Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Silson, E. H.

Publications and source records attributed to Silson, E. H..

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Scene perception-memory pairing extends to superior parietal cortex

Visual scene analysis relies on a set of scene-selective regions in posterior cerebral cortex (OPA, PPA, MPA), with a paired memory-responsive counterpart located in anterior (LPMA, VPMA) or overlapping cortex (MPMA). The interaction between these pairs of regions is thought to integrate visual input with mnemonic context. Recently, a fourth scene-perception area in superior parietal cortex (SPA) was identified, with a proposed role in visually-guided navigation. Whether this region also has an anterior paired memory region is currently unknown. Across two independent fMRI datasets (total N=24, 14 females) using static or dynamic stimuli and distinct memory tasks, we show that recalling visual scenes evokes robust responses in a region (referred to here as SPMA) immediately anterior and dorsal to SPA. During resting-state fMRI, SPA preferentially coupled with the other scene-perception areas, while SPMA preferentially coupled with the other place memory areas. At the whole-brain level, seed-based connectivity revealed that SPA sits at the confluence of four processing streams spanning regions implicated in egocentric scene perception, map-based navigation, perspective taking, and goal-directed movement. These findings extend the perception-memory motif associated with visual scene processing to the fourth cortical surface. The widespread anatomical coupling between scene-perception and memory processes reflects the importance of this interaction for flexible, context-grounded navigation.

neuroscience↗

Systematic effects of retinotopic biases and category selectivity across human occipitotemporal cortex

The organization of human visual cortex has traditionally been studied using two different methods: retinotopic mapping and category-selectivity mapping. Retinotopic mapping has identified a large number of systematic maps of the visual field, while category-selectivity mapping has identified clusters of neural populations that reliably respond more strongly to specific image categories such as objects, faces, scenes and body parts compared to other categories. While early investigations seemed to suggest that these two organizing principles were largely separated in the brain, with retinotopic maps in posterior visual cortex and category-selective regions in anterior visual cortex, recent work shows that category-selective regions overlap with retinotopic maps, giving rise to spatial visual field biases within these regions. Here, we collected fMRI responses whilst performing both retinotopic and category mapping within the same participants, allowing detailed comparison of neural tuning for space and category at the single voxel level. We use these data to evaluate two previous proposals of how retinotopic biases relate to category-selectivity: 1) complementary quadrant biases (upper vs. lower contralateral visual field) inherited from early visual cortex explain the presence of paired regions selective for the same category across lateral and ventral occipitotemporal cortex (lOTC, vOTC); and 2) eccentricity biases (center vs. periphery of the visual field) explain the presence of selectivity for different categories, specifically differentiating face-versus scene-selectivity within the ventral surface. Confirming and extending previous findings for a comprehensive set of face-, scene-, object, and place-selective regions of interest, we provide robust evidence that category-selective regions do not sample visual space uniformly, exhibiting systematic biases towards either the upper or lower field (all category regions) and center vs. periphery (face vs. place regions). Consistent with 1), we find that quadrant biases differ systematically between lateral and ventral OTC, with lateral regions showing systematic lower field biases and ventral regions showing upper field biases, differentiating regions selective for the same category in terms of their spatial bias. However, contrary to 2), we find that eccentricity tuning does not strongly predict the strength of face-or scene category-selectivity in a given voxel. Specifically, highly face-selective voxels are not solely confined to the fovea, and while most scene-selective voxels show peripheral tuning, highly scene-selective voxels actually show strong foveal tuning, particularly in anterior medial-ventral cortex. Collectively, these results demonstrate that spatial biases in category-selective cortex are widespread and robust, whilst also suggesting there is no simple relation between spatial tuning and category-selectivity.

neuroscience↗

Retinotopic coding organizes the opponent dynamic between internally and externally oriented brain networks

