Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Sippy, T.

Publications and source records attributed to Sippy, T..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Internal and external contexts drive distinct dynamics in shared action-encoding striatal neurons

Animals can initiate movements either in response to external cues or from internal drive, yet how the brain flexibly supports both remains unclear. Disorders such as Parkinsons disease disrupt these modes differently, suggesting distinct underlying mechanisms. Such differences could arise from specialized circuits dedicated to each action mode or from shared neuronal populations that shift their dynamics across contexts. To distinguish between these possibilities, we performed two-photon calcium imaging in the dorsolateral striatum as mice executed the same lever press either spontaneously or in response to a cue, enabling direct comparison of internally and externally triggered actions. Unsupervised clustering revealed subpopulations of neurons modulated during cue, movement, or post-action periods. Critically, the same neurons were tuned to movement across initiation contexts. However, the dynamics of this shared population evolved within distinct "context" and "action" subspaces, even before movement initiation. Both dopamine D1- and D2-receptor-expressing spiny projection neurons contributed to both subspaces, with D1-SPNs more active at the time of the sensory stimulus. These results show that context shapes neural dynamics within a shared movement-encoding population, revealing a context-generalizable striatal code that supports flexible movement initiation across internal and external drives.

neuroscience↗

Generation of knock-in Cre and FlpO mouse lines for precise targeting of striatal projection neurons and dopaminergic neurons

The basal ganglia and midbrain dopaminergic systems are critical for motor control, reward processing, and reinforcement learning, with dysfunction in these systems implicated in numerous neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disorders. To enable precise genetic targeting of key neuronal populations, we generated and characterized five knock-in mouse lines: Drd1-Cre, Adora2a-Cre, Drd1-FlpO, Adora2a-FlpO, and DAT-FlpO. These lines allow for Cre-or FlpO-mediated recombination in dopamine D1 receptor-expressing spiny projection neurons (SPNs), adenosine A2a receptor-expressing SPNs, and dopamine transporter (DAT)-expressing neurons in the midbrain. Histological analyses confirmed recombinase activity in expected brain regions, and whole-cell electrophysiological recordings validated the intrinsic excitability profiles of each neuronal subpopulation. These tools provide high specificity and reliability for studying basal ganglia circuitry and dopaminergic neurons. By enabling targeted manipulations, these openly available knock-in lines will advance research into the neural mechanisms underlying motor control, reward, and neuropsychiatric diseases.

neuroscience↗

Cell-type specific auditory responses in the striatum are shaped by feed forward inhibition

Summary/AbstractThe posterior "tail" region of the striatum receives dense innervation from sensory brain regions and has been demonstrated to play a role in behaviors that require sensorimotor integration including discrimination1,2, avoidance3 and defense4 responses. The output neurons of the striatum, the D1 and D2 striatal projection neurons (SPNs) that make up the direct and indirect pathways, respectively, are thought to play differential roles in these behavioral responses, although it remains unclear if or how these neurons display differential responsivity to sensory stimuli. Here, we used whole-cell recordings in vivo and ex vivo to examine the strength of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs onto D1 and D2 SPNs following the stimulation of upstream auditory pathways. While D1 and D2 SPNs both displayed stimulus-evoked depolarizations, D1 SPN responses were stronger and faster for all stimuli tested in vivo as well as in brain slices. This difference did not arise from differences in the strength of excitatory inputs but from differences in the strength of feed forward inhibition. Indeed, fast spiking interneurons, which are readily engaged by auditory afferents exerted stronger inhibition onto D2 SPNs compared to D1 SPNs. Our results support a model in which differences in feed forward inhibition enable the preferential recruitment of the direct pathway in response to auditory stimuli, positioning this pathway to initiate sound-driven actions.

neuroscience↗