Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Selvadurai, B. R.

Publications and source records attributed to Selvadurai, B. R..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Neuroendocrine-like/EMT dedifferentiation mediates resistance to EGFR inhibitors via the NRG1/HER3 axis

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) carrying activating EGFR mutations typically respond favorably to third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as osimertinib. Nevertheless, resistance almost inevitably emerges, ultimately limiting the durability of these treatments. We investigated non-genomic mechanisms enabling drug-tolerant persister cells to survive EGFR inhibition, likely co-opting compensatory HER3 activation, whose underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Using a combination of immortalized and patient-derived cellular models, together with single-cell RNA sequencing, we demonstrate that activation of EGFR/HER3 axis constitutes an early adaptive response to TKI exposure enriched in pulmonary alveolar type I and type II cancer cells. This response is driven by neuregulin-1 (NRG1), produced by stromal cells and by cancer cells undergoing NE-like/EMT dedifferentiation. Importantly, in vivo studies demonstrated that combining EGFR inhibition and NRG1 neutralization by monoclonal antibody successfully eradicated tumors. Together, these findings point to a therapeutic strategy to overcome TKI resistance in NSCLC through targeting HER3 signalling, its interplay with EGFR, and tumor microenvironment-derived cues.

cancer biology↗

Avoidance of pyroptosis accounts for the relatively high metastatic potential observed in early hybrid EMT states

EMT converts epithelial (E) phenotypes to invasive mesenchymal (M) states. However, analyses of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) indicated that biphenotypic (E+M) CTCs better correlate with metastasis. Similarly, investigations of murine tumors undergoing EMT concluded that early E+M states posses the highest metastatic potential. To explore this, we selected in animals with breast cancer CTCs having progressively increasing intravasation abilities. This revealed that downregulation of arrestin Arrdc4 associates with CTC aggressiveness. In xenografts, depleting Arrdc4 accelerated tumor progression, whereas overexpression hindered progression in immunocompetent, but not in immunocompromised mice. Mechanistically, high Arrdc44 suppresses glucose uptake and enhances gasdermin E, triggering pyroptosis a type of pro-inflammatory cell death. Consistently, Arrdc4s lowest levels characterize the most metastatic biphenotypic states. In patients, both epigenetic and chromosomal aberrations downregulate ARRDC4 and predict poor prognosis. In summary, the uncovered mechanism portrays pyroptosis of biphenotypic EMT cells as a rheostat of CTCs, which may resolve the controversy on the role played by EMT in metastasis.

cancer biology↗

TMPRSS2-ERG confers resistance to antiandrogens: mechanism and therapeutic implications

Approximately 50% of prostate cancer (PCa) patients harbor fusions involving the TMPRSS2 and ERG genes. Despite this, tailored therapies targeting the fused gene, tERG, remain undeveloped. Our study analyzed biopsy samples from two clinical trials assessing the efficacies of androgen receptor (AR) signaling inhibitors (ARSIs). The results revealed that tERG promotes resistance to ARSIs and is associated with elevated levels of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). Subsequent assays showed that GR directly interacts with tERG, alleviates allosteric autoinhibition and prevents chemotherapy-induced tERG degradation. In PCa models, either inhibiting GR or lowering cortisol levels suppressed tumor growth in tERG-positive models, but not in fusion-negative models. In addition, patient-derived fusion-positive xenografts displayed enhanced sensitivity to combined GR and AR inhibitors. Collectively, these findings highlight TMPRSS2-ERG as a new biomarker and propose that simultaneous inhibition of GR and AR may specifically benefit tERG-positine patients. However, GR stimulatory corticosteroid therapies may not be advisable for this patient subgroup.

cancer biology↗