The human brain seamlessly integrates internally generated thoughts with incoming sensory information, yet the large-scale networks that support these functions -- the (Default Network, DN) and external (Dorsal Attention Network, dATN) -- are traditionally viewed as functionally independent. This raises a crucial question: how does the brain integrate information across these seemingly non-interactive systems? Here, using densely sampled 7T fMRI, individualized resting-state parcellations, and voxel-wise population-receptive-field mapping, we show that these internal/external networks are more interlocked than previously thought. Spontaneous DN and dATN activity during rest is uncorrelated at the network level. However, voxel-scale functional coupling across networks is shaped by the latent visual field preferences of individual voxels in each network, as measured during independent retinotopic mapping. Voxels that share visual field preferences exhibit stronger spontaneous coupling than those with divergent preferences. These retinotopically-specific interactions are bivalent: DN voxels with negative (suppressive) visual response amplitudes are anticorrelated with matched (positive) dATN voxels, while those DN voxels with positive response amplitudes are positively correlated. Thus, distinct subpopulations of visually-tuned DN voxels participate in spatially-specific interactions with the dATN. Further, retinotopic coding is intrinsic to the DN, persisting even during periods when the DN signal is elevated. These findings reveal a latent, voxel-level architecture of retinotopically-grounded interactions between the DN and dATN. Taken together, our results suggest that retinotopic coding underpins the dynamic coordination of perception and thought in the human brain.

neuroscience↗

Positive and Negative Retinotopic Codes in the Human Hippocampus

The hippocampus sits at the apex of the visual hierarchy, yet little is known about the visual properties of this core memory structure. Recent work suggests that a latent, bivalent retinotopic code persists in large-scale memory networks at the cortical apex, scaffolding interactions with sensory networks. Here, we tested whether a bivalent retinotopic code also persists within the hippocampus. To do this, we leveraged high-resolution 7T functional MRI along with voxel-scale visual population receptive field (pRF) modeling in 7 densely-sampled individuals (5 female). Our findings reveal a robust, voxel-scale retinotopic code broadly distributed across subfields and along the long axis of the human hippocampus, comprised of roughly equal proportions of pRFs with positive and negative amplitude responses to visual stimulation. Hippocampal pRFs displayed canonical visual properties, including stable valence and visual field preferences across runs and a contralateral bias. Retinotopic structure also persisted at rest: hippocampal voxels with similar pRF locations were more strongly correlated than voxels representing different visual field locations. Finally, across the ventral visual stream, the prevalence of negative-amplitude pRFs increased with mnemonic involvement, culminating in the balanced, bivalent organization within the hippocampus. These findings support the view that sensory and mnemonic systems are coupled through a shared retinotopic code at the apex of the visual hierarchy. Significance StatementThe hippocampus is closely coupled to the visual system, and recent work has challenged the classical view that visual coding schemes, like retinotopy, do not persist into the hippocampus. Here, we use high-resolution precision fMRI to robustly characterize a bivalent retinotopic code in the human hippocampus, consisting of both typical positive and atypical negative responses. We further show that this code predicts functional connectivity within the hippocampus even during non-visual tasks, suggesting that this bivalent retinotopic code may reflect an intrinsic organizational principle of the hippocampus relevant for perceptual-mnemonic segregation and integration.

neuroscience↗

Visual imagery of familiar people and places in category selective cortex

Visual imagery is a dynamic process recruiting a network of brain regions. We used electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) fusion to investigate the dynamics of category selective imagery in medial parietal cortex (MPC), ventral temporal cortex (VTC), and primary visual cortex (V1). Subjects attended separate EEG and fMRI sessions where they created mental images of personally familiar people and place stimuli. The fMRI contrast comparing people and place imagery replicated previous findings of category-selectivity in the medial parietal cortex. In addition, greater activity for places was found in the ventral and lateral place memory areas, the frontal eye fields, the inferior temporal sulcus, and the intraparietal sulcus. In contrast, greater activity for people was found in the fusiform face area and the right posterior superior temporal sulcus. Using multivariate decoding analysis in fMRI, we could decode individual stimuli within the preferred category in VTC. A more complex pattern emerged in MPC, which represented information that was not restricted to the preferred category. We were also able to decode category and individual stimuli in the EEG data. EEG-fMRI fusion indicated similar timings in MPC and VTC activity during imagery. However, in the VTC, fusion was higher in place selective regions during an early time window, and higher in face selective regions in a later time window. In contrast, fusion correlations in V1 occurred later during the imagery period, possibly reflecting the top-down progression of mental imagery from category-selective regions to primary visual cortex.

