Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Siddavatam, P.

Publications and source records attributed to Siddavatam, P..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Efficient Protein Engineering via Integrated Language Models and Bayesian Optimization

This study investigates the application of advanced predictive models to reduce the cost and effort associated with protein engineering campaigns. We explore the use of protein language models (PLMs), a variant of large language models (LLMs), to predict functional performance from protein sequences. A common challenge in this domain is the scarcity of functional data. To address this, we examine zero-shot and few-shot learning methods. Another challenge is efficiently searching the vast fitness landscape for superior protein variants. We evaluate search methods, such as Bayesian optimization, to tackle this problem. The proposed methods are evaluated against a benchmark of 34 protein datasets containing sequences and their quantified functional values. Our findings demonstrate the potential of these advanced predictive models to streamline and accelerate the protein engineering process.

bioengineering↗

Comparative analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms and microsatellite markers for parentage verification and discovery within the equine Thoroughbred breed

Short tandem repeat (STR), also known as microsatellite markers are currently used for genetic parentage verification within equine. Transitioning from STR to single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers to perform equine parentage verification is now a potentially feasible prospect and a key area requiring evaluation is parentage testing accuracies when using SNP based methods, in comparison to STRs. To investigate, we utilised a targeted equine genotyping by sequencing (GBS) panel of 562 SNPs to SNP genotype 309 Thoroughbred horses - inclusive of 55 previously parentage verified offspring. Availability of STR profiles for all 309 horses, enabled comparison of parentage accuracies between SNP and STR panels. An average sample call rate of 97.2% was initially observed, and subsequent removal of underperforming SNPs realised a pruned final panel of 516 SNPs. Simulated trio and partial parentage scenarios were tested across 12-STR, 16-STR, 147-SNP and 516-SNP panels. False-positives (i.e. expected to fail parentage, but pass) ranged from 0% for 147-SNP and 516-SNP panels to 0.003% when using 12-STRs within trio parentage scenarios, and 0% for 516-SNPs to 1.6% for 12-STRs within partial parentage scenarios. Our study leverages targeted GBS methods to generate low-density equine SNP profiles and demonstrates the value of SNP based equine parentage analysis in comparison to STRs - particularly when performing partial parentage discovery.

genetics↗