Biology subjects

Sentis, A. I.

Publications and source records attributed to Sentis, A. I..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2023

Cortical and subcortical brain networks predict prevailing heart rate

Resting heart rate may confer risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and other adverse cardiovascular events. While the brainstems autonomic control over heart rate is well established, less is known about the regulatory role of higher-level cortical and subcortical brain regions, especially in humans. The present study sought to characterize the brain networks that predict variation in prevailing heart rate in otherwise healthy adults. We used machine learning approaches designed for complex, high-dimensional datasets, to predict variation in instantaneous heart period (the inter-heartbeat-interval) from whole brain hemodynamic signals measured by fMRI. Task-based and resting-state fMRI, as well as peripheral physiological recordings, were taken from two datasets that included extensive repeated measurements within individuals. Our models reliably predicted instantaneous heart period from whole brain fMRI data both within and across individuals, with prediction accuracies being highest when measured within-participants. We found that a network of cortical and subcortical brain regions, many linked to psychological stress, were reliable predictors of variation in heart period. This adds to evidence on brain-heart interactions and constitutes an incremental step towards developing clinically-applicable biomarkers of brain contributions to CVD risk. Impact statementUsing whole brain fMRI data, we reliably predicted instantaneous heart period within and across individuals from the activity of a network of cortical and subcortical brain regions, many linked to psychological stress. This adds to existing evidence on brain-heart interactions and constitutes a step towards developing clinically-applicable biomarkers of brain contributions to CVD risk.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

Similarity in evoked responses does not imply similarity in macroscopic network states across tasks

There is an ongoing debate as to whether cognitive processes arise from a group of functionally specialized brain modules (modularism) or as the result of distributed nonlinear processes (dynamical systems theory). The former predicts that tasks recruiting similar local brain areas should be equally similar in their network profiles. The latter allows for differential connectivity, even when the areas recruited are largely the same. Here we evaluated both views at the macroscopic level by comparing region-wise activation patterns and functional correlation profiles from a large sample of healthy subjects (N=242) that performed two executive control tasks known to recruit nearly identical brain areas, the color-word Stroop task and the Multi-Source Interference Task (MSIT). Using a measure of instantaneous functional correlations, based on edge time series, we estimated the task-related networks that differed between incongruent and congruent conditions. At the group level, the two tasks were much more different in their network profiles than in their evoked activity patterns. This is found even when matching the degrees of freedom of both activation patterns and functional correlation profiles, when considering subject-level differences, after changing brain parcellations, and if employing alternative methods for defining task-related network profiles. Our results are consistent with the perspective of the brain as a dynamical system, suggesting that task representations should be independently evaluated at both node and edge (connectivity) levels. Significant StatementIf the brain is strictly modular at the macroscopic scale, then recruiting the same brain regions should result in the same functional interactions between regions. However, if the brain is a dynamical system, with information represented at both the node and edge levels, then two tasks could have the same pattern of activation, but largely different functional correlation profiles. Here we tested this contrastive prediction using two tasks with overlapping cognitive demands, but different sensory signals. Despite being nearly identical in their activation patterns, we found that the tasks produced largely different functional correlation profiles. These findings reinforce the view of the brain as a dynamical system, with task states represented both within and across regions.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

Integrating across neuroimaging modalities boosts prediction accuracy of cognitive ability

Variation in cognitive ability arises from subtle differences in underlying neural architectural properties. Understanding and predicting individual variability in cognition from the differences in brain networks requires harnessing the unique variance captured by different neuroimaging modalities. Here we adopted a multi-level machine learning approach that combines diffusion, functional, and structural MRI data from the Human Connectome Project (N=1050) to provide unitary prediction models of various cognitive abilities: global cognitive function, fluid intelligence, crystallized intelligence, impulsivity, spatial orientation, verbal episodic memory and sustained attention. Out-of-sample predictions of each cognitive score were first generated using a sparsity-constrained principal component regression on individual neuroimaging modalities. These individual predictions were then aggregated and submitted to a LASSO estimator that removed redundant variability across channels. This stacked prediction led to a significant improvement in accuracy, relative to the best single modality predictions (approximately 1% to 4% boost in variance explained), across a majority of the cognitive abilities tested. Further analysis found that diffusion and brain surface properties contribute the most to the predictive power. Our findings establish a lower bound to predict individual differences in cognition using multiple neuroimaging measures of brain architecture, both structural and functional, quantify the relative predictive power of the different imaging modalities, and reveal how each modality provides unique and complementary information about individual differences in cognitive function. Author summaryCognition is a complex and interconnected process whose underlying mechanisms are still unclear. In order to unravel this question, studies usually look at one neuroimaging modality (e.g. functional MRI) and associate the observed brain properties with individual differences in cognitive performance. However, this approach is limiting because it fails to incorporate other sources of brain information and does not generalize well to new data. Here we tackled both problems by using out-of-sample testing and a multi-level learning approach that can efficiently integrate across simultaneous brain measurements. We tested this scenario by evaluating individual differences across several cognitive domains, using five measures that represent morphological, functional and structural aspects of the brain network architecture. We predicted individual cognitive differences using each brain property group separately and then stacked these predictions, forming a new matrix with as many columns as separate brain measurements, that was then fit using a regularized regression model that isolated unique information among modalities and substantially helped enhance prediction accuracy across most of the cognitive domains. This holistic approach provides a framework for capturing non-redundant variability across different imaging modalities, opening a window to easily incorporate more sources of brain information to further understand cognitive function.

neuroscience↗