neuroscience↗

Opponent visuospatial coding structures responses during memory recall and visual perception in medial parietal cortex

The mechanisms linking perceptual and memory representations in the brain are not yet fully understood. In early visual cortex, perception and memory are known to share similar neural representations, but how they interact beyond early visual cortex is less clear. Recent work identified that scene-perception and scene-memory areas on the lateral and ventral surfaces of the brain are linked via a shared but opponent visuospatial coding scheme, suggesting that shared visuospatial coding might provide a framework for perceptual-memory interactions. Here, we test whether the pattern in visuospatial coding within category-selective memory areas of medial parietal cortex structures responses during memory recall and visual perception. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we observe signatures of visuospatial coding in the form of population receptive fields (pRFs) with both positive and negative response profiles within medial parietal cortex. Crucially, the more dissimilar the timeseries of a pair of positive/negative pRFs within a region, the more dissimilar their responses during both memory recall and visual perception - tasks that place very different demands on these regions: internally oriented memory recall versus externally oriented visual perception. These data extend recent work to suggest that the interplay between pRFs with opponent visuospatial coding may play a vital role in integrating information across different representational spaces.

neuroscience↗

A retinotopic code structures the interaction between perception and memory systems

Conventional views of brain organization suggest that the cortical apex processes internally-oriented information using an abstract, amodal neural code. Yet, recent reports have described the presence of retinotopic coding at the cortical apex, including the default mode network. What is the functional role of retinotopic coding atop the cortical hierarchy? Here, we report that retinotopic coding structures interactions between internally-oriented (mnemonic) and externally-oriented (perceptual) brain areas. Using fMRI, we observed robust, inverted (negative) retinotopic coding in category-selective memory areas at the cortical apex, which is functionally linked to the classic (positive) retinotopic coding in category-selective perceptual areas in high-level visual cortex. Specifically, these functionally-linked retinotopic populations in mnemonic and perceptual areas exhibit spatially-specific opponent responses during both bottom-up perception and top-down recall, suggesting that these areas are interlocked in a mutually-inhibitory dynamic. Together, these results show that retinotopic coding structures interactions between perceptual and mnemonic neural systems, thereby scaffolding their dynamic interaction.

neuroscience↗

Distributed cortical regions for the recall of people, places and objects

Human medial parietal cortex (MPC) is recruited during multiple cognitive processes. Previously, we demonstrated regions specific to recall of people or places and proposed that the functional organization of MPC mirrors the category selectivity defining the medial-lateral axis of ventral temporal cortex (VTC). However, prior work considered recall of people and places only and VTC also shows object-selectivity sandwiched between face- and scene-selective regions. Here, we tested a strong prediction of our proposal: like VTC, MPC should show a region specifically recruited during object recall, and its relative cortical position should mirror the one of VTC. While responses during people and place recall showed a striking replication of prior findings, we did not observe any evidence for object-recall effects within MPC, which differentiates it from the spatial organization in VTC. Importantly, beyond MPC, robust recall-effects were observed for people, places, and objects on the lateral surface of the brain. Place-recall effects were present in the angular gyrus, frontal eye fields and peripheral portions of early visual cortex, whereas people-recall selectively drove response in the right posterior superior temporal sulcus. Object-recall effects were largely restricted to a region posterior to left somatosensory cortex, in the vicinity of the supramarginal gyrus. Taken together, these data demonstrate that while there are distributed regions active during recall of people, places and objects, the functional organization of MPC does not mirror the medial-lateral axis of VTC but reflects only the most salient features of that axis - namely representations of people and places. Significance statementHuman medial parietal cortex (MPC) is recruited during multiple cognitive processes. Recently, we proposed a framework for interpreting the functional organization of MPC by suggesting that it reflects the categorical preferences for people and places that is evident also in ventral temporal cortex (VTC). Because VTC also exhibits selectivity for objects, we here extend this framework to test whether MPC also shows object selectivity during recall. Robust people and place recall effects were evident in MPC, but we found no evidence for object-recall within MPC, suggesting that MPC and VTC are not mirror-copies of each other. Together, these data suggest that the functional organization of MPC reflects the most salient categorical representations within VTC for people and places.

