Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Sella, G.

Publications and source records attributed to Sella, G..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Measuring intolerance to mutation in human genetics

In numerous applications, from working with animal models to mapping the genetic basis of human disease susceptibility, it is useful to know whether a single disrupting mutation in a gene is likely to be deleterious1-4. With this goal in mind, a number of measures have been developed to identify genes in which protein-truncating variants (PTVs), or other types of mutations, are absent or kept at very low frequency in large population samples--genes that appear \"intolerant to mutation\"3,5-9. One measure in particular, pLI, has been widely adopted7. By contrasting the observed versus expected number of PTVs, it aims to classify genes into three categories, labelled \"null\", \"recessive\" and \"haploinsufficient\"7. Such population genetic approaches can be useful in many applications. As we clarify, however, these measures reflect the strength of selection acting on heterozygotes, and not dominance for fitness or haploinsufficiency for other phenotypes.

genetics

Evolutionary tradeoffs and the structure of allelic polymorphisms

Populations of organisms show prevalent genetic differences called polymorphisms. Understanding the effects of polymorphisms is of central importance in biology and medicine. Here, we ask which polymorphisms occur at high frequency when organisms evolve under tradeoffs between multiple tasks. Multiple tasks present a problem, because it is not possible to be optimal at all tasks simultaneously and hence compromises are necessary. Recent work indicates that tradeoffs lead to a simple geometry of phenotypes in the space of traits: phenotypes fall on the Pareto front, which is shaped as a polytope: a line, triangle, tetrahedron etc. The vertices of these polytopes are the optimal phenotypes for a single task. Up to now, work on this Pareto approach has not considered its genetic underpinnings. Here, we address this by asking how the polymorphism structure of a population is affected by evolution under tradeoffs. We simulate a multi-task selection scenario, in which the population evolves to the Pareto front: the line segment between two archetypes or the triangle between three archetypes. We find that polymorphisms that become prevalent in the population have pleiotropic phenotypic effects that align with the Pareto front. Similarly, epistatic effects between prevalent polymorphisms are parallel to the front. Alignment with the front occurs also for asexual mating. Alignment is reduced when drift or linkage is strong, and is replaced by a more complex structure in which many perpendicular allele effects cancel out. Aligned polymorphism structure allows mating to produce offspring that stand a good chance of being optimal multi-taskers in at least one of the locales available to the species.

systems biology

Life history effects on neutral polymorphism levels of autosomes and sex chromosomes

All else being equal, the ratio of genetic diversity levels on X and autosomes at selectively neutral sites should mirror the ratio of their numbers in the population and thus equal [3/4]. Because X chromosomes spend twice as many generations in females as in males, however, the ratio of diversity levels is also affected by sex differences in life history. The effects of life history on diversity levels, notably those of sex-specific age structures and reproductive variances, have been studied for decades, yet existing theory relies on many parameters that are difficult to measure and lacks generality in ways that limit their applicability. We derive general yet simple expressions for these effects and show that life history effects on X-to-autosome (X:A) ratios of diversity levels depend only on sex-ratios of mutation rates, generation times, and reproductive variances. These results reveal that changing the sex-ratio of generation times has opposite effects on X:A ratios of polymorphism and divergence. They also explain how sex-specific life histories modulate the response of X:A polymorphism ratios to changes in population size. More generally, they clarify that sex-specific life history--generation times in particular--should have a marked effect on X:A polymorphism ratios in many taxa and enable the investigation of these effects.\n\nSignificance StatementUnderstanding the determinants of neutral diversity patterns on autosomes and sex chromosomes provides a bedrock for our interpretation of population genetic data. Sex-specific age-structure and variation in reproductive success have long been thought to affect neutral diversity, but theoretical descriptions of these effects were complicated and/or lacked in generality, stymying attempts to relate diversity patterns of species with their life history. We derive general yet simple expressions for these effects, which clarify how they impact neutral diversity and should enable studies of relative diversity levels on the autosomes and sex chromosomes in many taxa.

evolutionary biology