Biology subjects

Sirak, K.

Publications and source records attributed to Sirak, K..

12 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

The south Congo Basin was critical to Bantu settlement of south central Africa

South central Africa, between the Congo Basin, the Great Lakes, and southern Africa, has long served as a corridor for human movement. Yet, it remains unclear whether there is genetic continuity between pre-Iron Age foragers and later Bantu-associated populations and whether the settlement of this region reflects multiple Bantu-associated migrations rather than the simpler serial founder model suggested by existing genomic data. To do so, we generated genome-wide ancient DNA from 71 Iron Age and historical individuals from present-day Zambia and Malawi, and analyzed these genomes alongside published data from present-day Africans. One late Iron Age individual (16th-17th century) from Kalala Island in the Kafue River, Zambia, carries 40% non Bantu related ancestry that closely matches local Later Stone Age foragers. Admixture for this individual is estimated to be 850 years ago, several centuries earlier than reported for present day BaTwa from the same region. Focusing on the Bantu-related ancestry, haplotype-based analyses identify two main clusters among Iron Age, historical, and present-day south central Bantu groups associated with different Bantu-related migrations. These results reveal a layered history in which at least two Bantu expansions radiated from the southern Congo Basin, with south central Africa acting both as a crossroads of these movements and as a staging area for the subsequent southward expansion toward southern Africa.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2026

Buried in two places: Lineages from elite Maya tombs also found in distant caves

Classic Maya societies (250-900 CE) carved out urban centers in the rainforest reaching population heights and political complexity previously unknown in the Mesoamerican tropics. Kinship was a central feature of the social fabric, and rulership was legitimized through claims of direct descent from mythical ancestors. Mortuary practices kept the dead close to the living, and ancestor veneration sometimes produced complex deposits of disarticulated remains that are difficult to identify and whose biological relationships to one another cannot be understood without genetic data. We screened 487 human tooth and bone samples and successfully generated genome-wide data for 430 of them. Of these, 341 samples representing 107 distinct individuals were recovered from both elite and non-elite tombs in a Classic period kingdom (250-900) CE in the rugged Maya Mountains of Belize. Remarkably, 24 of these individuals have skeletal elements in both an elite tomb and in a ritual tooth cache in a distant cave located 26.5km away on the other side of the Maya Mountains. These results indicate that elite lineages created ancestors from their deceased relatives in geographically expansive ways and highlights the importance of caves in the belief system of Classic Maya elites.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2026

First Lithic Age Caribbean genomes document pre-Ceramic genetic continuity and affinities to Central America and northern South America

The population history of the Caribbeans first inhabitants has been challenging to reconstruct because few human remains are known from the regions earliest occupation which began around 6,000 years ago in Hispaniola, Cuba, and Puerto Rico. We generated genome-wide data from 19 individuals from Hispaniolas Samana Peninsula and focused on four who lived during the earliest pre-Ceramic "Lithic Age". Extending the Caribbean genetic record by more than a millennium to [~]4,400 calBP, we show that pre-Ceramic Age populations across Hispaniola and Cuba derive from a single ancestry source and document long-term genetic continuity across islands, with some local genetic structure within Hispaniola. Pre-Ceramic Age Caribbean ancestry shares most drift with populations from Central America and northern South America, although no sampled mainland group provides an adequate proxy. We infer very small effective community sizes, consistent with locally structured mating pools and little evidence of close-kin mating. These findings extend our understanding of Caribbean population history into its earliest phase. TeaserEarly Caribbean people shared ancestry across islands and lived in small, locally structured communities.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2026

Subsistence transition preceded population turnover in the eastern Colombian Andes

