Semiadi, G. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2025

Population structure and domestication history of the Javan banteng (Bos javanicus javanicus)

The domestication of the banteng in Southeast Asia is one of the Worlds least known livestock domestications, yet a vital component of the agricultural system in Indonesia and surrounding countries. Here we generated the first reference genome of the banteng and used it to analyze a set of 78 resequenced wild and domesticated bantengs, including 19 newly generated whole-genome sequenced samples of which three are historical samples. We found low heterozygosity and significant differentiation, the latter primarily driven by recent genetic drift and inbreeding in two populations, and clearly attributable to anthropogenically driven founder events or ex-situ breeding. Population structure when excluding these two populations was limited, and we found that the evolutionary divergence between wild and domestic banteng is moderate (FST = 0.14), relatively young (10,356 years), and with post-divergence gene flow. We found only weak signals of a domestication bottleneck between [~]6100-2900 years ago, and genetic diversity is on average higher in domestic than in wild banteng. Despite the soft domestication history, we found 56 candidate genes under selection during domestication, with the leptin receptor gene (LEPR) of particular interest due to the robust selection signal across methods, and its known association to metabolism, obesity and energy homeostasis. Finally, genetic load estimation revealed that Bali cattle in Australia have high realized load, while Bali cattle from Bali have high masked load. These findings provide the first genomic insights into an understudied bovine that is Critically Endangered in its wild form, and agriculturally important in its domesticated form.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2024

The importance of small island populations for the long term survival of endangered large-bodied insular mammals

Island populations of large vertebrates have experienced higher extinction rates than mainland populations over long timescales due to demographic stochasticity, genetic drift and inbreeding. Conversely, small island populations often experience relatively less anthropogenic habitat degradation than populations on larger islands, making them potential targets for conservation interventions such as genetic rescue to improve their overall genetic diversity. Here we determine the consequences and conservation implications of long-term isolation and recent human activities on genetic diversity of island populations of two forest-dependent mammals endemic to the Wallacea archipelago: the anoa (Bubalus spp.) and babirusa (Babyrousa spp.). Using genomic analyses and habitat suitability models, we show that, compared to closely related species, populations on mainland Sulawesi exhibit low heterozygosity, high inbreeding, and a high proportion of deleterious alleles. In contrast, populations on smaller islands possess fewer deleterious mutations despite exhibiting lower heterozygosity and higher inbreeding. Site frequency spectra indicate that these patterns reflect stronger, long-term purging in smaller island populations. Our results thus suggest that conservation efforts should focus on protecting small island habitats and avoiding translocations from mainland populations. This study highlights the crucial role of small offshore islands for the long-term survival of Wallaceas iconic and indigenous mammals in the face of development on the mainland. Significance statementWithin tropical archipelagos, such as the Wallacea biodiversity hotspot, larger islands experience greater resource exploitation compared to smaller ones, highlighting the potential of smaller islands as refuges for conservation. To investigate the genetic health of populations on small islands, we used genomic, occurrence, and environmental data from a system of replicated populations of anoa and babirusa across islands of varying sizes. In contrast to larger islands like Sulawesi, our results demonstrate that smaller offshore islands not only provide higher-quality habitats but also support populations that have efficiently purged harmful mutations. Thus, despite their known vulnerability over geological time-frames, small island populations can provide long term insurance against human-driven extinction and conservation efforts should prioritise habitat management over translocations.

evolutionary biology↗