neuroscience↗

Evaluating the efficacy of multi-echo ICA denoising on model-based fMRI

fMRI is an indispensable tool for neuroscience investigation, but this technique is limited by multiple sources of physiological and measurement noise. These noise sources are particularly problematic for analysis techniques that require high signal-to-noise ratio for stable model fitting, such as voxel-wise modeling. Multi-echo data acquisition in combination with echo-time dependent ICA denoising (ME-ICA) represents one promising strategy to mitigate physiological and hardware-related noise sources as well as motion-related artifacts. However, most studies employing ME-ICA to date are resting-state fMRI studies, and therefore we have a limited understanding of the impact of ME-ICA on task or model-based fMRI paradigms. Here, we addressed this knowledge gap by comparing data quality and model fitting performance on data acquired during a visual population receptive field (pRF) mapping paradigm (N=13 participants) after using one of three preprocessing procedures: ME-ICA, optimally combined multi-echo data without ICA-denoising, and typical single echo processing. As expected, multi-echo fMRI improved temporal signal-to-noise compared to single echo fMRI, with ME-ICA amplifying the improvement compared to optimal combination alone. However, unexpectedly, this boost in temporal signal-to-noise did not directly translate to improved model fitting performance: compared to single echo acquisition, model fitting was only improved after ICA-denoising. Specifically, compared to single echo acquisition, ME-ICA resulted in improved variance explained by our pRF model throughout the visual system, including anterior regions of the temporal and parietal lobes where SNR is typically low, while optimal combination without ICA did not. ME-ICA also improved reliability of parameter estimates compared to single echo and optimally combined multi-echo data without ICA-denoising. Collectively, these results suggest that ME-ICA is effective for denoising task-based fMRI data for modeling analyses and maintains the integrity of the original data. Therefore, ME-ICA may be beneficial for complex fMRI experiments, including task fMRI studies, voxel-wise modeling, and naturalistic paradigms.

neuroscience↗

Dynamic changes in spatial representation within the posterior parietal cortex in response to visuomotor adaptation

Recent studies used fMRI population receptive field (pRF) mapping to demonstrate that retinotopic organization extends from primary visual cortex to ventral and dorsal visual pathways by quantifying visual field maps, receptive field size, and laterality throughout multiple areas. Visuospatial representation in the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) is modulated by attentional deployment, raising the question of whether spatial representation in the PPC is dynamic and flexible and that this flexibility contributes to visuospatial learning. To answer this question, changes in spatial representation within PPC, as measured with pRF mapping, were recorded before and after visuomotor adaptation. Visuospatial input was laterally manipulated, rightward or leftward, via prism adaptation, a well-established visuomotor technique that modulates visuospatial performance. Based on existing models of prism adaptation mechanism of action, we predicted left prism adaptation to produce a right visuospatial bias via an increasing pRF size in the left parietal cortex. However, our hypothesis was agnostic as to whether right PPC will show an opposite effect given the bilateral bias to right visual field. Findings show that adaptation to left-shifting prisms increases pRF size in both PPCs, while leaving space representation in early visual cortex unchanged. This is the first evidence that prism adaptation drives a dynamic reorganization of response profiles in the PPC. Our results show that spatial representation in the PPC not only reflects changes driven by attentional deployment but dynamically changes in response to visuomotor adaptation. Furthermore, our results provide support for using prism adaptation as a tool to rehabilitate visuospatial deficits. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTRepresentation of space in the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) is reflective of attentional selection. Deploying attention to a certain spatial location modulates response profiles of a corresponding set of neurons with receptive fields in the corresponding spatial location. Here, we show that visuomotor adaptation accomplished through left-shifting prism adaptation dynamically changes the representation of space in the PPC while preserving early visual representations. This is the first evidence that visuomotor adaptation drives an instant reorganization of spatial representation in PPC. This result has implications for understanding the dynamic organization of spatial representation in the PPC and for the rehabilitation of patients with neglect syndrome, whose spatial attention is compromised.