Northwest South America was a pivotal region for human dispersals and cultural exchange during the Holocene. The Altiplano Cundiboyacense, a high-altitude plateau in the Eastern Cordillera of the Northern Andes of Colombia, preserves one of the most continuous archaeological sequences in the Americas, spanning from late Pleistocene hunter-gatherer groups to final late Holocene Muisca chiefdoms. Increasing the regional ancient DNA sample size 11-fold, we report genome-wide data from 209 individuals who lived over a period of more than 7000 years. This includes hunter-gatherers from the early-middle (10,000-7000 BP) and middle (7000-4000 BP) Holocene, initial late Holocene people (4000-2500 BP) who have the first isotopic evidence of C-enriched diets (attributed to maize), and populations associated with increasing sedentism and food production in the Herrera (2200-1300 BP) and Muisca (1200-500 BP) Periods. Previous work identified a major population turnover distinguishing earlier groups from Herrera-Muisca Period populations, but the absence of individuals dating 6000-2000 BP in that study left unresolved whether this ancestry shift was gradual or abrupt and whether it accompanied the earliest isotopic evidence of dietary input from maize or coincided with the later emergence of Herrera culture. We show that individuals predating the Herrera Period form a lineage that persisted for over five millennia, with population structure driven by drift in small groups and no detectable external gene flow. Two individuals who lived [~]2800 years ago - one directly dated to 983-835 calBCE - exhibit genetic profiles entirely consistent with hunter-gatherer ancestry yet have isotopic values consistent with the incorporation of maize into their diets, indicating subsistence change without population replacement. The emergence of Herrera culture [~]2200 BP coincided with a sharp genetic break, reflecting the migration of people carrying ancestry diverged by up to ten millennia into the Sabana de Bogota and displacing previously established peoples. By co-analyzing ancient data with modern Native Americans, we show these later populations derived from a mixture [~]4000 years ago of groups related to Chibchan language speakers of lower Central America and ones related to present-day people at the Amazonian-Andean interface who may have lived along the Chibchan expansion route. In the Herrera and Muisca Periods, genetic substructure distinguishes people from the southern and northern Altiplano, consistent with the cultural differentiation of these regions in the archaeological record. IN BRIEFAncient DNA data from the eastern Colombian Andes reveal five millennia of population continuity during which C plants were incorporated into subsistence systems without population replacement, followed later by a major ancestry turnover involving a population with ancestry admixed between that found in Chibchan-related groups and at the Amazonian-Andean interface.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2023

Postglacial genomes from foragers across Northern Eurasia reveal prehistoric mobility associated with the spread of the Uralic and Yeniseian languages

The North Eurasian forest and forest-steppe zones have sustained millennia of sociocultural connections among northern peoples. We present genome-wide ancient DNA data for 181 individuals from this region spanning the Mesolithic, Neolithic and Bronze Age. We find that Early to Mid-Holocene hunter-gatherer populations from across the southern forest and forest-steppes of Northern Eurasia can be characterized by a continuous gradient of ancestry that remained stable for millennia, ranging from fully West Eurasian in the Baltic region to fully East Asian in the Transbaikal region. In contrast, cotemporaneous groups in far Northeast Siberia were genetically distinct, retaining high levels of continuity from a population that was the primary source of ancestry for Native Americans. By the mid-Holocene, admixture between this early Northeastern Siberian population and groups from Inland East Asia and the Amur River Basin produced two distinctive populations in eastern Siberia that played an important role in the genetic formation of later people. Ancestry from the first population, Cis-Baikal Late Neolithic-Bronze Age (Cisbaikal_LNBA), is found substantially only among Yeniseian-speaking groups and those known to have admixed with them. Ancestry from the second, Yakutian Late Neolithic-Bronze Age (Yakutia_LNBA), is strongly associated with present-day Uralic speakers. We show how Yakutia_LNBA ancestry spread from an east Siberian origin [~]4.5kya, along with subclades of Y-chromosome haplogroup N occurring at high frequencies among present-day Uralic speakers, into Western and Central Siberia in communities associated with Seima-Turbino metallurgy: a suite of advanced bronze casting techniques that spread explosively across an enormous region of Northern Eurasia [~]4.0kya. However, the ancestry of the 16 Seima-Turbino-period individuals--the first reported from sites with this metallurgy--was otherwise extraordinarily diverse, with partial descent from Indo-Iranian-speaking pastoralists and multiple hunter-gatherer populations from widely separated regions of Eurasia. Our results provide support for theories suggesting that early Uralic speakers at the beginning of their westward dispersal where involved in the expansion of Seima-Turbino metallurgical traditions, and suggests that both cultural transmission and migration were important in the spread of Seima-Turbino material culture.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2020

The genomic formation of First American ancestors in East and Northeast Asia

Upward Sun River 1, an individual from a unique burial of the Denali tradition in Alaska (11500 calBP), is considered a type representative of Ancient Beringians who split from other First Americans 22000-18000 calBP in Beringia. Using a new admixture graph model-comparison approach resistant to overfitting, we show that Ancient Beringians do not form the deepest American lineage, but instead harbor ancestry from a lineage more closely related to northern North Americans than to southern North Americans. Ancient Beringians also harbor substantial admixture from a lineage that did not contribute to other Native Americans: Amur River Basin populations represented by a newly reported site in northeastern China. Relying on these results, we propose a new model for the genomic formation of First American ancestors in Asia. One Sentence SummaryAncient Beringians do not form the deepest American lineage, but harbor admixture from Amur River Basin populations.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2020

