Biology subjects

Sehara, K.

Publications and source records attributed to Sehara, K..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

A multimodal dataset linking wide-field calcium imaging to behavior changes in mice during an operant lever-pull task

The BraiDyn-BC (Brain Dynamics underlying emergence of Behavioral Change) Database offers an extensive, multimodal dataset that links wide-field calcium imaging of the mouse neocortex to comprehensive behavioral measurements during a behavioral task. As one of the contents in this database, we newly provide a dataset that includes 15 sessions spanning two weeks of motor skill learning, in which 25 mice were trained to pull a lever to obtain water rewards. Simultaneous high-speed videography captures body, facial, and eye movements, and environmental parameters are monitored. The dataset also features resting-state cortical activity and sensory-evoked responses, enhancing its utility for both learning-related and sensory-driven neural dynamics studies. Data are formatted in accordance with the Neurodata Without Borders (NWB) standard, ensuring compatibility with existing analysis tools and adherence to the FAIR principles. This resource enables in-depth investigations into the neural mechanisms underlying behavior and learning. The platform encourages collaborative research, supporting the exploration of rapid within-session learning effects, long-term behavioral adaptations, and neural circuit dynamics.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2024

Movement-independent representation of reward-predicting cues in the medial part of the primate premotor cortex

Neural activity across the dorsal neocortex of rodents is dominated by orofacial and limb movements, irrespective of whether the movements are task-relevant or task-irrelevant. To examine the extent to which movements and a primitive cognitive signal, i.e., reward expectancy, modulate the activity of multiple cortical areas in primates, we conducted unprecedented wide-field one-photon calcium imaging of frontoparietal and auditory cortices in common marmosets while they performed a classical conditioning task with two auditory cues associated with different reward probabilities. Licking, eye movement, and hand movement strongly modulated the neuronal activity after cue presentation in the motor and somatosensory cortices in accordance with the somatotopy. By contrast, the posterior parietal cortex and primary auditory cortex did not show much influence from licking. Licking increased the activity in the caudal part of the dorsal premotor cortex, but decreased the activity in the central and lateral parts of the rostral part of the dorsal premotor cortex (PMdr). Reward expectancy that was separable from both spontaneous and goal-directed movements was mainly represented in the medial part of PMdr. Our results suggest that the influence of movement on primate cortical activity varies across areas and movement types, and that the premotor cortex processes motor and cognitive information in different ways within further subdivided areas.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

What moves when mice move a single whisker to touch? Individuality and stereotypy in behavior

A key function of the brain is to move the body through a rich, complex environment. When rodents engage with their environment, they move their whiskers as they extract tactile information. Even though the study of whisking has a long history, the details of individual whisker movements bilaterally, of nose movement, of stereotypy and variability in an active whisking to touch task are unknown. Here we trained head fixed mice in a simple go-cue task to move a whisker on one side of the face to touch a sensor and tracked facial movements. Our analysis shows that mice specifically control movement of the whisker they use to touch and that as they move their whiskers, they move their nose and apply forces on the head-post in a manner that reflects the behavioral epoch, i.e. whether go cue triggered movement had begun, or a whisker was touching the sensor. Importantly, mice control the setpoint, amplitude and frequency of movement of whiskers bilaterally and individually. Additionally, even though mice achieved the goal of the task -- to touch the sensor within 2 seconds -- how they coordinated movement of the nose and forces on head post with movement of individual whiskers was stereotyped and related to the distance they needed to move a whisker to touch the sensor. Our work shows how stereotyped mouse behavior can be, and it emphasizes both the level of fine motor control mice can exert over individual whiskers and the extent of facial movements in a goal-directed whisking-to-touch task. SignificanceRecent work shows that facial movements are reflected in the activity of a surprisingly large number of brain areas. But what aspects of the face do mice move when they move a whisker to actively touch an object? Our work shows that while mice control the movement of a whisker they use to touch, they also move their nose, apply forces on the head-post and move adjacent whiskers and whiskers on the other side of the face. Additionally, our analysis shows that from day-to-day, this behavior can be surprisingly stereotyped, and that small changes in how far mice move a whisker during tactile behavior fundamentally changes the relationship between the movement of a single whisker and other facial movements.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

Predicting behavior from eye movement and whisking asymmetry

Navigation through complex environments requires motor planning, motor preparation and the coordination between multiple sensory motor modalities. For example, the stepping motion when we walk is coordinated with motion of the torso, arms, head and eyes. In rodents, movement of the animal through the environment is often coordinated with whisking. Here we trained head fixed mice, navigating a floating Airtrack plus maze, to overcome their directional preference and use cues indicating the direction of movement expected in each trial. Once cued, mice had to move backward out of a lane, then turn in the correct direction, and enter a new lane. In this simple paradigm, as mice begin to move backward, they position their whiskers asymmetrically: whiskers on one side of the face protract, and on the other side they retract. This asymmetry reflected the turn direction. Additionally, on each trial, mice move their eyes conjugately in the direction of the upcoming turn. Not only do they move their eyes, but saccadic eye movement is coordinated with the asymmetric positioning of the whiskers. Our analysis shows that the asymmetric positioning of the whiskers predicts the direction of turn that mice will make at an earlier stage than eye movement does. We conclude that, when mice move or plan to move in complex real-world environments, their motor plan and behavioral state can be read out in the movement of both their whiskers and eyes.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2019

Whisking signals motor preparation and the behavioral state of mice

A central function of the brain is to plan, predict and imagine the effect of movement in a dynamically changing environment. Here we show that in mice head fixed in a plus-maze, floating on air, and trained to pick lanes based on visual stimuli, the asymmetric movement and position of whiskers on the two sides of the face signals whether the animal is moving, turning, expecting reward or licking. We show that 1) we can decode and predict the behavioral state of the animal based on this asymmetry, 2) that tactile input from whiskers indicates little about the behavioral state, and 3) that movement of the nose correlates with asymmetry, indicating that facial expression of the mouse is itself correlated with behavioral state. Amazingly, the movement of whiskers - a behavior that is not instructed or necessary in the task--informs an observer about what a mouse is doing in the maze. Thus, these mobile tactile sensors reflect a behavioral and movement-preparation state of the mouse.

neuroscience↗