Skuce, P. J. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2020

The influence of liver fluke infection on production in sheep and cattle: a meta-analysis

Liver flukes (Fasciola spp) are important parasites of sheep and cattle across the world, causing significant damage to animal health and productivity due to both acute and chronic infection. Many comprehensive reviews have discussed the results of decades of research into the impact of fluke infection on livestock performance traits such as weight gain and milk production. While fluke are considered to be important, there have been no attempts to collate previous research in a quantitative manner, and nor has there been an attempt to determine why some studies find substantial effects of fluke while others conclude that effects of fluke on animal performance are negligible. In this study, we used meta-analysis to provide quantitative estimates of the impact of liver fluke on animal performance, and to identify elements of study design that influence the conclusions of such studies. A literature search provided 233 comparisons of performance in "fluke-infected" and "uninfected" animals. We standardized these data as log response ratios and calculated effect size variances in order to weight studies by their sample size and accuracy of their estimates. We performed multi-level meta-analysis to estimate effects of fluke infection in five traits: daily weight gain (N = 77); live weight (N = 47); carcass weight (N = 84); total weight gain (N = 18) and milk production (N = 6). There were significant negative effects of fluke infection on daily weight gain, live weight and carcass weight (9%, 6% and 0.6% reductions in performance, respectively), but not total weight gain or milk production. We then used mixed-effects meta-analysis to estimate the impact of moderator variables, including host, fluke, and study design factors, on study outcomes. We found that, in general, studies that gave experimental infections found generally larger effects of fluke than observational or drug studies; younger animals were more likely to suffer the effects of fluke infection on daily weight gain; and that effects on live weight increased across the course of an experiment. Our results provide the first quantitative estimate of the importance of liver fluke on performance across studies and highlight the elements of study design that can influence conclusions. Furthermore, our literature search revealed areas of research into liver fluke that could be the subject of greater effort, and types of study that could form the basis of future meta-analyses.

zoology↗

bioRxiv2020

Tolerance of liver fluke infection varies between breeds and producers in Scottish beef cattle

Liver fluke (Fasciola spp.) are important helminth parasites of livestock globally and cause significant reductions in health and productivity of beef cattle. Attempts to control fluke have been thwarted by the difficulty of vaccine design, the evolution of flukicide resistance, and the need to control the intermediate snail host. Mechanisms to reduce the impact of parasites on animal performance have typically focused on promoting host resistance - defined as the ability of the host to kill and remove the parasite from its system - and such strategies include improving protein nutrition or selectively breeding for resistance. Organisms, however, have another broad mechanism for mitigating the impact of parasites: they can show tolerance, defined as the ability to maintain health or performance under increasing parasite burden. Tolerance has been studied in the plant literature for over a century, but there are very few empirical studies of parasite tolerance in livestock. In this study, we used data collected from >90,000 beef cattle to estimate the impact of the severity of liver fluke infection on performance and variation in tolerance of fluke. Severity of liver fluke infection was estimated using liver "fibrosis score" on a scale of 0-3 and performance estimated as (1) age at slaughter and (2) daily dead weight gain. Animals with higher fibrosis scores were slaughtered around two weeks later than animals with no fluke, and gained around 10g less weight per day. There was also considerable variation in these effects of fibrosis score, such that animals from different producers and breeds varied in their tolerance of fluke infection. While breeds did not vary in the association between fibrosis and age at slaughter, there was considerable variation among producers: high fibrosis score delayed slaughter by up to 50 days in some producers, but not at all in others. Meanwhile, there was support for variation in the slope of daily dead weight gain on fibrosis score among both breeds and producers, with some unaffected by high fluke scores and some breeds and producers experiencing a 20g/day lower weight gain under high fluke scores. Our results point to the potential for both environmental and genetic variation in tolerance of liver fluke in cattle, paving the way for quantitative genetic and nutritional research into the feasibility of promoting tolerance as a disease mitigation strategy. ImplicationsPromoting tolerance of disease could help mitigate the impact of disease on livestock productivity, but little research has explored variation in tolerance of livestock diseases or the possibility of promoting tolerance as a mitigation strategy. We used abattoir data to demonstrate that beef cattle vary in their tolerance of fluke infection: while animals from some breeds and some producers experience no impact of fluke on production, others show a large negative effect. Thus, promoting tolerance through management and/or selective breeding could offer a means of reducing the impact of liver fluke on cattle performance.

pathology↗