A Minimally Destructive Protocol for DNA Extraction from Ancient Teeth

Ancient DNA sampling methods--although optimized for efficient DNA extraction--are destructive, relying on drilling or cutting and powdering (parts of) bones and teeth. As the field of ancient DNA has grown, so have concerns about the impact of destructive sampling of the skeletal remains from which ancient DNA is obtained. Due to a particularly high concentration of endogenous DNA, the cementum of tooth roots is often targeted for ancient DNA sampling, but standard destructive sampling methods often result in the loss of at least one entire root. Here, we present a minimally destructive method for extracting ancient DNA from dental cementum present on the surface of tooth roots. This method does not require destructive drilling or grinding, and, following extraction, the tooth remains safe to handle and suitable for most morphological studies, as well as other biochemical studies, such as radiocarbon dating. We extracted and sequenced ancient DNA from 30 teeth (and 9 corresponding petrous bones) using this minimally destructive extraction method in addition to a typical tooth sampling method. We find that the minimally destructive method can provide ancient DNA that is of comparable quality to extracts produced from teeth that have undergone destructive sampling processes. Further, we find that a rigorous cleaning of the tooth surface combining diluted bleach and UV light irradiation seems sufficient to minimize external contaminants usually removed through the physical removal of a superficial layer when sampling through regular powdering methods.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2020

The Genomic Formation of Human Populations in East Asia

The deep population history of East Asia remains poorly understood due to a lack of ancient DNA data and sparse sampling of present-day people. We report genome-wide data from 191 individuals from Mongolia, northern China, Taiwan, the Amur River Basin and Japan dating to 6000 BCE - 1000 CE, many from contexts never previously analyzed with ancient DNA. We also report 383 present-day individuals from 46 groups mostly from the Tibetan Plateau and southern China. We document how 6000-3600 BCE people of Mongolia and the Amur River Basin were from populations that expanded over Northeast Asia, likely dispersing the ancestors of Mongolic and Tungusic languages. In a time transect of 89 Mongolians, we reveal how Yamnaya steppe pastoralist spread from the west by 3300-2900 BCE in association with the Afanasievo culture, although we also document a boy buried in an Afanasievo barrow with ancestry entirely from local Mongolian hunter-gatherers, representing a unique case of someone of entirely non-Yamnaya ancestry interred in this way. The second spread of Yamnaya-derived ancestry came via groups that harbored about a third of their ancestry from European farmers, which nearly completely displaced unmixed Yamnaya-related lineages in Mongolia in the second millennium BCE, but did not replace Afanasievo lineages in western China where Afanasievo ancestry persisted, plausibly acting as the source of the early-splitting Tocharian branch of Indo-European languages. Analyzing 20 Yellow River Basin farmers dating to [~]3000 BCE, we document a population that was a plausible vector for the spread of Sino-Tibetan languages both to the Tibetan Plateau and to the central plain where they mixed with southern agriculturalists to form the ancestors of Han Chinese. We show that the individuals in a time transect of 52 ancient Taiwan individuals spanning at least 1400 BCE to 600 CE were consistent with being nearly direct descendants of Yangtze Valley first farmers who likely spread Austronesian, Tai-Kadai and Austroasiatic languages across Southeast and South Asia and mixing with the people they encountered, contributing to a four-fold reduction of genetic differentiation during the emergence of complex societies. We finally report data from Jomon hunter-gatherers from Japan who harbored one of the earliest splitting branches of East Eurasian variation, and show an affinity among Jomon, Amur River Basin, ancient Taiwan, and Austronesian-speakers, as expected for ancestry if they all had contributions from a Late Pleistocene coastal route migration to East Asia.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2018

The Genomic Formation of South and Central Asia

The genetic formation of Central and South Asian populations has been unclear because of an absence of ancient DNA. To address this gap, we generated genome-wide data from 362 ancient individuals, including the first from eastern Iran, Turan (Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, and Tajikistan), Bronze Age Kazakhstan, and South Asia. Our data reveal a complex set of genetic sources that ultimately combined to form the ancestry of South Asians today. We document a southward spread of genetic ancestry from the Eurasian Steppe, correlating with the archaeologically known expansion of pastoralist sites from the Steppe to Turan in the Middle Bronze Age (2300-1500 BCE). These Steppe communities mixed genetically with peoples of the Bactria Margiana Archaeological Complex (BMAC) whom they encountered in Turan (primarily descendants of earlier agriculturalists of Iran), but there is no evidence that the main BMAC population contributed genetically to later South Asians. Instead, Steppe communities integrated farther south throughout the 2nd millennium BCE, and we show that they mixed with a more southern population that we document at multiple sites as outlier individuals exhibiting a distinctive mixture of ancestry related to Iranian agriculturalists and South Asian hunter-gathers. We call this group Indus Periphery because they were found at sites in cultural contact with the Indus Valley Civilization (IVC) and along its northern fringe, and also because they were genetically similar to post-IVC groups in the Swat Valley of Pakistan. By co-analyzing ancient DNA and genomic data from diverse present-day South Asians, we show that Indus Periphery-related people are the single most important source of ancestry in South Asia--consistent with the idea that the Indus Periphery individuals are providing us with the first direct look at the ancestry of peoples of the IVC--and we develop a model for the formation of present-day South Asians in terms of the temporally and geographically proximate sources of Indus Periphery-related, Steppe, and local South Asian hunter-gatherer-related ancestry. Our results show how ancestry from the Steppe genetically linked Europe and South Asia in the Bronze Age, and identifies the populations that almost certainly were responsible for spreading Indo-European languages across much of Eurasia.\n\nOne Sentence SummaryGenome wide ancient DNA from 357 individuals from Central and South Asia sheds new light on the spread of Indo-European languages and parallels between the genetic history of two sub-continents, Europe and South Asia.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2018

