Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Shabana, B.

Publications and source records attributed to Shabana, B..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Atopic Dermatitis and Psoriasis Differ in Lesional DEG Reference Instability and Non-Lesional Spectrum Displacement: Multi-Cohort Geometric Evidence of Individual Homeostatic Boundary Escape

Atopic dermatitis (AD) transcriptomic studies have produced notoriously inconsistent differential gene expression (DEG) lists across cohorts, and the biological heterogeneity of non-lesional AD skin remains unresolved at the individual level --limitations that group-averaged DEG analysis is structurally incapable of addressing. We applied a geometric transcriptomic framework to 537 skin RNA-sequencing samples from four independent international cohorts, positioning each sample within a 20-dimensional disease-informative PCA space relative to a unified healthy reference cloud validated by multi-cohort batch integration (ComBat; silhouette width 0.076 across three countries). Applying a bootstrap Jaccard framework to lesional-versus-healthy comparisons, AD lesional DEG signatures were significantly more reference-sensitive than psoriasis (PSO; Jaccard 0.637 vs 0.737; non-overlapping 95% CIs), with per-gene Spearman correlation between absolute effect size and cross-reference reproducibility (rho=0.658, p<2.2x10-16) establishing that ADs instability arises from its structural dependence on smaller-effect-size transcriptomic signals -- a geometric property of AD biology, not a methodological failure of prior studies. In non-lesional skin, spectrum scores -- projections of each samples displacement from the healthy centroid onto the disease axis -- revealed that AD non-lesional (AD_NL) samples had traversed 22.6% (95% CI 15.2-29.6%) of the healthy-to-lesional axis versus 12.9% (95% CI 8.4-18.2%) for PSO non-lesional (PSO_NL; Wilcoxon p=0.012), with non-lesional skin in each disease displaced toward its own lesional pole at near-identical angles (within-disease delta-angle 1.4 degrees) but AD displaced further. Against a homeostatic boundary defined as the 95th-percentile Euclidean distance of healthy controls from their centroid, 17.2% of AD_NL samples (16/93) individually exceeded this threshold versus 2.0% of PSO_NL (1/49; OR=9.87, p=0.007), replicating across all three cohorts providing AD_NL data. Among boundary-crossing AD_NL samples, two directional patterns emerged: high-positive displacement (n=6) characterised by inflammatory pre-activation (IL-6/JAK-STAT3, IFN-alpha, TNF-alpha/NF-kB) and low/negative displacement (n=10) characterised by broad metabolic suppression and a third transcriptomic axis orthogonal to both canonical disease trajectories -- not attributable to cellular infiltration differences and undetectable by group-level analysis. These findings reframe ADs notorious transcriptomic inconsistency as a predictable consequence of effect-size architecture, establish that a reproducible subset of AD patients harbours individually measurable transcriptomic boundary escape before clinical lesion onset, and identify a biologically uncharacterised non-lesional subgroup that warrants cell-type-resolved investigation as a potential early intervention target.

genomics↗

Shared Immune and Epigenetic Pathways in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Melanoma Immunotherapy: A Cross-Disease Analysis with Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and melanoma both involve dysregulated immune pathways, yet their molecular convergence remains poorly understood. We performed a cross-disease transcriptomic analysis of melanoma (GSE168204) and SLE (GSE211700) datasets to identify shared signatures of immune activation and immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) response. Differential expression analysis revealed two distinct signatures: (i) an immune signatures upregulated in melanoma responders and SLE (n = 147 genes), enriched in interferon signaling and epigenetic regulators such as ASF1B and EZH2 [4, 7, 52]; and (ii) a cell cycle signatures upregulated in melanoma non-responders and SLE (n = 157 genes), dominated by CDK1 and CCNB1 [39]. Pathway enrichment and protein-protein interaction analyses confirmed that immune activation and epigenetic remodeling drive convergence between SLE and melanoma responders, while cell cycle upregulation is specific to ICB resistance [13, 53]. Validation in independent datasets (GSE91061, GSE261866) supported the immune signatures relevance (AUC = 0.780, p = 0.0456) and the cell cycle signatures specificity to melanoma (p = 0.2414 in SLE) [17, 18].In TCGA-SKCM survival analysis, the cell cycle signature demonstrated strong prognostic value, predicting dramatically worse overall survival (OS HR = 15.634, 95% CI: 1.898 - 128.761, p = 0.011) and progression-free survival (PFS HR = 8.484, 95% CI: 1.420 - 50.688, p = 0.019). The immune signature showed protective trends for both OS (HR = 0.259, p = 0.121) and PFS (HR = 0.656, p = 0.585), while a composite score integrating both signatures achieved significant prognostic utility (OS HR = 0.141, p = 0.004; PFS HR = 0.324, p = 0.053) [40]. Connectivity Map analysis identified mTOR inhibitors, proteasome inhibitors, HDAC inhibitors, and statins as candidate therapeutics targeting these pathways [45, 50]. Limitations include reliance on transcriptomic data, moderate biomarker performance (AUC = 0.6567 - 0.780), and lack of functional validation. Future studies should validate these signatures in ICB-treated cohorts, integrate multi-omics, and test proposed therapeutics preclinically. Overall, this cross-disease analysis highlights immune-epigenetic convergence linking SLE and melanoma, with implications for biomarker development and therapeutic repurposing [6, 12].

immunology↗

EP300 and FCGR2B Emerge as Coordinated Mediators of Chromatin-Driven Immune Evasion in Melanoma Resistance

Primary resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy in metastatic melanoma remains a clinical challenge. This study reanalyzed the GSE168204 dataset to elucidate molecular mechanisms of resistance and response, incorporating batch correction to address limitations in our prior preprint[6]. RNA-seq data from 25 melanoma biopsies (9 responders, 16 non-responders) were analyzed using DESeq2 with surrogate variable analysis[9,10]. We identified 3,247 differentially expressed genes, revealing a "cell cycle shield" signature in non-responders characterized by upregulation of CDK1, CCNB1, E2F1, and HSP90AA1 enriched for proliferation and DNA repair pathways, suggesting immune evasion through rapid tumor growth. Responders exhibited upregulation of EP300, CREBBP, FCGR2B, and histone genes enriched for chromatin organization and systemic lupus erythematosus pathways, indicating immune activation and autoimmune-like transcriptional programs. Notably, batch correction reversed the roles of EP300 and FCGR2B from non-responders to responders[6], highlighting their context-dependent functions in immune engagement. The "cell cycle shield" suggests targeting CDK1 or HSP90AA1 to overcome resistance[13,14], while the SLE signature may serve as a response biomarker reflecting immune activation states[7]. Validation in larger cohorts and experimental models is needed to translate these findings into personalized immunotherapy strategies.

cancer biology↗