Biology subjects

Smit, L.

Publications and source records attributed to Smit, L..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Oncogenic fusions induce an extensive cancer-restricted cryptic proteome in Ewing sarcoma

How tumors generate a cryptic "dark" proteome absent from healthy tissues, and whether it can be reversibly activated, remains unclear. In Ewing sarcoma, all tumors are driven by EWSR1::ETS fusions, making it a tractable model to study dark proteome activation. Integrating matched transcriptomes, translatomes and proteomes from 48 patient tumors with long-read RNA sequencing, single-cell Ribo-seq, proteomics and immunopeptidomics in cell line models, we show that EWSR1::FLI1 acts as a reversible switch recurrently inducing hundreds of cancer-specific neoproteins. Many arise from canonical coding regions via intragenic transcription start sites, generating truncated or out-of-frame neoproteins. We uncover a fusion-dependent increase in ribosomal readthrough into poly(A) tails, generating a stable 80-amino-acid TRPM4 neoprotein that, despite lacking a stop codon, is the most abundant tumor-specific microprotein across patients. Proteomic, immunopeptidomic, and immunofluorescence analyses validate neoproteins as tumor-restricted antigens, revealing a therapeutically actionable cancer dark proteome controlled by one oncogenic fusion.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2021

Grizzly bear toe amputation due to seasonal overlap with furbearer trapping in southeast British Columbia

Science and adaptive management form crucial components of the North American model of wildlife management. Under this model, wildlife managers are encouraged to update management approaches when new information arises whose implementation could improve the stewardship and viability of wildlife populations and the well-being of animals. Here we detail a troubling observation of several grizzly bears with amputated toes in southeast British Columbia and assemble evidence to inform management strategies to remedy the issue. During the capture of 59 grizzly bears, we noticed that four individuals (~7%) had amputated toes on one of their front feet. The wounds were all healed and linear in nature. Further opportunistic record collection revealed that similar examples of amputated toes occurred beyond our study area, and that furbearer traps were frequently responsible for toe loss. We found evidence that seasonal overlap between the active season for grizzly bears and the fall trapping seasons for small furbearers with body grip traps and for wolves with foothold traps may explain the issue. Multiple options to reduce or eliminate this issue exist, but have varying degrees of expected efficacy and require differing levels of monitoring. The most certain approach to greatly reduce the issue is to delay the start of the marten trapping season until December 1, when most bears have denned, instead of opening the season on or prior to November 1, when more than 50% of bears are still active. Additionally, innovative solutions, such as narrowing trap entrances to exclude bear feet while still allowing entrance of target furbearers, have the potential to minimize accidental capture of bears, but the effectiveness of these approaches is unknown. Experimental evidence suggested that better anchoring traps was not a viable solution. Solutions that do not involve season changes will require monitoring of efficacy and compliance to ensure success.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2020

Jumping back and forth: anthropozoonotic and zoonotic transmission of SARS-CoV-2 on mink farms

The zoonotic origin of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is still unknown. Animal experiments have shown that non-human primates, cats, ferrets, hamsters, rabbits and bats can be infected by SARS-CoV-2. In addition, SARS-CoV-2 RNA has been detected in felids, mink and dogs in the field. Here, we describe an in-depth investigation of outbreaks on 16 mink farms and humans living or working on these farms, using whole genome sequencing. We conclude that the virus was initially introduced from humans and has evolved, most likely reflecting widespread circulation among mink in the beginning of the infection period several weeks prior to detection. At the moment, despite enhanced biosecurity, early warning surveillance and immediate culling of infected farms, there is ongoing transmission between mink farms with three big transmission clusters with unknown modes of transmission. We also describe the first animal to human transmissions of SARS-CoV-2 in mink farms. One sentence summarySARS-CoV-2 transmission on mink farms.

genomics↗