Ancient genomes document multiple waves of migration in Southeast Asian prehistory

Southeast Asia is home to rich human genetic and linguistic diversity, but the details of past population movements in the region are not well known. Here, we report genome-wide ancient DNA data from thirteen Southeast Asian individuals spanning from the Neolithic period through the Iron Age (4100-1700 years ago). Early agriculturalists from Man Bac in Vietnam possessed a mixture of East Asian (southern Chinese farmer) and deeply diverged eastern Eurasian (hunter-gatherer) ancestry characteristic of Austroasiatic speakers, with similar ancestry as far south as Indonesia providing evidence for an expansive initial spread of Austroasiatic languages. In a striking parallel with Europe, later sites from across the region show closer connections to present-day majority groups, reflecting a second major influx of migrants by the time of the Bronze Age.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2018

Population Turnover in Remote Oceania Shortly After Initial Settlement

Ancient DNA analysis of three individuals dated to ~3000 years before present (BP) from Vanuatu and one ~2600 BP individual from Tonga has revealed that the first inhabitants of Remote Oceania (\"First Remote Oceanians\") were almost entirely of East Asian ancestry, and thus their ancestors passed New Guinea, the Bismarck Archipelago, and the Solomon Islands with minimal admixture with the Papuan groups they encountered [1]. However, all present-day populations in Near and Remote Oceania harbor 25-100% Papuan ancestry, implying that there must have been at least one later stream of migration eastward from Near Oceania. We generated genome-wide data for 14 ancient individuals from Efate and Epi Islands in Vanuatu ranging from 3,000-150 BP, along with 185 present-day Vanuatu individuals from 18 islands. We show that people of almost entirely Papuan ancestry had arrived in Vanuatu by 2400 BP, an event that coincided with the end of the Lapita cultural period, changes in skeletal morphology, and the cessation of long-distance trade between Near and Remote Oceania [2]. First Remote Oceanian ancestry subsequently increased via admixture but remains at 10-20% in most islands. Through a fine-grained comparison of ancestry profiles in Vanuatu and Polynesia with diverse groups in Near Oceania, we find that Papuan ancestry in Vanuatu is consistent with deriving from the Bismarck Archipelago instead of the geographically closer Solomon Islands. Papuan ancestry in Polynesia also shows connections to the ancestry profiles present in the Bismarck Archipelago but is more similar to Tolai from New Britain and Tutuba from Vanuatu than to the ancient Vanuatu individuals and the great majority of present-day Vanuatu populations. This suggests a third eastward stream of migration from Near to Remote Oceania bringing a different type of Papuan ancestry.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2017

The Genomic History Of Southeastern Europe

Farming was first introduced to southeastern Europe in the mid-7th millennium BCE - brought by migrants from Anatolia who settled in the region before spreading throughout Europe. To clarify the dynamics of the interaction between the first farmers and indigenous hunter-gatherers where they first met, we analyze genome-wide ancient DNA data from 223 individuals who lived in southeastern Europe and surrounding regions between 12,000 and 500 BCE. We document previously uncharacterized genetic structure, showing a West-East cline of ancestry in hunter-gatherers, and show that some Aegean farmers had ancestry from a different lineage than the northwestern Anatolian lineage that formed the overwhelming ancestry of other European farmers. We show that the first farmers of northern and western Europe passed through southeastern Europe with limited admixture with local hunter-gatherers, but that some groups mixed extensively, with relatively sex-balanced admixture compared to the male-biased hunter-gatherer admixture that prevailed later in the North and West. Southeastern Europe continued to be a nexus between East and West after farming arrived, with intermittent genetic contact from the Steppe up to 2,000 years before the migration that replaced much of northern Europes population.

genetics↗