neuroscience↗

Did you see it? A Python tool for psychophysical assessment of the human blind spot

The blind spot is a region in the temporal monocular visual field in humans, which corresponds to a physiological scotoma within the nasal hemi-retina. This region has no photoreceptors, so is insensitive to visual stimulation. There is no corresponding perceptual scotoma because the visual stimulation is "filled-in" by the visual system. Investigations of visual perception in and around the blind spot allow us to investigate this filling-in process. However, because the location and size of the blind spot are individually variable, experimenters must first map the blind spot in every observer. We present an open-source tool, which runs in Psychopy software, to estimate the location and size of the blind spot psychophysically. The tool will ideally be used with an Eyelink eye-tracker (SR Research), but it can also run in standalone mode. Here, we explain the rationale for the tool and demonstrate its validity in normally-sighted observers. We develop a detailed map of the blind spot in one observer. Then, in a group of 12 observers, we propose a more efficient, pragmatic method to define a "safe zone" within the blind spot, for which the experimenter can be fully confident that visual stimuli will not be seen. Links are provided to this open-source tool and a manual.

neuroscience↗

Regions of visual cortex responding to tactile stimulation in an individual withlongstanding low vision are not causally involved in tactile processing performance

Braille reading and other tactile discrimination tasks recruit the visual cortex of both blind and normally sighted individuals undergoing short-term visual deprivation. Prior functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) work in patient S, a visually impaired adult with the rare ability to read both highly magnified print visually and Braille by touch, found that foveal representations of Ss visual cortex were recruited during tactile perception, whereas peripheral regions were recruited during visual perception. Here, we test the causal nature of tactile responses in the visual cortex of S by combining tactile and visual psychophysics with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). First, we replicate this prior fMRI work in S. Second, we demonstrate that transient disruption of Ss foveal visual cortex has no measurable impact on Ss tactile processing performance compared to that of healthy controls - a pattern not predicted by the fMRI results. Third, stimulation of foveal visual cortex maximally disrupted visual processing performance in both S and controls, suggesting the possibility of preserved visual function within Ss foveal cortex. Finally, stimulation of somatosensory cortex induced the expected disruption to tactile processing performance in both S and controls. These data suggest that tactile responses in Ss foveal representation reflect unmasking of latent connections between visual and somatosensory cortices and not behaviourally relevant cross-modal plasticity. Unlike studies in congenitally blind individuals, it is possible that the absence of complete visual loss in S has limited the degree of causally impactful cross-modal reorganisation. Significance statementPrior fMRI work in patient S identified that foveal portions of Ss visual cortex respond more to tactile processing, whereas peripheral portions respond more to visual processing. Here, we tested whether this foveal processing was causally related to either tactile or visual processing. First, using fMRI we replicate prior work. Second, we demonstrate that TMS of the foveal representation and of somatosensory cortex interfered with visual and tactile discriminations respectively in controls and crucially also in S. The foveal representation in S, which is responsive to tactile stimulation, does not however play a causal role in mediating Ss ability to discriminate Braille characters and likely reflects the unmasking of latent connections between visual and somatosensory cortices.

neuroscience↗

Direct comparison of category and spatial selectivity in human occipitotemporal cortex

