Abf1 TFs are not essential for NDR resetting, they are required for NDR maintenance via the promotion of H3 acetylations. Altogether, we propose a two-step model for NDR resetting in S. cerevisiae: first, CRs alone reset promoter NDRs after replication, while a combination of TFs and CRs is required for subsequent maintenance. TeaserRSC acts upstream of INO80 for NDR re-establishment after replication followed by a combined action of CRs and TFs for NDR maintenance.

molecular biology↗

Antisense non-coding transcription represses the PHO5 model gene via remodelling of promoter chromatin structure

Pervasive transcription of eukaryotic genomes generates non-coding transcripts with regulatory potential. We examined the effects of non-coding antisense transcription on the regulation of expression of the yeast PHO5 gene, a paradigmatic case for gene regulation through promoter chromatin remodeling. A negative role for antisense transcription at the PHO5 gene locus was demonstrated by leveraging the level of overlapping antisense transcription through specific mutant backgrounds, expression from a strong promoter in cis, and use of the CRISPRi system. Furthermore, we showed that enhanced elongation of PHO5 antisense leads to a more repressive chromatin conformation at the PHO5 gene promoter, which is more slowly remodeled upon gene induction. The negative effect of antisense transcription on PHO5 gene transcription is mitigated upon inactivation of the histone deacetylase Rpd3, showing that PHO5 antisense RNA acts via histone deacetylation. This regulatory pathway leads to Rpd3-dependent decreased recruitment of the RSC chromatin remodeling complex to the PHO5 gene promoter upon induction of antisense transcription. Overall, the data in this work reveal an additional level in the complex regulatory mechanism of PHO5 gene expression by showing antisense transcription-mediated repression at the level of promoter chromatin structure remodeling.

molecular biology↗

Antisense-mediated repression of SAGA-dependent genes involves the HIR histone chaperone

Eukaryotic genomes are pervasively transcribed by RNA polymerase II (RNAPII), and transcription of long non-coding RNAs often overlaps with coding gene promoters. This might lead to coding gene repression in a process named Transcription Interference (TI). In Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae), TI is mainly driven by antisense non-coding transcription and occurs through re-shaping of promoter Nucleosome-Depleted Regions (NDRs). In this study, we developed a genetic screen to identify new players involved in Antisense-Mediated Transcription Interference (AMTI). Among the candidates, we found the HIR histone chaperone complex known to be involved in de novo histone deposition. Using genome-wide approaches, we reveal that HIR-dependent histone deposition represses the promoters of SAGA-dependent genes via antisense non-coding transcription. However, while antisense transcription is enriched at promoters of SAGA-dependent genes, this feature is not sufficient to define the mode of gene regulation. We further show that the balance between HIR-dependent nucleosome incorporation and transcription factor binding at promoters directs transcription into a SAGA- or TFIID-dependent regulation. This study sheds light on a new connection between antisense non-coding transcription and the nature of coding transcription initiation.

molecular biology↗

Fine chromatin-driven mechanism of transcription interference by antisense noncoding transcription

Eukaryotic genomes are almost entirely transcribed by RNA polymerase II (RNAPII). Consequently, the transcription of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) often overlaps with coding gene promoters triggering potential gene repression through a poorly characterized mechanism of transcription interference. In this study, we propose a global model of chromatin-based transcription interference in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae). By using a noncoding transcription inducible strain, we analyzed the relationship between antisense elongation and coding sense repression, nucleosome occupancy and transcription-associated histone modifications using near-base pair resolution techniques. We show that antisense noncoding transcription leads to the deaceylation of a subpopulation of -1/+1 nucleosomes associated with increased H3K36 trimethylation (H3K36me3). Reduced acetylation results in decreased binding of the RSC chromatin remodeler at -1/+1 nucleosomes and subsequent sliding into the Nucleosome-Depleted Region (NDR) hindering Pre-Initiation Complex (PIC) association. Finally, we extend our model by showing that natural antisense noncoding transcription significantly represses around 20% of S. cerevisiae genes through this chromatin-based transcription interference mechanism.\n\nHighlightsO_LIInduction of antisense noncoding transcription leads to -1/+1 nucleosome sliding that competes with sense transcription PIC deposition.\nC_LIO_LIAntisense induction leads to a subpopulation of H3K36me3 nucleosomes differently positioned compared to H3K18ac nucleosomes.\nC_LIO_LIRSC chromatin remodeler recruitment to -1/+1 nucleosomes is modulated by histone acetylation levels.\nC_LIO_LI20% of S. cerevisiae genes are significantly repressed by this antisense-dependent chromatin-based transcription interference mechanism.\nC_LI

molecular biology↗

Pervasive transcription-dependent chromatin remodeling influences the replication initiation program

In Eukaryotic organisms, replication initiation follows a temporal program. Among the parameters that regulate this program in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, chromatin structure has been at the center of attention without considering the contribution of transcription. Here, we revisit the replication initiation program in the light of pervasive transcription. We find that noncoding RNA transcription termination in the vicinity of replication origins or ARS (Autonomously Replicating Sequences) maximizes replication initiation by restricting transcriptional readthrough into ARS. Consistently, high natural nascent transcription correlates with low ARS efficiency and late replication timing. High readthrough transcription is also linked to chromatin features such as high levels of H3K36me3 and deacetylated nucleosomes. Moreover, forcing ARS readthrough transcription promotes these histone modifications. Finally, replication initiation defects induced by increased transcriptional readthrough are partially rescued in the absence of H3K36 methylation. Altogether, these observations indicate that natural pervasive transcription into ARS influences replication initiation through chromatin remodeling.

molecular biology↗