Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Sebastiao, H.

Publications and source records attributed to Sebastiao, H..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Invasion of new adaptive zones retains telltale signs of directional selection at macroevolutionary scales in mammals

Directional selection is often viewed as a transient force in macroevolution, with its signal eroded over time by stabilizing and fluctuating selection. Yet, transitions into new adaptive zones are predicted to impose strong and sustained selective pressures that may leave a detectable signature even across deep timescales. We test this prediction by comparing the rates of multivariate skull morphological evolution required to traverse the boundaries between adaptive zones against genetic drift expectations. Our dataset includes 11,793 specimens spanning 231 species from 12 mammalian clades, each containing unique ecological transitions into new adaptive zones. Using a quantitative genetics framework, we estimated the phenotypic distances between ancestral and derived adaptive zones and contrasted them with null expectations under genetic drift. While a few adaptive zone invasions (e.g., marsupials and rodents) are consistent with drift, most exhibit substantially elevated rates of evolution. These results suggest that directional selection has recurrently shaped mammalian cranial evolution during major ecological shifts. We propose that adaptive zone transitions represent evolutionary contexts in which adaptation leaves a persistent macroevolutionary signal, challenging the prevailing view that long-term patterns are dominated by static forces.

evolutionary biology↗

Morphological integration during postnatal ontogeny: implications for evolutionary biology

How covariance patterns of phenotypes change during development is fundamental for a broader understanding of evolution. There is compelling evidence that mammalian skull covariance patterns change during ontogeny. However, it is unclear to what extent variation in covariance patterns during ontogeny can impact the response to selection. To tackle this question we explored: i) the extent to which covariance patterns change during postnatal ontogeny; ii) in which ontogenetic stages covariance patterns differ the most, and iii) the extent to which the phenotypic covariance pattern at different ontogenetic stages can be explained by the same processes determining additive genetic covariance. We sampled postnatal ontogenetic series for both marsupials, and placentals. Within each ontogenetic series, we compared covariance matrices (P-matrices) at different ontogenetic stages. Furthermore, we compared these P-matrices to two target matrices [adult P-matrix and an additive genetic covariance matrix (G-matrix)]. Our results show that for all ontogenetic series, covariance patterns from weaning onward are conserved and probably shaped by the same processes determining the G-matrix. We conclude that irrespective of eventual differences in how selection operates during most of postnatal ontogeny, the net response to such pressures will probably not be affected by ontogenetic differences in the covariance pattern.

developmental biology↗