Human visual cortex is organised broadly according to two major principles: retinotopy (the spatial mapping of the retina in cortex) and category-selectivity (preferential responses to specific categories of stimuli). Historically, these principles were considered anatomically separate, with retinotopy restricted to the occipital cortex and category-selectivity emerging in the lateral-occipital and ventral-temporal cortex. However, recent studies show that category-selective regions exhibit systematic retinotopic biases, for example exhibiting stronger activation for stimuli presented in the contra- compared to the ipsilateral visual field. It is unclear, however, whether responses within category-selective regions are more strongly driven by retinotopic location or by category preference, and if there are systematic differences between category-selective regions in the relative strengths of these preferences. Here, we directly compare contralateral and category preferences by measuring fMRI responses to scene and face stimuli presented in the left or right visual field and computing two bias indices: a contralateral bias (response to the contralateral minus ipsilateral visual field) and a face/scene bias (preferred response to scenes compared to faces, or vice versa). We compare these biases within and between scene- and face-selective regions and across the lateral and ventral surfaces of visual cortex more broadly. We find an interaction between surface and bias: lateral surface regions show a stronger contralateral than face/scene bias, whilst ventral surface regions show the opposite. These effects are robust across and within subjects, and appear to reflect large-scale, smoothly varying gradients. Together, these findings support distinct functional roles for lateral and ventral visual cortex in terms of the relative importance of the spatial location of stimuli during visual information processing.

neuroscience↗

Multiple adjoining word and face selective regions in ventral temporal cortex exhibit distinct dynamics

The map of category-selectivity in human ventral temporal cortex (VTC) provides organizational constraints to models of object recognition. One important principle is lateral-medial response biases to stimuli that are typically viewed in the center or periphery of the visual field. However, little is known about the relative temporal dynamics and location of regions that respond preferentially to stimulus classes that are centrally viewed, like the face- and word-processing networks. Here, word- and face-selective regions within VTC were mapped using intracranial recordings from 36 patients. Partially overlapping, but also anatomically dissociable patches of face- and word-selectivity were found in VTC. In addition to canonical word-selective regions along the left posterior occipitotemporal sulcus, selectivity was also located medial and anterior to face-selective regions on the fusiform gyrus at the group level and within individual subjects. These regions were replicated using 7 Tesla fMRI in healthy subjects. Left hemisphere word-selective regions preceded right hemisphere responses by 125 ms, potentially reflecting the left hemisphere bias for language; with no hemispheric difference in face-selective response latency. Word-selective regions along the posterior fusiform responded first, then spread medially and laterally, then anteriorally. Face-selective responses were first seen in posterior fusiform regions bilaterally, then proceeded anteriorally from there. For both words and faces, the relative delay between regions was longer than would be predicted by purely feedforward models of visual processing. The distinct time-courses of responses across these regions, and between hemispheres, suggest a complex and dynamic functional circuit supports face and word perception. Significance StatementRepresentations of visual objects in the human brain have been shown to be organized by several principles, including whether those objects tend to be viewed centrally or peripherally in the visual field. However, it remains unclear how regions that process objects that are viewed centrally, like words and faces, are organized relative to one another. Here, invasive and non-invasive neuroimaging suggests there is a mosaic of regions in ventral temporal cortex that respond selectively to either words or faces. These regions display differences in the strength and timing of their responses, both within and between brain hemispheres, suggesting they play different roles in perception. These results illuminate extended, bilateral, and dynamic brain pathways that support face perception and reading.

neuroscience↗

TMS of lateral occipital cortex reduces BOLD responses across category-selective areas in ventral temporal cortex

Human visual cortex contains three scene-selective regions in the lateral, medial and ventral cortex, termed the occipital place area (OPA), medial place area (MPA) and parahippocampal place area (PPA). Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), all three regions respond more strongly when viewing visual scenes compared with isolated objects or faces. To determine how these regions are functionally and causally connected, we applied transcranial magnetic stimulation to OPA and measured fMRI responses before and after stimulation, using a theta-burst paradigm (TBS). To test for stimulus category-selectivity, we presented a range of visual categories (scenes, buildings, objects, faces). To test for specificity of any effects to TBS of OPA we employed two control conditions: Sham, with no TBS stimulation, and an active TBS-control with TBS to a proximal face-selective cortical region (occipital face area, or OFA). We predicted that TBS to OPA (but not OFA) would lead to decreased responses to scenes and buildings (but not other categories) in other scene-selective cortical regions. Across both ROI and whole-volume analyses, we observed decreased responses to scenes in PPA as a result of TBS. However, these effects were neither category specific, with decreased responses to all stimulus categories, nor limited to scene-selective regions, with decreases also observed in face-selective fusiform face area (FFA). Furthermore, similar effects were observed with TBS to OFA, thus effects were not specific to the stimulation site in the lateral occipital cortex. Whilst these data are suggestive of a causal, but non-specific relationship between lateral occipital and ventral temporal cortex, we discuss several factors that could have underpinned this result, such as the differences between TBS and online TMS, the role of anatomical distance between stimulated regions and how TMS effects are operationalised. Furthermore, our findings highlight the importance of active control conditions in brain stimulation experiments to accurately assess functional and causal connectivity between specific brain regions.

