Biology subjects

Smith, R. K.

Publications and source records attributed to Smith, R. K..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Senescent tenocytes drive an age-associated loss of cell-extracellular matrix homeostasis, which can be partially restored using dihydroresveratrol

Tendons are commonly injured, not only in athletes, but also during normal everyday activities, particularly in older age. Tendons are rich in extracellular matrix proteins, many of which are turned over extremely slowly during an individuals lifetime. As a result, tight regulation of the extracellular matrix is essential for tendons to remain resilient to the mechanical load placed on them. However, tendons are prone to age-associated functional decline, characterised by chronic inflammation, accumulation of damaged collagen, and matrix remodelling. These degenerative changes often precede injury, wherein additional inflammation and fibrotic tissue deposition make treatment difficult and reinjury highly likely. Understanding and preventing the causes of tendon functional decline is therefore vital to improving quality of life in the ageing population. Using an equine model, here we show that tendon fibroblasts, or tenocytes, isolated from aged tendons exhibit markers of senescence when cultured in vitro. Further, we describe how senescence in tenocytes drives inflammation, hypercontractility, and dysregulation of tendon matrix components. By replicatively senescing tenocytes isolated from young tendons, we observed that senescent tenocytes instigated proinflammatory signalling, had impaired capacity in wound healing assays, increased contractility, and secreted factors that induced senescence in healthy tenocytes. Further, tenocyte senescence dysregulated matrix turnover both at the gene and protein level. Finally, we demonstrate how senotherapeutic treatment of senescent tenocytes can reduce expression of senescence markers and restore proliferative capacity. Our results uncover systemic links between tendon ageing and cellular senescence, and identify mechanisms and therapeutic strategies for age-associated tendon degeneration.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2021

Impacts of dams on freshwater turtles: a global review to identify conservation solutions

Background and Research AimsDams impact freshwater ecosystems and biodiversity. Freshwater turtles are at direct and indirect risk due to changes caused by damming including the loss of terrestrial and aquatic nesting habitats, changes to food availability and blocking movement. Effective management of these impacts requires robust evidence in order to gain an understanding of conservation solutions that work. MethodsWe reviewed the global scientific literature that evaluated the impact of dams on freshwater turtles, and carried out additional searches of literature published in seventeen languages for studies evaluating actions to mitigate dam impacts. ResultsThe search produced 47 published articles documenting dam impacts on 30 freshwater turtle species from seven families (Chelidae, Chelydridae, Emydidae, Geoemydidae, Kinosternidae, Podocnemididae and Trionychidae) in 13 countries. Few studies were found from Europe and Asia and none from Africa. Most studies were from temperate latitudes, where studies focused more on adults and less threatened species compared with tropical latitudes. More than half of the studies (57%, n = 27) suggested actions to help mitigate dam impacts. Yet, only five studies (three temperate and two tropical) documented the effect of interventions (dam removal, flow management, artificial pond maintenance and community-based action). ConclusionThese findings demonstrate a serious lack of documented evidence evaluating mitigation actions for dam impacts on freshwater turtles. Implications for Conservation: This lack of evidence reinforces the importance of strengthening and maintaining robust long-term studies needed to develop effective and adaptive conservation actions for this group of threatened vertebrates particularly in tropical regions.

zoology↗

bioRxiv2021

Reducing publication delay to improve the efficiency and impact of conservation science

Evidence-based decision making is most effective with comprehensive access to scientific studies. If studies face delays or barriers to being published, the useful information they contain may not reach decision-makers in a timely manner. This represents a potential problem for mission-oriented disciplines where access to the latest data is paramount to ensure effective actions are deployed. We sought to analyse the severity of publication delay in conservation science -- a field that requires urgent action to prevent the loss of biodiversity. We used the Conservation Evidence database to assess the length of publication delay (time from finishing data collection to publication) in the literature that tests the effectiveness of conservation interventions. From 7,415 peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed studies of conservation interventions published over eleven decades, we find that the mean publication delay (time from completing data collection to publication) was 3.6 years and varied by conservation subject -- a smaller delay was observed for studies focussed on the management of captive animals. Publication delay was significantly smaller for studies in the non-journal literature (typically non-peer-reviewed) compared to studies published in scientific journals. Although we found publication delay has marginally increased over time (1912-2020), this change was weak post-1980s. Publication delay also varied inconsistently between studies on species with different IUCN Red List statuses and there was little evidence that studies on more threatened species were subject to a smaller delay. We discuss the possible drivers of publication delay and present suggestions for scientists, funders, publishers, and practitioners to reduce the time taken to publish studies. Although our recommendations are aimed at conservation science, they are highly relevant to other mission-driven disciplines where the rapid dissemination of scientific findings is important.

scientific communication and education↗

bioRxiv2020

Poor availability of context-specific evidence hampers decision-making in conservation

Evidence-based conservation relies on robust and relevant evidence. Practitioners often prefer locally relevant studies whose results are more likely to be transferable to the context of planned conservation interventions. To quantify the availability of relevant evidence for amphibian and bird conservation we reviewed Conservation Evidence, a database of quantitative tests of conservation interventions. Studies were geographically clustered and found at extremely low densities - fewer than one study was present within a 2,000 km radius of a given location. The availability of relevant evidence was extremely low when we restricted studies to those studying biomes or taxonomic orders containing high percentages of threatened species, compared to the most frequently studied biomes and taxonomic orders. Further constraining the evidence by study design showed that only 17-20% of amphibian and bird studies used robust designs. Our results highlight the paucity of evidence on the effectiveness of conservation interventions, and the disparity in evidence for local contexts that are frequently studied and those where conservation needs are greatest. Addressing the serious global shortfall in context-specific evidence requires a step change in the frequency of testing conservation interventions, greater use of robust study designs and standardized metrics, and methodological advances to analyze patchy evidence bases.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2019

The challenge of heterogeneous evidence in conservation

Conservation efforts to tackle the current biodiversity crisis need to be as efficient and effective as possible. To inform decision-makers of the most effective conservation actions, it is important to identify biases and gaps in the conservation literature to prioritize future evidence generation. We assessed the state of this global literature base using the Conservation Evidence database, a comprehensive collection of quantitative tests of conservation actions (interventions) from the published literature. For amphibians and birds, we investigated the nature of Conservation Evidence spatially and taxonomically, as well as by biome, effectiveness metrics, and study design. Studies were heavily concentrated in Western Europe and North America for birds and particularly amphibians. Studies that used the most robust study designs - Before-After Control-Impact and Randomized Controlled Trials - were also the most geographically restricted. Furthermore, there was no relationship between the number of studies in each 1x1 degree grid cell and the number of species, threatened species or data-deficient species. Taxonomic biases and gaps were apparent for amphibians and birds - some orders were absent from the evidence base and others were poorly represented relative to the proportion of threatened species they contained. Temperate forest and grassland biomes were highly represented, which reinforced observed geographic biases. Various metrics were used to evaluate the effectiveness of a given conservation action, potentially making studies less directly comparable and evidence synthesis more difficult. We also found that the least robust study designs were the most commonly used; studies using robust designs were scarce. Future research should prioritize testing conservation actions on threatened species outside of Western Europe and North America. Standardizing metrics and improving the robustness of study designs used to test conservation actions would also improve the quality of the evidence base for synthesis and decision-making.

ecology↗