Biology subjects

SiMa, H.

Publications and source records attributed to SiMa, H..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

Disruption of Core Stress Granule Protein Aggregates Promotes CNS Axon Regeneration

Depletion or inhibition of core stress granule proteins, G3BP1 in mammals and TIAR-2 in C. elegans, increases axon regeneration in injured neurons, showing spontaneous regeneration. Inhibition of G3BP1 by expression of its acidic or B-domain accelerates axon regeneration after nerve injury, bringing a potential therapeutic intervention to promote neural repair in the peripheral nervous system. Here, we asked if G3BP1 inhibition is a viable strategy to promote regeneration in injured mammalian central nervous system where axons do not regenerate spontaneously. G3BP1 B-domain expression was found to promote axon regeneration in the transected spinal cord provided with a permissive peripheral nerve graft (PNG) as well as in crushed optic nerve. Moreover, a cell-permeable peptide (CPP) to a subregion of B-domain (rodent G3BP1 amino acids 190-208) accelerated axon regeneration after peripheral nerve injury and promoted regrowth of reticulospinal axons into the distal transected spinal cord through a bridging PNG. G3BP1 CPP promoted axon growth from rodent and human neurons cultured on permissive substrates, and this function required alternating Glu/Asp-Pro repeats that impart a unique predicted tertiary structure. The G3BP1 CPP disassembles axonal G3BP1, G3BP2, and FMRP, but not FXR1, granules and selectively increases axonal protein synthesis in cortical neurons. These studies identify G3BP1 granules as a key regulator of axon growth in CNS neurons and demonstrate that disassembly of these granules promotes retinal axon regeneration in injured optic nerve and reticulospinal axon elongation into permissive environments after CNS injury. This work highlights G3BP1 granule disassembly as a potential therapeutic strategy for enhancing axon growth and neural repair. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTThe central nervous system (CNS) axon does not have the capacity for spontaneous axon regeneration, as seen in the peripheral nervous system (PNS). We previously showed that stress granule-like aggregates of G3BP1 are present in uninjured PNS axons, and these slow nerve regeneration. We now report that CNS axons contain G3BP1 granules, and G3BP1 granule disassembling strategies promote axon regeneration in the injured sciatic nerve, transected spinal cord with a peripheral nerve graft, and injured optic nerve. Thus, G3BP1 granules are a barrier to axon regeneration and can be targeted for stimulating neural repair following traumatic injury, including in the regeneration refractory CNS.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Conditioning electrical stimulation fails to enhance sympathetic axon regeneration

Peripheral nerve injuries are common, and there is a critical need for the development of novel treatments to complement surgical repair. Conditioning electrical stimulation (CES) is a novel variation of the well-studied perioperative electrical stimulation treatment paradigm. CES is a clinically attractive alternative because of its ability to be performed at the bedside prior to a scheduled nerve repair surgery. Although 60 minutes of CES has been shown to enhance motor and sensory axon regeneration, the effects of CES on sympathetic regeneration are unknown. We investigated how two clinically relevant CES paradigms (10 minutes and 60 minutes) impact sympathetic axon regeneration and distal target reinnervation. Our results indicate that the growth of sympathetic axons is inhibited by CES at acute time points, and at a longer survival time point post-injury, there is no difference between sham CES and the CES groups. We conclude sympathetic axons may retain some regenerative ability, but no enhancement is exhibited after CES, which may be accounted for by the inability of the electrical stimulation paradigm to recruit the small-caliber sympathetic axons into activity. Furthermore, 10-minute CES did not enhance motor and sensory regeneration with a direct repair, and neither 60-minute nor 10-minute CES enhanced motor and sensory regeneration through a graft. Further studies will be needed to optimize electrical stimulation parameters to enhance the regeneration of all neuron types.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

A bioinformatics screen reveals Hox and chromatin remodeling factors at the Drosophila histone locus

Cells orchestrate histone biogenesis with strict temporal and quantitative control. To efficiently regulate histone biogenesis, the repetitive Drosophila melanogaster replication-dependent histone genes are arrayed and clustered at a single locus. Regulatory factors concentrate in a nuclear body known as the histone locus body (HLB), which forms around the locus. Historically, HLB factors are largely discovered by chance, and few are known to interact directly with DNA. It is therefore unclear how the histone genes are specifically targeted for unique and coordinated regulation. To expand the list of known HLB factors, we performed a candidate-based screen by mapping 30 publicly available ChIP datasets and 27 factors to the Drosophila histone gene array. We identified novel transcription factor candidates, including the Drosophila Hox proteins Ultrabithorax, Abdominal-A and Abdominal-B, suggesting a new pathway for these factors in influencing body plan morphogenesis. Additionally, we identified six other transcription factors that target the histone gene array: JIL-1, Hr78, the long isoform of fs(1)h as well as the generalized transcription factors TAF-1, TFIIB, and TFIIF. Our foundational screen provides several candidates for future studies into factors that may influence histone biogenesis. Further, our study emphasizes the powerful reservoir of publicly available datasets, which can be mined as a primary screening technique.

molecular biology↗