neuroscience↗

Representation of contralateral visual space in the human hippocampus

The initial encoding of visual information primarily from the contralateral visual field is a fundamental organizing principle of the primate visual system. Recently, the presence of such retinotopic sensitivity has been shown to extend well beyond early visual cortex to regions not historically considered retinotopically sensitive. In particular, human scene-selective regions in parahippocampal and medial parietal cortex exhibit prominent biases for the contralateral visual field. Here we used fMRI to test the hypothesis that the human hippocampus, which is thought to be anatomically connected with these scene-selective regions, would also exhibit a biased representation of contralateral visual space. First, population receptive field mapping with scene stimuli revealed strong biases for the contralateral visual field in bilateral hippocampus. Second, the distribution of retinotopic sensitivity suggested a more prominent representation in anterior medial portions of the hippocampus. Finally, the contralateral bias was confirmed in independent data taken from the Human Connectome Project initiative. The presence of contralateral biases in the hippocampus - a structure considered by many as the apex of the visual hierarchy - highlights the truly pervasive influence of retinotopy. Moreover, this finding has important implications for understanding how this information relates to the allocentric global spatial representations known to be encoded therein. Significance StatementRetinotopic encoding of visual information is an organizing principle of visual cortex. Recent work demonstrates this sensitivity in structures far beyond early visual cortex, including those anatomically connected to the hippocampus. Here, using population receptive field modelling in two independent sets of data we demonstrate a consistent bias for the contralateral visual field in bilateral hippocampus. Such a bias highlights the truly pervasive influence of retinotopy, with important implications for understanding how the presence of retinotopy relates to more allocentric spatial representations.

neuroscience↗

An interface between spatial memory and scene perception in posterior cerebral cortex

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWHere, we report a network of brain areas bridging the spatial-memory and scene-perception systems of the human brain. Using fine-grained individual-subject fMRI, we reveal three cortical areas of the human brain, each lying immediately anterior to a region of the scene perception network in posterior cerebral cortex, that selectively activate when recalling familiar real-world locations. Despite their close proximity to the scene-perception areas, network analyses show that these regions constitute a distinct functional network that interfaces with memory systems during naturalistic scene understanding. These "place-memory areas" offer a new framework for understanding how the brain implements memory-guided visual behaviors, including navigation.

neuroscience↗

Distinct subdivisions of human medial parietal cortex are recruited differentially for memory recall of places and people

Human medial parietal cortex (MPC) is implicated in multiple cognitive processes including memory recall, visual scene processing and navigation. It is also considered a core component of the default mode network. Here, we combine fMRI data across three independent experiments to demonstrate distinct subdivisions of MPC that are selectively recruited during memory recall of either specific places or specific people. First, distinct regions of MPC were identified on the basis of differential functional connectivity with medial and lateral regions of anterior ventral temporal cortex (VTC). Second, these same medial regions exhibited differential responses to the visual presentation of different stimulus categories, with clear preferences for scenes and faces, respectively. Third, and most critically, these regions were selectively recruited during either place or people memory recall. These subdivisions also showed a striking relationship with ventral and dorsal divisions of the default mode network. Taken together, these data reveal distinct subdivisions within MPC for the recall of places and people and moreover, suggest that the organizing principle defining the medial-lateral axis of VTC is reflected in MPC, but in the context of memory recall.

neuroscience↗